Motion-Secondary: SONNY BENUDIZ VS WILLIAM A. SOROKY

• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 09/26/2022 05:04 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by A. Lopez,Deputy Clerk

        JOSEPH S. FISCHBACH (SBN 70830)
  1     jsf2@fischbachlaw.com
        Fischbach & Fischbach, ALC.
  2     8665 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 400F
        Beverly Hills, California 90211
  3
        Telephone: (310) 278-4015
  4     Telecopier: (310) 278- 2894

  5     Law Offices of J.T. Fox & Associates, APC (Associated Counsel)
        J.T Foxjt@jtfoxlaw.com
  6
        556 S. Fair Oaks Ave., No. 444
  7     Pasadena, California 91105
        Telephone: (888) 750-5530
  8     Telecopier: (888) 750-5530
  9     Attorneys for Plaintiff,
        SONNY BENUDIZ
10

11

12

13
                                              SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
14
                             FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – CENTRAL JUDICIAL DISTRICT
15

16
                                                                                                 )   Case No. 21STCV29661
         SONNY BENUDIZ, an individual                                                            )
17                                                                                               )
                                                                                                 )   [Assigned for all purposes to Dept. 51, the
                               Plaintiff,
18                                                                                               )   Hon. Upinder. S. Kalra, judge presiding]
                   vs.                                                                           )
19                                                                                               )
                                                                                                 )   PLAINTIFF’S REPLY TO DEFENDANT’S
20                                                                                               )   OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
                                                                                                 )
         WILLIAM A. SOROKY, an individual; AND DOES                                              )   FILE PROPOSED THIRD AMENDED
21
         1 TO 10, INCLUSIVE,                                                                     )   COMPLAINT; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS
22                                                                                               )   AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT THEREOF
                               Defendants.                                                       )
                                                                                                 )
23                                                                                                   RESERVATION ID:                    541833143354
                                                                                                 )
                                                                                                 )   DATE:                              OCTOBER 3, 2022
24                                                                                               )   TIME:                              9:00 A.M.
                                                                                                 )   DEPT.:                             5
25                                                                                               )
                                                                                                 )
26                                                                                               )
                                                                                                 )
27                                                                                                   1

28                                PLAINTIFF’S REPLY TO DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND