arrow left
arrow right
  • Hidalgo County, Edinburg Consolidated Independent School District, Santa Cruz Irrigation District # 15, South Texas College, Hidalgo County Drainage District # 01, Hidalgo County Emergency Services District # 03, South Texas Independent School District VS. Susan REBECCA Cammack, TONY MARTIN, PAUL ROBERT ANDRUSTax Cases (OCA) document preview
  • Hidalgo County, Edinburg Consolidated Independent School District, Santa Cruz Irrigation District # 15, South Texas College, Hidalgo County Drainage District # 01, Hidalgo County Emergency Services District # 03, South Texas Independent School District VS. Susan REBECCA Cammack, TONY MARTIN, PAUL ROBERT ANDRUSTax Cases (OCA) document preview
  • Hidalgo County, Edinburg Consolidated Independent School District, Santa Cruz Irrigation District # 15, South Texas College, Hidalgo County Drainage District # 01, Hidalgo County Emergency Services District # 03, South Texas Independent School District VS. Susan REBECCA Cammack, TONY MARTIN, PAUL ROBERT ANDRUSTax Cases (OCA) document preview
  • Hidalgo County, Edinburg Consolidated Independent School District, Santa Cruz Irrigation District # 15, South Texas College, Hidalgo County Drainage District # 01, Hidalgo County Emergency Services District # 03, South Texas Independent School District VS. Susan REBECCA Cammack, TONY MARTIN, PAUL ROBERT ANDRUSTax Cases (OCA) document preview
  • Hidalgo County, Edinburg Consolidated Independent School District, Santa Cruz Irrigation District # 15, South Texas College, Hidalgo County Drainage District # 01, Hidalgo County Emergency Services District # 03, South Texas Independent School District VS. Susan REBECCA Cammack, TONY MARTIN, PAUL ROBERT ANDRUSTax Cases (OCA) document preview
  • Hidalgo County, Edinburg Consolidated Independent School District, Santa Cruz Irrigation District # 15, South Texas College, Hidalgo County Drainage District # 01, Hidalgo County Emergency Services District # 03, South Texas Independent School District VS. Susan REBECCA Cammack, TONY MARTIN, PAUL ROBERT ANDRUSTax Cases (OCA) document preview
  • Hidalgo County, Edinburg Consolidated Independent School District, Santa Cruz Irrigation District # 15, South Texas College, Hidalgo County Drainage District # 01, Hidalgo County Emergency Services District # 03, South Texas Independent School District VS. Susan REBECCA Cammack, TONY MARTIN, PAUL ROBERT ANDRUSTax Cases (OCA) document preview
  • Hidalgo County, Edinburg Consolidated Independent School District, Santa Cruz Irrigation District # 15, South Texas College, Hidalgo County Drainage District # 01, Hidalgo County Emergency Services District # 03, South Texas Independent School District VS. Susan REBECCA Cammack, TONY MARTIN, PAUL ROBERT ANDRUSTax Cases (OCA) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically Filed 11/19/2021 9:40 AM Hidalgo County District Clerks Reviewed By: Jesse Castillo SUIT NO. T-0340-19-G HIDALGO COUNTY, EDINBURG § IN THE DISTRICT COURT CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT § SCHOOL DISTRICT, HIDALGO COUNTY § DRAINAGE DISTRICT # 01, HIDALGO § COUNTY EMERGENCY SERVICES § DISTRICT # 03, SANTA CRUZ § IRRIGATION DISTRICT # 15 AND SOUTH § TEXAS COLLEGE, ET AL § § VS. § 370TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT § SUSAN CAMMACK A/K/A SUSAN § REBECCA CAMMACK § HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS JUDGMENT BE IT REMEMBERED that on 22nd day of November, 2021, came on to be heard in regular order the above numbered and entitled cause wherein HIDALGO COUNTY, EDINBURG CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, SOUTH TEXAS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, HIDALGO COUNTY DRAINAGE DISTRICT # 01, HIDALGO COUNTY EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT # 03, SANTA CRUZ IRRIGATION DISTRICT # 15 AND SOUTH TEXAS COLLEGE, are the Plaintiffs; and wherein the Defendant is Susan Cammack a/k/a Susan Rebecca Cammack, who was duly served with process as required by law, and who answered herein pro se and who was duly notified of this setting; and wherein the Defendant is Tony Martin (Lienholder, In Rem Only), if living, and if any or all of the above named defendant(s) be deceased, the unknown heirs of each or all of the said above named deceased persons; and the unknown owner or owners of the following described property; and the executors, administrators, guardians, legal representatives, devisees of the above named persons, and any and all other persons, including adverse claimants, owning or having any legal or equitable interest in or lien upon the below described property, who was duly served as required by law by means of citation by posting; and wherein the Defendant is Paul Robert Andrus (Lienholder, In Rem Only) who was duly served with process as required by law, but wholly failed to appear or answer, and wholly made default, and the Court having appointed Rodolfo Canche, Jr., a licensed attorney, as attorney to represent all of the Defendant(s) named above who were served with process by means of citation by posting, and said attorney ad litem having answered on behalf of all such Defendant(s) who were cited by posting, this cause came on for trial; and Plaintiffs having moved the Court to dismiss from this suit any parties not named above, it was so ordered; and to those Defendant(s) named above who were served with process but failed to appear and answer and made default, and a jury being waived, the parties submitted all matters of controversy, both of fact and of law, to the Court without the intervention of a jury, and the tax records of Plaintiffs were introduced in evidence, and evidence was submitted as to the value of the described Suit No. T-0340-19-G Page 1 Suit Key No. 2459078 Electronically Filed 11/19/2021 9:40 AM Hidalgo County District Clerks Reviewed By: Jesse Castillo property; and the Court, having heard the pleadings, the evidence, and argument of counsel, is of the opinion and finds that the law and the facts are with the Plaintiffs and who are entitled to judgment as follows: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that there is due, owing, and unpaid to Plaintiffs the following amounts of delinquent taxes, accrued penalties, interest, attorney fees and costs for all delinquent years upon the following described property as set out below, together with additional penalties and interest at the rates prescribed by Subchapters A and C of Chapter 33, Property Tax Code, which accrue hereafter on all of said taxes from date of judgment until paid. PROPERTY AND AMOUNTS OWED ACCT. NO. S1700-02-029-0017-00; Lot Seventeen (17), Block Twenty-Nine (29), Santa Cruz Gardens, Unit No. Two (2), Out of the Santa Cruz Ranch in the San Salvador Del Tule Grant, Hidalgo County, Texas, according to the amended map or plat of record in Volume 8, Pages 28- 29, Map Records of Hidalgo County, Texas. Adjudged value: $117,600.00 HIDALGO COUNTY Year(s) Due: 2013 - 2020 $10,729.26 EDINBURG CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Year(s) Due: 2013 - 2020 $22,354.12 SOUTH TEXAS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Year(s) Due: 2013 - 2020 $903.56 HIDALGO COUNTY DRAINAGE DISTRICT # 01 Year(s) Due: 2013 - 2020 $1,785.49 HIDALGO COUNTY EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT # 03 Year(s) Due: 2013 - 2020 $511.74 SANTA CRUZ IRRIGATION DISTRICT # 15 Year(s) Due: 2014 - 2021 $3,588.26 SOUTH TEXAS COLLEGE Year(s) Due: 2013 - 2020 $3,247.97 TOTAL DUE: $43,120.40 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: That Plaintiffs also recover(s) judgment for all costs of suit and sale now or hereafter incurred, including abstractor's fees incurred in securing data and information as to the name, identity, and location of necessary parties and legal description of the above described property in the total amount of $200.00 provided, however, that no personal money judgment is granted against any Defendant named herein unless otherwise provided below. The proceeds of any foreclosure sale in this cause shall be applied first to the payment of all accrued costs of suit and sale, and any residue shall be distributed as provided by law. Suit No. T-0340-19-G Page 2 Suit Key No. 2459078 Electronically Filed 11/19/2021 9:40 AM Hidalgo County District Clerks Reviewed By: Jesse Castillo That HIDALGO COUNTY, EDINBURG CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, SOUTH TEXAS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, HIDALGO COUNTY DRAINAGE DISTRICT # 01, HIDALGO COUNTY EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT # 03, SANTA CRUZ IRRIGATION DISTRICT # 15 and SOUTH TEXAS COLLEGE recover of and from the following named Defendant(s), if any, a personal money judgment in the amount of taxes, penalties, interest, attorneys fees, and costs shown above: Susan Cammack a/k/a Susan Rebecca Cammack; That a lien exists against each of the lots, tracts, or parcels of land, for the amount of the taxes, interest, penalties, abstractor’s fees and costs of court found to be due on each particular lot, tract, or parcel of land, which lien is prior and superior to all claims, right, title, interest, or liens asserted by any Defendant(s), and that Plaintiffs have foreclosure of their liens on each of the lots, tracts, or parcels of land as against the Defendant(s) or any person claiming under the Defendant(s) by any right acquired during the pendency of this suit; That, upon the request of any Plaintiff or