arrow left
arrow right
  • SONNY BENUDIZ VS WILLIAM A. SOROKY Fraud (no contract) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • SONNY BENUDIZ VS WILLIAM A. SOROKY Fraud (no contract) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 11/14/2022 05:35 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by D. Jones,Deputy Clerk 1 RONALD P. SLATES, State Bar #43712 KEVIN A. HOANG, State Bar #277132 2 RONALD P. SLATES, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 500 South Grand Avenue, Biltmore Tower Suite 2010 3 Los Angeles, California 90071 (213) 624-1515 / FAX (213) 624-7536 4 rslates2@rslateslaw.com 5 Attorneys for Defendant William A. Soroky 6 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL DISTRICT - STANLEY MOSK COURTHOUSE 10 11 SONNY BENUDIZ, ) CASE NO. 21STCV29661 ) 12 Plaintiff, ) Assigned for all purposes to the Hon. Upinder ) S. Kalra, Judge - Dept 51 13 vs. ) ) DEFENDANT’S SEPARATE STATEMENT 14 SOROKY A. WILLIAM AND DOES 1 TO 10, ) OF UNDISPUTED AND DISPUTED FACTS INCLUSIVE, ) IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S 15 ) MOTION FOR SUMMARY Defendant. ) ADJUDICATION ON THE THIRD CAUSE 16 ) OF ACTION FOR BREACH OF ) FIDUCIARY DUTY 17 ) ) Date: November 28, 2022 18 ) Time: 9:00 a.m. ) Dept.: 51 19 ) ) [Filed concurrently with Memorandum of Points 20 ) and Authorities; Decl. of Yosef Cohen, William ) A. Soroky, Kevin A. Hoang; Evidentiary 21 ) Objections] 22 23 Defendant William A. Soroky (“Soroky”) hereby submits the following Separate 24 Statement of Undisputed and Disputed Material Facts with references to supporting evidence, 25 pursuant to California Civil Procedure Code Section 437c(b), and in compliance with California 26 Rules of Court, Rule 3.1350(e), in opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Adjudication. 27 /// 28 Page 1 DEFENDANT'S SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED AND DISPUTED FACTS IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION ON THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION