arrow left
arrow right
  • REGINA GLORIOSO-EMERSON, et al  vs.  CITY OF MILLBRAE, et al(23) Unlimited Other PI/PD/WD document preview
  • REGINA GLORIOSO-EMERSON, et al  vs.  CITY OF MILLBRAE, et al(23) Unlimited Other PI/PD/WD document preview
  • REGINA GLORIOSO-EMERSON, et al  vs.  CITY OF MILLBRAE, et al(23) Unlimited Other PI/PD/WD document preview
  • REGINA GLORIOSO-EMERSON, et al  vs.  CITY OF MILLBRAE, et al(23) Unlimited Other PI/PD/WD document preview
  • REGINA GLORIOSO-EMERSON, et al  vs.  CITY OF MILLBRAE, et al(23) Unlimited Other PI/PD/WD document preview
  • REGINA GLORIOSO-EMERSON, et al  vs.  CITY OF MILLBRAE, et al(23) Unlimited Other PI/PD/WD document preview
  • REGINA GLORIOSO-EMERSON, et al  vs.  CITY OF MILLBRAE, et al(23) Unlimited Other PI/PD/WD document preview
  • REGINA GLORIOSO-EMERSON, et al  vs.  CITY OF MILLBRAE, et al(23) Unlimited Other PI/PD/WD document preview
						
                                

