On August 11, 2021 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Bunting Annette,
Praetorian Insurance Company,
and
Rojo Felizardo Ayala,
Rojo Trucking,
for Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death - Uninsured Motorist (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Civil Division
Central District, Spring Street Courthouse, Department 31
21STCV29602 June 9, 2022
ANNETTE BUNTING vs FELIZARDO AYALA ROJO, et al. 1:30 PM
Commissioner: Honorable Paul Bruguera CSR: None
Judicial Assistant: J. Almanza ERM: None
Courtroom Assistant: None Deputy Sheriff: None
APPEARANCES:
For Plaintiff(s): No Appearances
For Defendant(s): No Appearances
Other Appearance Notes: Nizar M. Abed for Praetorian Insurance Company (Non-Party) via
(LACOURTCONNECT)
NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: Hearing on Motion for Leave to Intervene
The Court’s tentative ruling is posted online for the parties to review.
It is hereby stipulated by Praetorian Insurance Company that this matter may be heard by
Commissioner Paul Bruguera for this proceeding.
The matter is not called for hearing.
Praetorian Insurance Company submits to the Court’s tentative ruling this.
After reading and considering all moving documents, the Court adopts its tentative ruling as the
final order of the Court, as follows:
The unopposed NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION OF PRAETORIAN INSURANCE
COMPANY FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE filed by Praetorian Insurance Company, Annette
Bunting on 04/19/2022 is Granted.
Plaintiff Annette Bunting (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against Defendants Felizardo Ayala Rojo
and Rojo Trucking for damages arising from a motor vehicle accident.
Praetorian Insurance Company (“Praetorian”) moves for leave to intervene in this action.
Praetorian attests Plaintiff, at the time of the incident, was in the course and scope of his
employment with Praetorian’s insured. Praetorian asserts that as the workers’ compensation
insurance carrier for Plaintiff’s employer, it has paid benefits to and on behalf of Plaintiff.
Labor Code §§ 3852 and 3853 make clear that an employer against whom a claim for worker’s
Minute Order Page 1 of 2
Document Filed Date
June 09, 2022
Case Filing Date
August 11, 2021
Category
Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death - Uninsured Motorist (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 05/18/2023
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Civil Division Central District, Spring Street Courthouse, Department 31 21STCV29602 June 9, 2022 ANNETTE BUNTING vs FELIZARDO AYALA ROJO, et al. 1:30 PM Commissioner: Honorable Paul Bruguera CSR: None Judicial Assistant: J. Almanza ERM: None Courtroom Assistant: None Deputy Sheriff: None APPEARANCES: For Plaintiff(s): No Appearances For Defendant(s): No Appearances Other Appearance Notes: Nizar M. Abed for Praetorian Insurance Company (Non-Party) via (LACOURTCONNECT) NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: Hearing on Motion for Leave to Intervene The Court’s tentative ruling is posted online for the parties to review. It is hereby stipulated by Praetorian Insurance Company that this matter may be heard by Commissioner Paul Bruguera for this proceeding. The matter is not called for hearing. Praetorian Insurance Company submits to the Court’s tentative ruling this. After reading and considering all moving documents, the Court adopts its tentative ruling as the final order of the Court, as follows: The unopposed NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION OF PRAETORIAN INSURANCE COMPANY FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE filed by Praetorian Insurance Company, Annette Bunting on 04/19/2022 is Granted. Plaintiff Annette Bunting (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against Defendants Felizardo Ayala Rojo and Rojo Trucking for damages arising from a motor vehicle accident. Praetorian Insurance Company (“Praetorian”) moves for leave to intervene in this action. Praetorian attests Plaintiff, at the time of the incident, was in the course and scope of his employment with Praetorian’s insured. Praetorian asserts that as the workers’ compensation insurance carrier for Plaintiff’s employer, it has paid benefits to and on behalf of Plaintiff. Labor Code §§ 3852 and 3853 make clear that an employer against whom a claim for worker’s Minute Order Page 1 of 2