On June 10, 2022 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Doe , Jane,
Suchard , David,
Suchard , Jody,
and
Sonoma Academy,
for 07: Unlimited Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice
in the District Court of Sonoma County.
Preview
1 Paul E. Gaspari, State Bar No. 76496
weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin
2 LAW CORPORATION
475 Sansome Street, Suite 510
3
San Francisco, California 94111
4 Telephone: 415.433.1400
Facsimile: 415.433.3883
5 Email: pgaspari@weintraub.com
6 Ryan E. Abernethy, State Bar No. 267538
7 weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin
LAW CORPORATION
8 400 Capitol Mall, 11th Floor
Sacramento, California 95814
9 Telephone: 916.558.6000
Facsimile: 916.446.1611
10 Email: rabernethy@weintraub.com
11
weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin
Attorneys for Defendant,
12 SONOMA ACADEMY
13
14 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
15 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SONOMA
16 DAVID SUCHARD, JODY SUCHARD, and Case No.: SCV-270984
law corporation
JANE DOE, individually, and on behalf of all
17 others similarly situated; [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: SONOMA
ACADEMY’S MOTION FOR
18
Plaintiffs, PROTECTIVE ORDER
19
vs. Date: TBD
20 Time: 3:00 p.m.
SONOMA ACADEMY, a California non- Dept: 19
21 profit; and DOES 1 through 500, Judge: Honorable Oscar A. Pardo
22
Defendants. Complaint Filed: June 10, 2022
23 FAC Filed: March 3, 2023
24
25
26
27
28
{3825800.DOCX:} 1
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
1 On ____________, 2023, at 3:00 p.m., Defendant SONOMA ACADEMY’S (“Defendant”)
2 Motion for Protective Order came on regularly for hearing in Dept. 19, of the above-entitled Court,
3 the Honorable Oscar A. Pardo presiding. All appearances for the parties were noted on the record.
4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
5 A protective order is issued staying merits-based, damage-based, and private discovery, more
6 specifically, Plaintiff Jody Suchard’s First Set of Special Interrogatories to Defendant Sonoma
7 Academy, Request Numbers 1-12; Plaintiff Jody Suchard’s First Set of Interrogatories – General,
8 Interrogatory Numbers 12.1-12.7, 13.1-13.2, 14.1-14.2, 16.1-16.3, 16.9, 17.1, and 50.1-50.6; Plaintiff
9 Jody Suchard’s First Set of Requests for Production to Defendant Sonoma Academy, Request
10 Numbers 1-17 and 19-35; and Plaintiff Jody Suchard’s First Set of Requests for Admission to
11 Defendant Sonoma Academy, Request Numbers 1-18, until the Court either certifies a class or finds
weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin
12 that Plaintiffs’ claims are not class claims.
13
14
Dated:
15 JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
16
law corporation
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
{3825800.DOCX:} 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
Document Filed Date
May 02, 2023
Case Filing Date
June 10, 2022
Category
07: Unlimited Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
1 Paul E. Gaspari, State Bar No. 76496 weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin 2 LAW CORPORATION 475 Sansome Street, Suite 510 3 San Francisco, California 94111 4 Telephone: 415.433.1400 Facsimile: 415.433.3883 5 Email: pgaspari@weintraub.com 6 Ryan E. Abernethy, State Bar No. 267538 7 weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin LAW CORPORATION 8 400 Capitol Mall, 11th Floor Sacramento, California 95814 9 Telephone: 916.558.6000 Facsimile: 916.446.1611 10 Email: rabernethy@weintraub.com 11 weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin Attorneys for Defendant, 12 SONOMA ACADEMY 13 14 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 15 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SONOMA 16 DAVID SUCHARD, JODY SUCHARD, and Case No.: SCV-270984 law corporation JANE DOE, individually, and on behalf of all 17 others similarly situated; [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: SONOMA ACADEMY’S MOTION FOR 18 Plaintiffs, PROTECTIVE ORDER 19 vs. Date: TBD 20 Time: 3:00 p.m. SONOMA ACADEMY, a California non- Dept: 19 21 profit; and DOES 1 through 500, Judge: Honorable Oscar A. Pardo 22 Defendants. Complaint Filed: June 10, 2022 23 FAC Filed: March 3, 2023 24 25 26 27 28 {3825800.DOCX:} 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 On ____________, 2023, at 3:00 p.m., Defendant SONOMA ACADEMY’S (“Defendant”) 2 Motion for Protective Order came on regularly for hearing in Dept. 19, of the above-entitled Court, 3 the Honorable Oscar A. Pardo presiding. All appearances for the parties were noted on the record. 4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 5 A protective order is issued staying merits-based, damage-based, and private discovery, more 6 specifically, Plaintiff Jody Suchard’s First Set of Special Interrogatories to Defendant Sonoma 7 Academy, Request Numbers 1-12; Plaintiff Jody Suchard’s First Set of Interrogatories – General, 8 Interrogatory Numbers 12.1-12.7, 13.1-13.2, 14.1-14.2, 16.1-16.3, 16.9, 17.1, and 50.1-50.6; Plaintiff 9 Jody Suchard’s First Set of Requests for Production to Defendant Sonoma Academy, Request 10 Numbers 1-17 and 19-35; and Plaintiff Jody Suchard’s First Set of Requests for Admission to 11 Defendant Sonoma Academy, Request Numbers 1-18, until the Court either certifies a class or finds weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin 12 that Plaintiffs’ claims are not class claims. 13 14 Dated: 15 JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT 16 law corporation 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 {3825800.DOCX:} 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER