On April 30, 2021 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Rios Jason,
Rios Tanya,
and
Lake Havasu Houseboats Llc,
Lake Havasu Houseboats Llc A California Limited Liability Company,
Meyer Erin,
Meyer Gary,
for Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
\
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 10/25/2021 12:49 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Panganiban,Deputy Clerk
CM-110
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY
Neil S. Lerner, SBN 134031, Edward A. CosQrove, SBN 251621
Cox Wootton Lerner Griffin & Hansen, LLP
12011 San Vicente Boulevard, Suite 600, Los Angeles, CA 9 0049
TELEPHONE NO.: 310-440-0020 FAX NO. (Optional): 440-0015
E-MAIL ADDREss 1optiona1J: nsl@cwlfirm.com, ecosgrove@cwlfirm.com
ATTORNEY FOR /NameJ: Defs, Lake Havasu Houseboats, Gary Meyer, Erin Meyer
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
STREET ADDREss: 111 North Hill Street
MAILING ADDRESS:
c1TY AND z1P coDE: Los Angeles, CA 90012
BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk Courthouse
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Jason Rios, et al.
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Lake Havasu Houseboats, LLC, etc., et al.
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
{Check one): m UNLIMITED CASE
(Amount demanded
D LIMITED CASE
(Amount demanded is $25,000
21STCV16328
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: November 9, 2021 Time: 9:00 a.m. Dept.: 16 Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
[Z] Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Edward A. Cosgrove
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
1. Party or parties (answer one):
a. W This statement is submitted by party (name): Defendants, Lake Havasu Houseboats, Gary Meyer, Erin Meyer
b. D This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date):
b. D The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. D All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. D The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
( 1) D have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) D have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) D have had a default entered against them (specify names):
c. D The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
4. Description of case
a. Type of case in W complaint D cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
Personal Injury/Negligence; Breach of Contract; Promissory Fraud; Intentional & Negligent Misrepresentation
Violation of Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code sections 17200 et seq. & 17500 et seq.
Pa e1of5
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use
Judicial Council of California
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Court,
rules 3.720-3.730
CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] www.oourts.ca.gov
Document Filed Date
October 25, 2021
Case Filing Date
April 30, 2021
Category
Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.