arrow left
arrow right
  • CLAUDIA APOLINAR, ET AL. VS POLYMER80, INC., A NEVADA CORPORATION Other Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • CLAUDIA APOLINAR, ET AL. VS POLYMER80, INC., A NEVADA CORPORATION Other Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

CM-015 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Richard H. Schoenberger/Spencer J. Pahlke/Sara M. Peters 122190/250914/260610 Walkup, Melodia, Kelly & Schoenberger 650 California Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108 TELEPHONE NO.: 415-981-7210 FAX NO.(Optional): 415-391-6965 E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): rschoenberger@walkuplawoffice.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plaintiffs Claudia Apolinar and Emmanuel Perez-Perez SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los Angeles STREET ADDRESS: 111 North Hill Street MAILING ADDRESS: Los Angeles, CA 90012 CITY AND ZIP CODE: BRANCH NAME:Stanley Mosk Courthouse PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Claudia Apolinar and Emmanuel Perez-Perez CASE NUMBER: 21STCV29196 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:Polymer80, Inc., et al. JUDICIAL OFFICER: Daniel M. Crowley DEPT.: NOTICE OF RELATED CASE 28 Identify, in chronological order according to date of filing, all cases related to the case referenced above. 1. a. Title: People of the State of California v. Polymer80, Inc. et al. b. Case number: 21STCV06257 c. Court:  X same as above  other state or federal court (name and address): Electronically Received 08/11/2021 08:03 AM d. Department: 32 e. Case type:  limited civil  X unlimited civil  probate family law  other (specify): f. Filing date: February 17, 2021 g. Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?"  Yes  X No h. Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check all that apply):  involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims.  X arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact.  involves claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to the same property. X is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources if heard by different judges.   Additional explanation is attached in attachment 1h i. Status of case:  X pending  dismissed  with  without prejudice  disposed of by judgment 2. a. Title: b. Case number: c. Court:  same as above  other state or federal court (name and address): d. Department: Page 1 of 3 Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California NOTICE OF RELATED CASE Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.300 www.courtinfo.ca.gov CM-015 [Rev. July 1, 2007] Apolinar/Perez