arrow left
arrow right
  • VILLAS AT EMERALD LAKE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC vs. ROYAL OAK HOMES LLC CONSTRUCTION DEFECT-OTHER NEGLIGENCE document preview
  • VILLAS AT EMERALD LAKE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC vs. ROYAL OAK HOMES LLC CONSTRUCTION DEFECT-OTHER NEGLIGENCE document preview
  • VILLAS AT EMERALD LAKE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC vs. ROYAL OAK HOMES LLC CONSTRUCTION DEFECT-OTHER NEGLIGENCE document preview
  • VILLAS AT EMERALD LAKE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC vs. ROYAL OAK HOMES LLC CONSTRUCTION DEFECT-OTHER NEGLIGENCE document preview
  • VILLAS AT EMERALD LAKE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC vs. ROYAL OAK HOMES LLC CONSTRUCTION DEFECT-OTHER NEGLIGENCE document preview
  • VILLAS AT EMERALD LAKE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC vs. ROYAL OAK HOMES LLC CONSTRUCTION DEFECT-OTHER NEGLIGENCE document preview
  • VILLAS AT EMERALD LAKE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC vs. ROYAL OAK HOMES LLC CONSTRUCTION DEFECT-OTHER NEGLIGENCE document preview
  • VILLAS AT EMERALD LAKE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC vs. ROYAL OAK HOMES LLC CONSTRUCTION DEFECT-OTHER NEGLIGENCE document preview
						
                                

Preview

Filing # 152527586 E-Filed 06/30/2022 02:54:42 PM CASE NO.: 2020-CA-002942 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 9TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR OSCEOLA COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 2020-CA-002942 VILLAS AT EMERALD LAKE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida not for profit corporation; Plaintiff, v. ROYAL OAK HOMES, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, ADVANCED WRAPPING AND CONCRETE SOLUTIONS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA, INC., a Florida corporation; DON KING’S CONCRETE, INC., a Florida corporation; HUGH MACDONALD CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Florida corporation; IMPERIAL BUILDING CORPORATION, a Florida corporation; PREMIER PLASTERING OF CENTRAL FLORIDA, INC. N/K/A TGK STUCCO, INC., a Florida corporation; WEATHERMASTER BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC., a Florida corporation; WEINTRAUB INSPECTIONS & FORENSICS, INC. N/K/A WEINTRAUB ENGINEERING AND INSPECTIONS, INC., a Florida corporation; THE DIMILLO GROUP, LLC, a Florida limited liability company; WOLF’S IRRIGATIONS & LANDSCAPING, INC., a Florida corporation; SUMMERPARK HOMES, INC., a Florida corporation; BROWN + COMPANY ARCHITECTURE, INC., a Florida corporation, Defendants. ___________________________________/ ROYAL OAK HOMES, LLC, a Florida limited liability company; Crossclaim Plaintiff, Page 2 of 6 CASE NO.: 2020-CA-002942 v. ADVANCED WRAPPING AND CONCRETE SOLUTIONS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA, INC., a Florida corporation; DON KING’S CONCRETE, INC., a Florida corporation; HUGH MACDONALD CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Florida corporation; IMPERIAL BUILDING CORPORATION, a Florida corporation; PREMIER PLASTERING OF CENTRAL FLORIDA, INC. N/K/A TGK STUCCO, INC., a Florida corporation; WEATHERMASTER BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC., a Florida corporation; WEINTRAUB INSPECTIONS & FORENSICS, INC. N/K/A WEINTRAUB ENGINEERING AND INSPECTIONS, INC., a Florida corporation; WOLF’S IRRIGATIONS & LANDSCAPING, INC., a Florida corporation; SUMMERPARK HOMES, INC., a Florida corporation; BROWN + COMPANY ARCHITECTURE, INC., a Florida corporation, Crossclaim Defendants. ___________________________________/ DON KING’S CONCRETE, INC., a Florida corporation, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. E.R.O. CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Florida corporation; LIOS CONCRETE CORP., a Florida corporation; and ATLANTIC CONCRETE SYSTEMS, INC., a Florida corporation. Third-Party Defendants. ___________________________________/ Page 2 of 6 CASE NO.: 2020-CA-002942 THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT, ATLANTIC CONCRETE SYSTEMS, INC.’S RESPONSE TO BROWN + COMPANY ARCHITECTURE, INC.’S REQUEST TO PRODUCE COMES NOW, Defendant ATLANTIC CONCRETE SYSTEMS, INC, by and through her undersigned counsel and pursuant to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby files it Responses to BROWN + COMPANY ARCHITECTURE, INC’s Request to Produce. DOCUMENTS REQUESTED 1. Any and all contracts You entered into related to the Project. RESPONSE: To the extent that Defendant is in possession of any documents responsive to this request, they will be produced at a mutually agreeable time and location. Upon diligent search, no records have been located at this time. 2. All documents, drawings, specifications or plans prepared by BROWN that You examined or relied upon in performing Your scope of services/work for the Project. RESPONSE: Objection, overbroad, vague, ambiguous, and not reasonably limited in time and scope. Without waiving said objections, upon diligent search, no records have been located at this time. 3. All documents evidencing or detailing any inspections performed by BROWN related to Your scope of work at the Project. RESPONSE: To the extent that Defendant is in possession of any documents responsive to this request, they will be produced at a mutually agreeable time and location. Upon diligent search, no records have been located at this time. 4. All documents evidencing or detailing approvals by BROWN related to Your scope of work at the Project. RESPONSE: To the extent that Defendant is in possession of any documents responsive to this request, they will be produced at a mutually agreeable time and location. Upon diligent search, no records have been located at this time. 5. All documents evidencing, or detailing work accepted by BROWN related to Your scope of work at the Project. RESPONSE: To the extent that Defendant is in possession of any documents responsive to this request, they will be produced at a mutually agreeable time and location. Upon diligent search, no records have been located at this time. Page 2 of 6 CASE NO.: 2020-CA-002942 6. All change orders, change directives, requests for information, or similar documents evidencing changes, modifications, additions, or reductions in Your scope of work at the Project. RESPONSE: To the extent that Defendant is in possession of any documents responsive to this request, they will be produced at a mutually agreeable time and location. Upon diligent search, no records have been located at this time. 7. All correspondence evidencing changes, modifications, additions, or reductions in Your scope of work at the Project. RESPONSE: To the extent that Defendant is in possession of any documents responsive to this request, they will be produced at a mutually agreeable time and location. Upon diligent search, no records have been located at this time. 8. All product submittals, product specifications, installation instructions, maintenance instructions, product manuals, or similar documents for the products, supplies, and building components You installed or constructed at the Project. RESPONSE: To the extent that Defendant is in possession of any documents responsive to this request, they will be produced at a mutually agreeable time and location. Upon diligent search, no records have been located at this time. 9. All correspondence concerning product submittals, product specifications, installation instructions, maintenance instructions, product manuals, or similar documents for the products, supplies, and building components You installed or constructed at the Project. RESPONSE: To the extent that Defendant is in possession of any documents responsive to this request, they will be produced at a mutually agreeable time and location. Upon diligent search, no records have been located at this time. 10. All invoices, requests for payment, work orders, job tickets, and similar documents related to Your scope of work for the Project. RESPONSE: To the extent that Defendant is in possession of any documents responsive to this request, they will be produced at a mutually agreeable time and location. Upon diligent search, no records have been located at this time. 11. Any improper designs and/or specifications that You relied upon at the Project. RESPONSE: None in Defendant’s possession at this time other than the documents produced by other parties. Discovery is ongoing. Page 2 of 6 CASE NO.: 2020-CA-002942 12. All communications between You and BROWN related to the Project. RESPONSE: Defendant ATLANTIC objects to this request on the grounds that it is irrelevant, immaterial, overbroad, unduly burdensome, and seeks information not readily accessible. Defendant ATLANTIC further objects to this request to the extent that it seeks privileged communications. Subject to and without waiving her objections, none at this time other than the documents produced by other parties. Discovery is ongoing. 13. All communications exchanged between You and anyone related to the designs prepared by BROWN for the Project. RESPONSE: Defendant ATLANTIC objects to this request on the grounds that it is irrelevant, immaterial, overbroad, unduly burdensome, and seeks information not readily accessible. Defendant ATLANTIC further objects to this request to the extent that it seeks privileged communications. Subject to and without waiving her objections, none at this time other than the documents produced by other parties. Discovery is ongoing. 14. All communications exchanged between You and ROYAL OAK HOMES, INC. for the Project. RESPONSE: Defendant ATLANTIC objects to this request on the grounds that it is irrelevant, immaterial, overbroad, unduly burdensome, and seeks information not readily accessible. Defendant ATLANTIC further objects to this request to the extent that it seeks privileged communications. Subject to and without waiving her objections, none at this time other than the documents produced by other parties. Discovery is ongoing. 15. All plans, product submittals, designs, construction plans, specifications, or similar documents and information transmitted or submitted by You to the Osceola County Building Department for the Project. RESPONSE: Objection, public record. 16. All permit applications and any related attachments or documents submitted by You to the Osceola County Building Department for the Project. RESPONSE: Objection, public record. 17. All permit applications any related attachments or other documents submitted by You to any other authority having jurisdiction for the Project. RESPONSE: Objection, public record. Page 2 of 6