Intervening taxing unit, an order of sale be issued by the Clerk directed to the Constable or any Sheriff of this County, commanding such officer to seize, levy upon, and advertise the sale of each of the tracts of land, and sell them to the highest bidder for cash, all to be done as under execution except as otherwise provided by Subchapter A of Chapter 34, TEX. TAX CODE, such order to have all the force and effect of a writ of possession as between the parties to this suit and any person claiming under the defendant(s) by any right acquired pending this suit; That such order of sale provide that the property may be sold to a taxing unit that is a party to this suit or to any other person, other than a person owning an interest in the property or any party to this suit that is not a taxing unit, for (1) the adjudged value of the property as set by this Court in the amount shown above, or (2) the aggregate amount of the judgments against the property, whichever is less; That such order of sale also specify that the property may not be sold to a person owning an interest in the property or to a person who is a party to the suit other than a taxing unit unless: (1) that person is the highest bidder at the tax sale, and (2) the amount bid by that person is equal to or greater than the aggregate amount of the judgments against the property, including all costs of suit and sale; That the net proceeds of any sale of such property made hereunder to any purchaser other than a taxing unit who is a party to this suit shall be applied to satisfy the judgment and liens foreclosed herein, but any excess in the proceeds of sale over the amount of judgment, the costs of suit and sale and other expenses chargeable against the property, shall be paid into the registry of the court and disbursed therefrom as provided by law; That the owner of such property, or anyone having an interest therein, or their heirs, assigns, or legal representatives, may redeem such property in the time and manner prescribed by law; That the officer executing the order of sale shall make proper conveyance to the purchaser(s) of the land, as prescribed by law, subject to such right of redemption, that the clerk of this Court issue a Writ of Possession to the purchaser at the sale or to the purchaser’s assigns no sooner than 20 days following the date on which the purchaser’s deed from the officer making the sale is filed of record; and that the officer charged with executing the writ shall place the purchaser or the purchaser’s assigns in possession of the property without further order from any court and in the manner provided by the writ, subject to any notice to vacate that may be required to be given to a tenant under Section 24.005(b), Property Code. Suit No. T-0340-19-G Page 3 Suit Key No. 2459078 Electronically Filed 11/19/2021 9:40 AM Hidalgo County District Clerks Reviewed By: Jesse Castillo That Rodolfo Canche, Jr., appointed to act as Attorney Ad Litem for Defendant(s) cited by posting, filed his report describing the actions he took to locate and represent the interests of the defendant(s). The Court determined that the actions taken by the Attorney Ad Litem as described in the report were sufficient to discharge the attorney’s duties to the defendant(s). The Attorney Ad Litem is hereby allowed the sum of $850.00 as attorney’s fees, such sum to be taxed as court costs herein, to be paid by Defendant(s). All relief prayed for in any of the pleadings in this cause which is not specifically granted by this judgment is hereby denied. This judgment finally disposes of all parties and all claims and is appealable. SIGNED on _________________________________________________. ______________________________________ Judge Presiding Approved: ________________________________________ Lucy G. Canales State Bar No. 08123075 Michael G. Cano State Bar No. 24047724 Kelly Rivera Salazar State Bar No. 24041785 Jaime E. Gonzalez State Bar No. 24036654 Edinburg.Litigation@lgbs.com Attorney for: Plaintiffs ________________________________________ Rodolfo Canche, Jr. State Bar No. 24040635 pam@canchelaw.com Attorney for Defendant(s) named above who were served by means of citation by posting. Suit No. T-0340-19-G Page 4 Suit Key No. 2459078 Automated Certificate of eService This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system. The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules. Annelle Sanchez on behalf of Kelly Salazar Bar No. 24041785 annelle.sanchez@lgbs.com Envelope ID: 59323484 Status as of 11/19/2021 9:48 AM CST Case Contacts Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status Pam Munoz pam@canchelaw.com 11/19/2021 9:40:35 AM SENT RODOLFO CANCHE RUDYCANCHE@CANCHELAW.COM 11/19/2021 9:40:35 AM SENT