On December 09, 2022 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Cunanan, Christian,
Cunanan, John Matthew,
Estate Of Rolando Glorioso,
Estate Of Susana Glorioso,
Glorioso-Emerson, Regina,
Pioquinto, Katryne,
Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board,
San Francisco Area Rapid Transit District,
San Mateo County Transit District,
and
Bay Area Transit Consultants,
Bechtel-Parsons Brinckerhoff-Todd-Warren,
C&B Consulting Engineers,
City And County Of San Francisco,
City Of Millbrae,
City Of San Bruno,
County Of San Mateo,
Does 1-20,
Finger & Moy Architects,
Hntb Corporation,
Intelli-Tech,
Jiu Korve Associates,
Manna Consultants, Inc.,
Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board,
San Francisco Area Rapid Transit District,
San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District,
San Mateo County Transit District,
Scott Co. Of California,
Scott-Norman Mechanical, Inc.,
Slg Brisbane Mechanical Co. Jv,
State Of California,
Thomas K. Dyer, Inc.,
Tutor-Saliba Slattery,
Tutor-Saliba Slattery Jv,
Valley Power Systems North, Inc.,
West Yost Associates,
for (23) Unlimited Other PI/PD/WD
in the District Court of San Mateo County.
Preview
KENNETH D. SIMONCINI, ESQ. (II145586)
ERIC STEINLE, ESQ. (II201117)
SIMONCINI & ASSOCIATES
Attorneys At Law
1694 The Alameda
San Jose, CA 95126-2219
Telephone: (408) 280-7711
Facsimile: (408) 280-1330
Email: kds@simoncini-law.corn
Attorneys for Defendants,
SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT
PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS BOARD
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
10
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
11
12
REGINA GLORIOSO-EMERSON; ESTATE Case No.: 22-CIV-05181
OF ROLANDO GLORIOSO; CHRISTIAN
13
CUNANAN; KATRYNE PIOQUINTO; SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSIT
JOHN MATTHEW CUNANAN; and DISTRICT AND PENINSULA
14
ESTATE OF SUSANA GLORIOSO, CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS BOARD
Plaintiffs, INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT
15
STATEMENT
vs.
16
Complaint Filed: December 9, 2022
17
CITY OF MILLBRAE; STATE OF Trial Date: None Set
CALIFORNIA; CITY AND COUNTY OF
18 SAN FRANCISCO; COUNTY OF SAN Judge: Hon. Robert D. Foiles
MATEO; CITY OF SAN BRUNO; SAN Dept.: 21
19
FRANCISCO AREA RAPID TRANSIT
20
DISTRICT; SAN MATEO COUNTY
TRANSIT DISTRICT; PENINSULA
21 CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS BOARD, and
DOES I — 20,
22
Defendants.
24 SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT AND PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT
25 POWERS BOARD INITIAL CASK MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
26 The San Mateo County Transit District ("Sam Trans") and Peninsula Corridor Joint
27 Powers Board ("Pencor") respectfully submit the following initial case management statement
28 for the case management conference set for March 24, 2023.
1
INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT (PENCOR, SAMTRANS)
1 a. Status of the Pleadings and service of process upon all named parties
2 Sam Trans and Pencor are defendants and cross-complainants. Their cross-complaint
names BART and Millbrae, to which Sam Trans and Pencor tendered their defense after being
4 served but before answering. The cross-complaint was filed when there was no response to the
s tenders.
b. Status of Discovery, including the initial production of documents by all parties, and
depositions of the Plaintiff and of Defendant's PMK(s)
8 BART served form interrogatories and production demands on the plaintiffs, seeking
9 some basic damages information.
10 The San Mateo County Sheriff's Department General Case Report lists 39 persons who
were present at the accident scene (sheriff's department, coroner, various fire departments), as
iz well as at least four eyewitnesses to the events. The decedents'ehicle is reportedly in the
possession of the sheriff.
14 There are four wrongful-death plaintiffs.
Discovery will entail damages and liability depositions, once the pleadings have been
settled.
17
There have been no demands since the tort claims were filed. Those demands basically
track the allegations of the complaint and make identical more than $ 10,000,000 demands for
1 9
each wrongful-death plaintiff and for the two estates'urvival claims.
z0
c. Status of Settlement or Mediation
21
Premature
d. Conclusions reached after meet and confer on all matters set forth in CRC Rule 3.750
and Rule 3.724(8)
24
The parties were unable to schedule a live meet-and-confer. Sam Trans and Pencor
respond as follows:
26
(1) Whether all parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint have been served, have
27
appeared, or have been dismissed
28
1NlTIAL CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT (PENCOR, SAMTRANS)
As noted above, at {a), the pleadings are still unsettled. The plaintiffs represent that they
have scsi ed all named defendants.
(2) Whether any additional parties may be added or the pleadings may be amended
It is not clear what further parties may be available to be added, but Sam Trans and
Pencor do not at present anticipate additional cross-defendants.
(3) The deadline for the filing of any remaining pleadings and service of any additional
parties
As noted above, at (a), the pleadings are still unsettled.
(4) Whether severance, consolidation, or coordination with other actions is desirable
10 There does not appear at present to be any reason to consider these.
(5) The schedule for discovery proceedings to avoid duplication and whether discovery
12 should be stayed until all parties have been brought into the case
13 This should be addressed while the pleadings are settling. In the meantime, some
14 preliminary damages discovery has been served on the plaintiffs.
(6) The schedule for settlement conferences or alternative dispute resolution
16
This is premature.
17 {7) Whether to appoint liaison or lead counsel
There seems to be no reason to do this.
19 (8) The date for the filing of any dispositive motions
20
It appears that one party seeks to demur to the complaint. It seems too early to consider a
21
schedule for motions for summary judgment.
22 (9) The creation of preliminary and updated lists of the persons to be deposed and the
23
subjects to be addressed in each deposition
This should be addressed while the pleadings are settled. Sec further comments above, at
25
(10) The exchange of documents and whether to establish an electronic document depository
26
This remains to be determined and should be discussed at the case management
27
conference.
3
INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT (PENCOR, SAMTRANS)
] (11) Whether a special master should be appointed and the purposes for such appointment
2 This issue is premature.
(12) Whether to establish a case-based Web site and other means to provide a current master
4 list of addresses and telephone numbers of counsel
5 This is not a class action.
(13) The schedule for further conferences
7 See below, at (g).
e. Proposed briefing schedule and hearing date on Plaintiffs Motion for Class
9 Certification and what specific discovery is still needed to prepare the motion or opposition
]P This is not a class action.
f. Any anticipated motions and proposed briefing schedule;
12 None at this time
g. Setting of next CMC date
]4 The pleadings are still somewhat unsettled. Once the status of each party is clarified,
which should happen at or shortly after this conference, there will be both liability and damages
&hscovery to pursue. To allow this, SamTrans and Pencor respectfully suggest setting the next
]7
conference out at least I 20 days. During that time, it should be possible to depose the wrongful-
death plaintiffs and begin basic liability investigation and discovery. That will allow the parties
9
who will actually defend these claims to assess exposure and determine the feasibility of
2p
settlement.
h. Any other matters for which the parties seek Court ruling or scheduling.
22
None at this time.
23
Dated: March 20, 2023 SIJ@ONCINI A ASSOCIATES
By:
25 'kENNETH D. SIMONCINI
ERIC STEINLE
26 Attorneys for Defendants
SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSIT
27
DISTRICT and
PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT
POWERS BOARD
4
INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT (PENCOR, SAMTRANS)
Gtotvoso-Emerson, et al. v. Ctty of Mtllinas, et al.
San Mateo County Superi or Court Case No. 22-CIV-1 57 SI
1 PROOF OF SERVICE
2
I certify and declare as follows: I am over the age of 18 years, and not a party to the
within action. My business address is 1694 The Alameda, San Jose, California 95126, which is
located in the county where the mailing described below took place. On the date listed below, I
4
served the
CAASE MANANGMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT
by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope and served in the manner and/or
manners described below to each of the parties herein and addressed as stated below:
SEE A TTA CIIED SER VICE I.IST
m
]2
~
—
I I
United States Postal Service, U.S. Mail, with First Class postage prepaid and deposited
in sealed envelope at San Jose, California. I am readily familiar with the business
practice at my place of business for collection and processing of correspondence for
mailing with the United States Postal Service. Conespondence so collected and
processed is deposited with the United States Postal Service that same day in the
ordinary course of business.
15
16 O Electronic Transmission:
17
1S
o Hand-Delivery by Courier:
I certify and declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that
2o the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on March 20, 2023 f KCM&tf/totMi.
NANETTE MARIE LEUC
N,
22
23
24
25
27
PROOF OF SERV1CE
Glorioso-Emerson, et ai. u City of Mrllbrae, et al.
Sao Mateo County Superior Court Case 7Vo. 22-CIV-051st
SER VICE LIST
Robert Ounjian Lemuel L. Garcia
robert cz.law LEM GARCIA LAW, PC
CARPENTER 8c ZUCKERMAN 1em@lemgarcialaw. corn
8827 West Olytnpic Boulevard 1720 West Catneron Avenue, Suite 210
Beverly Hills, CA 90211 West Covina, CA 91790
Telephone: (310) 273-1230 Telephone: (626) 337-1111
Facsimile: (310) 858-1063 Facsimile: (626) 337-1112
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Plaintiffs
7 Kevin E. Gilbert, Esq. Todd H. Master
8
kgilbertcaohhlegal. corn RIDLEY MASTER
JiEun Choi tinaster@hnmlaw. corn
0 j echoi@ohhl egal, corn Faith Kelly
Elena LaBella FKelly hrmrlaw.corn
10
Elabella@ohhlegal. corn 1900 O'Farrell Street, Suite 280
11
Jennifer Garcia San Mateo, CA 94403
j garcia@ohhleagal. corn Telephone: (650) 365-7715
12 ORBACH HUFF k. HENDERSON LLP Facsimile: (650) 364-5297
6200 Stoneridge Mall Road, Suite 225 Attorneys for Defendant City of Millbrae
13
Pleasanton, CA 94588
14
Telephone: (510) 999-7908 Clmstopher Nevis
Facsimile: (510) 999-7918 Clmstopher. Nevisgai ewisbrisbois. corn
15 Attorneys for Defendant, Steffanie A. Malla
City of San Bruno Steffanie.Mails lewisbrisbois.corn
16
lucia. suazo Qalewisbri sboi s. corn
17 Eric E. Holbrook LEWIS BRISMOIS BISGAARD k. SMITH LLP
G. Michael Harrington 45 Fremont Street, Suite 3000
18 Samuel C. Law San Francisco, CA 94105
Samuel.c.law(ed dot. ca. gov Telephone: (415) 362-2580
California Department of Transportation Facsimile: (415) 434-0882
20 Legal Division
111 Grand Avenue, Suite 11-100
21 Oakland, CA 94612-3717
Mailing Address; P.O. Box 24323
22
Oakland, CA 94623
23 Telephone: (510) 433-9100
Facsimile: (510)433-9167
24 Attorneys for Defendant State of California
25
Acting by and tlnough the Department of Transportation
26 San Mateo County Superior Court
Department 21
27 Email: Complexcivil@sanmateocourt.org
Email: dept21@sanmateocourt.org
Courtesy Copy per Court Order
PROOF OF SERVICE