arrow left
arrow right
  • Jpmorgan Chase Bank, National Association, Successor In Interest By Purchase From The Federal Doposit Insurance Corporation As Receiver Of Washington Mutual Bank F/K/A Washington Mutual Bank, Fa, Successor In Interest To North American Mortgage Company v. Peter K. Mckenzie, Sherrel Farnesworth A/K/A SHERREL A. FARNSWORTH, Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Rab Performance Recoveries, Llc, American Express Bank Fsb, Capital One Bank, City Of New York Transit Adjudication Bureau, New York City Environmental Control Board, Nyc Department Of Finance-Parking Violations Bureau, John Doe And Jane Doe Foreclosure (residential mortgage) document preview
  • Jpmorgan Chase Bank, National Association, Successor In Interest By Purchase From The Federal Doposit Insurance Corporation As Receiver Of Washington Mutual Bank F/K/A Washington Mutual Bank, Fa, Successor In Interest To North American Mortgage Company v. Peter K. Mckenzie, Sherrel Farnesworth A/K/A SHERREL A. FARNSWORTH, Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Rab Performance Recoveries, Llc, American Express Bank Fsb, Capital One Bank, City Of New York Transit Adjudication Bureau, New York City Environmental Control Board, Nyc Department Of Finance-Parking Violations Bureau, John Doe And Jane Doe Foreclosure (residential mortgage) document preview
  • Jpmorgan Chase Bank, National Association, Successor In Interest By Purchase From The Federal Doposit Insurance Corporation As Receiver Of Washington Mutual Bank F/K/A Washington Mutual Bank, Fa, Successor In Interest To North American Mortgage Company v. Peter K. Mckenzie, Sherrel Farnesworth A/K/A SHERREL A. FARNSWORTH, Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Rab Performance Recoveries, Llc, American Express Bank Fsb, Capital One Bank, City Of New York Transit Adjudication Bureau, New York City Environmental Control Board, Nyc Department Of Finance-Parking Violations Bureau, John Doe And Jane Doe Foreclosure (residential mortgage) document preview
  • Jpmorgan Chase Bank, National Association, Successor In Interest By Purchase From The Federal Doposit Insurance Corporation As Receiver Of Washington Mutual Bank F/K/A Washington Mutual Bank, Fa, Successor In Interest To North American Mortgage Company v. Peter K. Mckenzie, Sherrel Farnesworth A/K/A SHERREL A. FARNSWORTH, Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Rab Performance Recoveries, Llc, American Express Bank Fsb, Capital One Bank, City Of New York Transit Adjudication Bureau, New York City Environmental Control Board, Nyc Department Of Finance-Parking Violations Bureau, John Doe And Jane Doe Foreclosure (residential mortgage) document preview
  • Jpmorgan Chase Bank, National Association, Successor In Interest By Purchase From The Federal Doposit Insurance Corporation As Receiver Of Washington Mutual Bank F/K/A Washington Mutual Bank, Fa, Successor In Interest To North American Mortgage Company v. Peter K. Mckenzie, Sherrel Farnesworth A/K/A SHERREL A. FARNSWORTH, Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Rab Performance Recoveries, Llc, American Express Bank Fsb, Capital One Bank, City Of New York Transit Adjudication Bureau, New York City Environmental Control Board, Nyc Department Of Finance-Parking Violations Bureau, John Doe And Jane Doe Foreclosure (residential mortgage) document preview
  • Jpmorgan Chase Bank, National Association, Successor In Interest By Purchase From The Federal Doposit Insurance Corporation As Receiver Of Washington Mutual Bank F/K/A Washington Mutual Bank, Fa, Successor In Interest To North American Mortgage Company v. Peter K. Mckenzie, Sherrel Farnesworth A/K/A SHERREL A. FARNSWORTH, Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Rab Performance Recoveries, Llc, American Express Bank Fsb, Capital One Bank, City Of New York Transit Adjudication Bureau, New York City Environmental Control Board, Nyc Department Of Finance-Parking Violations Bureau, John Doe And Jane Doe Foreclosure (residential mortgage) document preview
  • Jpmorgan Chase Bank, National Association, Successor In Interest By Purchase From The Federal Doposit Insurance Corporation As Receiver Of Washington Mutual Bank F/K/A Washington Mutual Bank, Fa, Successor In Interest To North American Mortgage Company v. Peter K. Mckenzie, Sherrel Farnesworth A/K/A SHERREL A. FARNSWORTH, Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Rab Performance Recoveries, Llc, American Express Bank Fsb, Capital One Bank, City Of New York Transit Adjudication Bureau, New York City Environmental Control Board, Nyc Department Of Finance-Parking Violations Bureau, John Doe And Jane Doe Foreclosure (residential mortgage) document preview
