Letter,Correspondence: JONES, GUY vs. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON (FKA THE BANK OF NEW YORK AS TRUSTEE FOR

• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                Guy Jones and Marla Jones                                                  wth
 Plaintiffs
          Vs                          marty suk iatorable Judge |Miller ,
 The Bank of New York Mellon                          District Court
 Nationstar Mortgage                HARRY kee
 Defendants
                                   123 HAR 20      AM 3: 59
 We the plaintiffs filed this suitto 21a! ROS aad Gldins‘foreclosing and selling our
 home. Here we are over 3 years later and after spending a lot of money on lawyers are
 still facing the same issues. It seems that the defendants have a way of taking control and
 we get left without any way of defending ourselves. We are not trying to get a free
 house and we are not braking the law the way the defendants have been doing . They
meaning the lawyers are playing the the judicial system like a cheep guitar. They defend
 their clients by any means necessary. They will lie and deceive you as well as us and
 that in our opinion isn’t how the government intends a lawsuit to proceed. We from day
one paid for and expected a trial to be heard and judged by a jury. This is as far as we
know still the right of every citizen in this country. Unfortunately through the doing of
the lawyers ours included we got involved with a mediation process that was anything
but-fair. All that was discussed was how much money would be paid to the defendants
We were basically told we didn’t matter. Then with a different attorney we were back to
the drawing board. We told the attorney that we wanted to have all the information that
we had accumulated to be shown to the court and used in a trial to prove our case and get
compensated accordingly. We are talking about multiple suites and in every single one
the attorneys for the defendants had misrepresented the truth. This attorney agreed with
us that was until he spoke with Elizabeth Chandler attorney for the defendants. One of
many. After that first phone call we were back to the same trickery as before. Back toa
second meditation session and nothing had changed. Once again we were dismissed by
the all the other players of this game called mediation. No talking about all the evidence
of wrongdoing we brought to the table, no discussion about how we have been harmed.
We weren’t even asked by the mediator what brought us to this point. The only one who
talked was him telling us all about himself. He called this his and I quote “my I love me
speech “ Like somehow we were going to feel better about being neglected and lied to
once again. Only after being told that Marla was bound by an order signed by Judge
Miller to pay the amount in the first MSA did we sign this MSA. Shortly afterwards we
found this order was not signed by Judge Miller and told our attorney that we wanted the
MSA to be vacated immediately on the grounds of unconscionable conduct. This didn’
happen and then came the arbitration hearing. We sent a letter to the court asking that
this case be brought before the court. No action was taken and as we sat in what was
called zoom arbitration we knew how it would go and we weren’t wrong..            The attorney
for defendant said his little speech then we were aloud to talk about whatever was on our
mind. That was all it was just talk as sour attorney sat and said nothing. Not going into
each pice of evidence as one would expect. Again we got nothing. The arbitrator stated
he had a death and that he couldn’t give us much time. Little did we know at that time
that he was in Dallas along with Elizabeth Chandler working on a different case. When
confronting her with this information she replied that they used this mediator
 “frequently”. We have no evidence but we are willing to bet the homeowners in that case
we treated as we were. They didn’t matter and there was little that they could say about
it. Our arbitration was recorded by defendants and now they are asking to have it sealed         ——-
along with the award by the arbitrator John T Wooldridge. Why would you want this to
be sealed if what took place was conducted honestly and fairly.                                  g2
That’s why they want it sealed because it was conducted by people with no intention of             Se
giving us a fair chance to prove that the defendants acted unlawfully and have unclean
hands. If any harm was committed it was by them the defendants themselves. They                   i
                                                                                                 Had
never intended to work with us and never intended for us to make it to trial. They know
the wrongdoing their clients are guilty of and if brought to trial we will prevail.
This is why we are asking that the arbitration be vacated and pray the court wileither
set this case for trial or dismiss without prejudice so we canCe
                                                               have our      incor     oe