Preview

KENNETH D. SIMONCINI, ESQ. (II145586) ERIC STEINLE, ESQ. (II201117) SIMONCINI & ASSOCIATES Attorneys At Law 1694 The Alameda San Jose, CA 95126-2219 Telephone: (408) 280-7711 Facsimile: (408) 280-1330 Email: kds@simoncini-law.corn Attorneys for Defendants, SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS BOARD IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 11 12 REGINA GLORIOSO-EMERSON; ESTATE Case No.: 22-CIV-05181 OF ROLANDO GLORIOSO; CHRISTIAN 13 CUNANAN; KATRYNE PIOQUINTO; SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSIT JOHN MATTHEW CUNANAN; and DISTRICT AND PENINSULA 14 ESTATE OF SUSANA GLORIOSO, CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS BOARD Plaintiffs, INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT 15 STATEMENT vs. 16 Complaint Filed: December 9, 2022 17 CITY OF MILLBRAE; STATE OF Trial Date: None Set CALIFORNIA; CITY AND COUNTY OF 18 SAN FRANCISCO; COUNTY OF SAN Judge: Hon. Robert D. Foiles MATEO; CITY OF SAN BRUNO; SAN Dept.: 21 19 FRANCISCO AREA RAPID TRANSIT 20 DISTRICT; SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT; PENINSULA 21 CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS BOARD, and DOES I — 20, 22 Defendants. 24 SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT AND PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT 25 POWERS BOARD INITIAL CASK MANAGEMENT STATEMENT 26 The San Mateo County Transit District ("Sam Trans") and Peninsula Corridor Joint 27 Powers Board ("Pencor") respectfully submit the following initial case management statement 28 for the case management conference set for March 24, 2023. 1 INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT (PENCOR, SAMTRANS) 1 a. Status of the Pleadings and service of process upon all named parties 2 Sam Trans and Pencor are defendants and cross-complainants. Their cross-complaint names BART and Millbrae, to which Sam Trans and Pencor tendered their defense after being 4 served but before answering. The cross-complaint was filed when there was no response to the s tenders. b. Status of Discovery, including the initial production of documents by all parties, and depositions of the Plaintiff and of Defendant's PMK(s) 8 BART served form interrogatories and production demands on the plaintiffs, seeking 9 some basic damages information. 10 The San Mateo County Sheriff's Department General Case Report lists 39 persons who were present at the accident scene (sheriff's department, coroner, various fire departments), as iz well as at least four eyewitnesses to the events. The decedents'ehicle is reportedly in the possession of the sheriff. 14 There are four wrongful-death plaintiffs. Discovery will entail damages and liability depositions, once the pleadings have been settled. 17 There have been no demands since the tort claims were filed. Those demands basically track the allegations of the complaint and make identical more than $ 10,000,000 demands for 1 9 each wrongful-death plaintiff and for the two estates'urvival claims. z0 c. Status of Settlement or Mediation 21 Premature d. Conclusions reached after meet and confer on all matters set forth in CRC Rule 3.750 and Rule 3.724(8) 24 The parties were unable to schedule a live meet-and-confer. Sam Trans and Pencor respond as follows: 26 (1) Whether all parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint have been served, have 27 appeared, or have been dismissed 28 1NlTIAL CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT (PENCOR, SAMTRANS) As noted above, at {a), the pleadings are still unsettled. The plaintiffs represent that they have scsi ed all named defendants. (2) Whether any additional parties may be added or the pleadings may be amended It is not clear what further parties may be available to be added, but Sam Trans and Pencor do not at present anticipate additional cross-defendants. (3) The deadline for the filing of any remaining pleadings and service of any additional parties As noted above, at (a), the pleadings are still unsettled. (4) Whether severance, consolidation, or coordination with other actions is desirable 10 There does not appear at present to be any reason to consider these. (5) The schedule for discovery proceedings to avoid duplication and whether discovery 12 should be stayed until all parties have been brought into the case 13 This should be addressed while the pleadings are settling. In the meantime, some 14 preliminary damages discovery has been served on the plaintiffs. (6) The schedule for settlement conferences or alternative dispute resolution 16 This is premature. 17 {7) Whether to appoint liaison or lead counsel There seems to be no reason to do this. 19 (8) The date for the filing of any dispositive motions 20 It appears that one party seeks to demur to the complaint. It seems too early to consider a 21 schedule for motions for summary judgment. 22 (9) The creation of preliminary and updated lists of the persons to be deposed and the 23 subjects to be addressed in each deposition This should be addressed while the pleadings are settled. Sec further comments above, at 25 (10) The exchange of documents and whether to establish an electronic document depository 26 This remains to be determined and should be discussed at the case management 27 conference. 3 INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT (PENCOR, SAMTRANS) ] (11) Whether a special master should be appointed and the purposes for such appointment 2 This issue is premature. (12) Whether to establish a case-based Web site and other means to provide a current master 4 list of addresses and telephone numbers of counsel 5 This is not a class action. (13) The schedule for further conferences 7 See below, at (g). e. Proposed briefing schedule and hearing date on Plaintiffs Motion for Class 9 Certification and what specific discovery is still needed to prepare the motion or opposition ]P This is not a class action. f. Any anticipated motions and proposed briefing schedule; 12 None at this time g. Setting of next CMC date ]4 The pleadings are still somewhat unsettled. Once the status of each party is clarified, which should happen at or shortly after this conference, there will be both liability and damages &hscovery to pursue. To allow this, SamTrans and Pencor respectfully suggest setting the next ]7 conference out at least I 20 days. During that time, it should be possible to depose the wrongful- death plaintiffs and begin basic liability investigation and discovery. That will allow the parties 9 who will actually defend these claims to assess exposure and determine the feasibility of 2p settlement. h. Any other matters for which the parties seek Court ruling or scheduling. 22 None at this time. 23 Dated: March 20, 2023 SIJ@ONCINI A ASSOCIATES By: 25 'kENNETH D. SIMONCINI ERIC STEINLE 26 Attorneys for Defendants SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSIT 27 DISTRICT and PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS BOARD 4 INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT (PENCOR, SAMTRANS) Gtotvoso-Emerson, et al. v. Ctty of Mtllinas, et al. San Mateo County Superi or Court Case No. 22-CIV-1 57 SI 1 PROOF OF SERVICE 2 I certify and declare as follows: I am over the age of 18 years, and not a party to the within action. My business address is 1694 The Alameda, San Jose, California 95126, which is located in the county where the mailing described below took place. On the date listed below, I 4 served the CAASE MANANGMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope and served in the manner and/or manners described below to each of the parties herein and addressed as stated below: SEE A TTA CIIED SER VICE I.IST m ]2 ~ — I I United States Postal Service, U.S. Mail, with First Class postage prepaid and deposited in sealed envelope at San Jose, California. I am readily familiar with the business practice at my place of business for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service. Conespondence so collected and processed is deposited with the United States Postal Service that same day in the ordinary course of business. 15 16 O Electronic Transmission: 17 1S o Hand-Delivery by Courier: I certify and declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that 2o the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on March 20, 2023 f KCM&tf/totMi. NANETTE MARIE LEUC N, 22 23 24 25 27 PROOF OF SERV1CE Glorioso-Emerson, et ai. u City of Mrllbrae, et al. Sao Mateo County Superior Court Case 7Vo. 22-CIV-051st SER VICE LIST Robert Ounjian Lemuel L. Garcia robert cz.law LEM GARCIA LAW, PC CARPENTER 8c ZUCKERMAN 1em@lemgarcialaw. corn 8827 West Olytnpic Boulevard 1720 West Catneron Avenue, Suite 210 Beverly Hills, CA 90211 West Covina, CA 91790 Telephone: (310) 273-1230 Telephone: (626) 337-1111 Facsimile: (310) 858-1063 Facsimile: (626) 337-1112 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Plaintiffs 7 Kevin E. Gilbert, Esq. Todd H. Master 8 kgilbertcaohhlegal. corn RIDLEY MASTER JiEun Choi tinaster@hnmlaw. corn 0 j echoi@ohhl egal, corn Faith Kelly Elena LaBella FKelly hrmrlaw.corn 10 Elabella@ohhlegal. corn 1900 O'Farrell Street, Suite 280 11 Jennifer Garcia San Mateo, CA 94403 j garcia@ohhleagal. corn Telephone: (650) 365-7715 12 ORBACH HUFF k. HENDERSON LLP Facsimile: (650) 364-5297 6200 Stoneridge Mall Road, Suite 225 Attorneys for Defendant City of Millbrae 13 Pleasanton, CA 94588 14 Telephone: (510) 999-7908 Clmstopher Nevis Facsimile: (510) 999-7918 Clmstopher. Nevisgai ewisbrisbois. corn 15 Attorneys for Defendant, Steffanie A. Malla City of San Bruno Steffanie.Mails lewisbrisbois.corn 16 lucia. suazo Qalewisbri sboi s. corn 17 Eric E. Holbrook LEWIS BRISMOIS BISGAARD k. SMITH LLP G. Michael Harrington 45 Fremont Street, Suite 3000 18 Samuel C. Law San Francisco, CA 94105 Samuel.c.law(ed dot. ca. gov Telephone: (415) 362-2580 California Department of Transportation Facsimile: (415) 434-0882 20 Legal Division 111 Grand Avenue, Suite 11-100 21 Oakland, CA 94612-3717 Mailing Address; P.O. Box 24323 22 Oakland, CA 94623 23 Telephone: (510) 433-9100 Facsimile: (510)433-9167 24 Attorneys for Defendant State of California 25 Acting by and tlnough the Department of Transportation 26 San Mateo County Superior Court Department 21 27 Email: Complexcivil@sanmateocourt.org Email: dept21@sanmateocourt.org Courtesy Copy per Court Order PROOF OF SERVICE