  • Jpmorgan Chase Bank, National Association, Successor In Interest By Purchase From The Federal Doposit Insurance Corporation As Receiver Of Washington Mutual Bank F/K/A Washington Mutual Bank, Fa, Successor In Interest To North American Mortgage Company v. Peter K. Mckenzie, Sherrel Farnesworth A/K/A SHERREL A. FARNSWORTH, Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Rab Performance Recoveries, Llc, American Express Bank Fsb, Capital One Bank, City Of New York Transit Adjudication Bureau, New York City Environmental Control Board, Nyc Department Of Finance-Parking Violations Bureau, John Doe And Jane Doe Foreclosure (residential mortgage) document preview
						
                                

Preview

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/10/2023 12:13 PM INDEX NO. 506027/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 329 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2023 EXHIBIT Q FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/10/2023 12:13 PM INDEX NO. 506027/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 329 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2023 Supreme Court of the State of New York, at a IAS Part of the Supreme Court, Kings County located at 360 Adams Street, Brooklyn, New York 11201 on the day of October 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KING JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST BY PURCHASE FROM FDIC, Plaintiff, INDEX NUMBER: 506027/2014 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE -against- PETER MCKENZlE, SHERREL FARNSWORTH et. al Defendants. X Upon reading and filing the annexed affirmation of Kevin H. Spikes, Esq. duly affirmed on the day of October 2019 and affidavit of Sherrell Farnsworth sworn to on the¾Óay of October 2019 the exhibits thereto, and upon all the prior pleadings and proceedings heretofore had herein, LET the Defendant(s) Peter McKenzie and JP Morgan Chase Bank, successor in interest by purchase from FDIC and counsel for the Defendant(s) show cause before this Court, at I.A.S Part before Justice ____ at the courthouse located at 360 Adams Street, Brooklyn, New York, Room , on the day of November 2019 at 9:30 a.m., o'clock in the forenoon of that day, or as soon thereafter as counsel can be heard, why an Order should not be entered: 1. Staying the Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank and/or their agents, and the Referee, from seeking to enforce the terms of the order and judgment of foreclosure and sale by selling and/or transferring title to the property known as 240 Greene Avenue, Brooklyn, New York 11238 under the instant action; FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/10/2023 12:13 PM INDEX NO. 506027/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 329 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2023 2. Staying the instant proceeding pending the completion of the sale of subject property. 3. For such other and further relief as to the court seems just and proper. ORDERED that PENDING a determination of this application the Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank, its agents and assigns and the Referee are stayed from auctioning, selling, and/or transferring any interest in the subject property located at 240 Greene Avenue, Brook.Iyn, NY. LET service of a copy of this Order and the papers upon which it is based by personal service upon Fein, Such and Crane, Attorneys for Defendant, the Referee and Defendant Mckenzie and by personal service/or by overnight mailing on or before be deemed good and sufficient. ENTER: J.S.C Dated: October , 2019 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/10/2023 12:13 PM INDEX NO. 506027/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 329 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KING X JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST BY PURCHASE FROM FDIC, Plaintiff, AFFIRMATION INDEX NUMBER: 506027/2014 -against- PETER MCKENZIE, SHERREL FARNSWORTH et al Defendants. X Kevin H. Spikes, Esq. partner to the Firm of Thomas & Spikes, Esqs. an attorney duly admitted to practice law before the courts of the State of New York do hereby affirm the following under penalties of perjury. 1. I submit this affirmation in support of the defendant's Sherrel Farnsworth's Order to Show Cause seeking to stay the instant foreclosure action and staying the imminent auction of the subject property currently scheduled for October 31, 2019. Plaintiff seeks this relief on grounds pursuant to CPLR 2201- a court a proceeding "upon such terms as be may stay may just." 2. I have discovered, by reviewing the notice of sale on the NYS Court's website that the property is scheduled for sale on October 31, 2019. The property is in a prime location here in Brooklyn. The foreclosure action was commenced on July 1, 2014 and a Judgment of Foreclosure was entered against defendants on March 2018. Exhibits: A - judgment of 28, foreclosure and Sale. 3. Upon information and belief, the requested relief is appropriately sought before this FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/10/2023 12:13 PM INDEX NO. 506027/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 329 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2023 court because defendant Farnsworth (whose name does appear on note), and the co-defendant Peter McKenzie, the individual who is named on the Note, Mortgage and Deed (as a 1% interest stakeholder, only) stymied her efforts to sell the property and/or seek a modification because of his refusal to negotiate in good faith with respect to his one percent interest. Exhibit B, copy of deed. 4. As a result, plaintiff commenced a partition action Sherrell Farnsworth v. Peter McKenzie, JP Morgan Chase Bank in interest by purchase from FDIC, Index No.3346/2015 against defendant McKenzie and that action was settled per stipulation spread across the record on July 11, 2019 wherein the defendant McKenzie has agreed by stipulation of settlement to accept the sum of $120,000 for any and all interest he possesses in the subject premises. Additionally, McKenzie agreed to allow Farnsworth to sell the subject premises to ensure that both the plaintiff's mortgage is satisfied and that McKenzie's settlement is paid as per the agreement. The Court has to date not provided a written order to this effect, but your counsel appeared on that date. Exhibit C, copy of the ecourt screen showing marking "settled trial." before 5. As a result of this agreement, defendant Farnsworth is currently free to sell the subject property, pay off the mortgage and satisfy the agreement with the co-defendant McKenzie. 6. Upon information and belief, plaintiff purchased the subject property in the year 2000. Plaintiff invested a substantial amount of money in purchase and renovaton the property. Defendant Mckenzie was not part of the initial purchase of the property. Defendant McKenzie assisted plaintiff in a refinance of her first loan in 2001. FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/10/2023 12:13 PM INDEX NO. 506027/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 329 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2023 7. Upon information and belief, defendant Farnsworth procured a purchaser for the subject premises for the sum of $1,242,000.00 with an expected closing date within 60 days and there is a down payment of $42,000.00. Exhibit D. 8. Upon information and belief, the subject property maintains significant equity being located in Clinton Hills, Brooklyn, it is valued at approximately $1.6 million dollars with an outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $600,000.00 there is almost 1 million dollars of equity in the subject premises. 9. This is the second Order to Show Cause filed by the plaintiff in this Foreclosure part, the first seeking to vacate the default judgment was denied presumably because of the fact that the defendant Farnsworth did not appear in the Note. 10. However there was an additional order to show cause filed which was returnable on July 25, 2019 in the partition action seeking to stay this foreclosure action wherein interim emergency application for relief was granted and afforded the defendant Farnsworth the ability to settle the partition action and since that was the only relief sought in the instant order to show cause it was withdrawn on the return date. 11. Hence, the necessity of the instant order to show cause which seeks only to facilitate the ability to complete the sale of the subject premises which will afford the defendant Farnsworth the ability to pay off the mortgage and satisfy the debt pursuant to the agreemeñt owed to the defendant McKenzie. 12. The bank will not be prejudiced by the granting of this stay given the fact that they are aware of the partition action and the significant equity held by plaintiff in the subject property. FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/10/2023 12:13 PM INDEX NO. 506027/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 329 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2023 Wherefore, I respectfully request that the court grants me the relief set forth herein in its entirety together with such other and further relief as this court may deem just and proper Dated: October 28 , 2019 Brooklyn, New York K in H. Spikes, Esq. FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/10/2023 12:13 PM INDEX NO. 506027/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 329 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KING X SHERREL FARNSWORTH INDEX NO. 506027/2014 AFFIDAVIT PLAINTIFF, -Against- PETER MCKENZIE and J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK DEFENDANTS. X Sherrell Farnsworth, being duly sworn deposes and says under penalty of perjury as follows: 1. I submit this affidavit in support of the defendant's Sherrel Farnsworth's Order to Show Cause seeking to stay the instant foreclosure action and staying the imminent auction of the subject property currently scheduled for October 31, 2019. Plaintiff seeks this relief on grounds pursuant to CPLR 2201 2. I have discovered, by reviewing the notice of sale on the NYS Court's website that the property is scheduled for sale on October 31, 2019. The property is in a prime location here in Brooklyn. The foreclosure action was commenced on July 1, 2014 and a Judgment of Foreclosure was entered against defendants on March 28, 2018. Exhibits A. 3. I never received the notice of sale, but obtained the information from a third party. 4. Upon information and belief, the requested relief is appropriately sought before this court because while I owned 99% interest in the subject property is was named on the mortgage, my name did not appear on the note and co-defendant Peter McKenzie, the individual who is named on the Note, Mortgage and Deed (on Deed, as a 1% stakeholder interest, only) has agreed FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/10/2023 12:13 PM INDEX NO. 506027/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 329 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2023 stipulation of settlement in the action entitled SHERREL FARNSWORTH -against- PETER by MCKENZIE, JP MORGAN CHASEBANK, SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST BY PURCHASE FROM FDIC, Index No. 3346/2015 to accept the sum of $120,000.00 to settle his right of interest in the property and finally allowing me to sell the subject premises to satisfy this claim pursuant to our agreement spread out on the record on the trial date, at which I was present. 5. Prior to the aforementioned agreement, I was stymied from disposing with this foreclosure because the defendant McKenzie would not agree to either accept a reasonable pay off, agree to sell the subject premises or seek modification of the loan. 6. I purchased the subject property in the year 2000 and invested a substantial amount of money in purchase and renovations to the property. Defendant Mckenzie was not part of the initial purchase of the property. Defendant McKenzie was only on the property because he assisted plaintiff in the refinance of her first loan in 2001. The defendant Bank required the plaintiff to give McKenzie, a one percent interest in the subject premises to secure the mortgage note as a matter of course. As such, McKenzie was given one percent interest in the property, while plaintiff retained 99 percent interest in the property. Exhibit B. 8. The subject property maintains significant equity being located in Clinton Hills, Brooklyn, it is valued at approximately $1.6 million dollars with an outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $600,000.00 there is almost 1 million dollars of equity in the subject premises. 9. I have procured a purchaser for the subject premises for the sum of $1,242,000.00 with an expected closing date within 60 days and have received a down payment in the amount of $42,000.00 Exhibit D - copy of contract and check. 10. Hence, the necessity of the instant order to show cause which seeks only to facilitate the ability to complete the sale of the subject premises which will afford me the ability to pay off the FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/10/2023 12:13 PM INDEX NO. 506027/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 329 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2023 plaintiff's mortgage and satisfy the debt pursuant to the agreement owed to the defendant McKenzie. 11. The bank will not be prejudiced by the granting of this stay given the fact that there is significant equity held by defendant Farnsworth in the subject property. I seek to stay the foreclosure action so that the sale of the property can be completed and all parties can be made whole. In short the only manner in which an equitable disposition of this matter could occur is by allowing the subject property to be sold and stopping the sale. 5EeTrell Farnsworth Sworn to before me this a of October 2 19 Notary blic FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/10/2023 12:13 PM INDEX NO. 506027/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 329 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2023 Index No 506027/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KING X PETER MCKENZIE, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST BY PURCHASE FROM FDIC, Plaintiff, -against- PETER MCKENZIE, SHERREL FARNSWORTH et al Defendants. X ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, AFFIRMATION AND AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT Rule 130.1.1(a) Kevin Spikes Thomas & Spikes, Esqs. Attorneys for Defendant 2nd 111 Court Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201 (718) 852-1899 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/10/2023 12:13 PM INDEX NO. 506027/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 329 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KING X SHERREL FARNSWORTH INDEX NO. 506027/2014 AFFIRMATION PLAINTIFF, -Against- PETER MCKENZIE and J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK DEFENDANTS. X KEVIN H. SPIKES, being duly sworn deposes and says under penalty of perjury as follows: On October 28, 2019 at approximately at 2 p.m I contacted Fein, Such and Crane -and spoke to Costello in the litigation Department by phone and informed him that I will filing the instant Order to Show Cause on October 29, 2019 at 2:30 pm at the Kings County Supreme Court, 360 Adams Street, Brooklyn, New York in the Ex-parte motion part and that I would be seeking a Emergency Stay of the an auction sale scheduled for October 31, 2019. On the same day, I also spoke to defendant Peter Mckenzie at approximately 3:00p.m and advised him of the above. I am unsure as were they whether they would be appearing on this date. K m H. Spi Dated: October 28, 2019 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/10/2023 12:13 PM INDEX NO. 506027/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 329 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2023 Index No 506027/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KING X PETER MCKENZIE, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST BY PURCHASE FROM FDIC, Plaintiff, -against- PETER MCKENZIE, SHERREL FARNSWORTH et al Defendants. X ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, AFFIRMATION AND AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT Rule 130.1.1(a) Kevi Spikes Thomas & Spikes, Esqs. Attorneys for Defendant 2"' 111 Court Street, fl Brooklyn, NY 11201 (718) 852-1899 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/10/2023 10/29/2019 12:13 02:31 PM INDEX NO. 506027/2014 INDEX NO. 506027/2014 [ffLED: NYSCEF DOC.KINGS---COUNTY NO. 329187 CLERK 04/20/2018 09:05 AM) RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/29/2019 03/10/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 143 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/20/2018 At IAS Part of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, beld in and for the County of KINGS at the Courthouse, at Civic % Ce er, BROOKLYN, New York, on the day of Oh . 201% PRESENT: HON. NOACH DEAR JUSTICE PRESIDING JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, SUCCESSOR fN INTEREST BY PURCHASE FROM THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSUR.ANCE CORPORATION AS RECEIVER OF WASHINGTON MUTUAI BANK F/K/A WASHINGTON M.UTUAL BANK, FA., SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO NORTH AMERICAN MORTGAGE COMPANY Plaintiff, JUDGMENT OF -vs- FORECLOSURF & SALE Foreclosure of: 240 GRFENE AVENUE BROOKLYN, NY 11238 PETER K. MCKENZlE; SHERREL FARNSWORTH A/K/A SHERREL A. FARNSWORTH; JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; RAB PERFORMANCE RECOVERIES, Ll-C; AMERICAN EXPRESS RANK FSB, CAPffAL ONE BANK; CITY OF NEW YORK TRANSIT ADJUDICATION BUREAU; NEW YORK Cl fY ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD; NYC DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE-PARKfNG VIOLATR)NS BUREAU; WILLIAM DOE; AND DANIELLE MOORE, Index No.: Defendants. 506027/2014 Block: 1966 I ot: 18 On the Summons, Verified Complaint and Notice of Pendency of Action duly filed in this action on Jtdy 1, 2014, the Order of Reference dated June 19. 2016 and all proceedings thereon: and on the reading and filing of the Affirmation of FE1N. SUCH & CRANFL Li P, Kristin M. Mykulak Esq., of counsel for PlaintifT, dated April 21, 2016, showing that cach of the defendants herein have been du!y served with the Summons and Complaint in this action, or