On March 04, 2021 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Bullard Stephen,
Coleman Earl,
Torres Edward,
People Of The State Of California,
and
One Hundred Ninety Thousand Three Hundred Thirty-Five Dollars $190 335.00 In U.S. Currency,
for Asset Forfeiture Case (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): | ° FOR COURT USE ONLY
Grace Pak, Deputy District Attorney, 188016
211 West Temple Street, 11th floor 4
Los Angeles, CA:90012 FILED
rBLEPHONENO: (213) 257-2100 FAxNO. Optoneh: (213) chan Stpsintyat Los Angaios
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Opticnay: Gpak@da.lacounty.gov 04 /30 202 1
ATTORNEY FOR (Nemer Petitioner:
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los Angeles
street aopress: 111 North Hill Street
MAILING ADDRESS: *
GIy AND ZIP CODE: | og Angeles, CA 90012
BRANGH NAME: Stanley Mosk
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: The People of the State of California
DEFENDANT/RESPONOENT: $190,335.00 in U.S. Currency
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT GASE NUMBER:
(Check one): [Z) UNLIMITED CASE [ umirep case | 21STCPO0699
{Amount demanded (Amount cemandéd Is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) orless) ©
eri R Carter, Executive Cenk af Court
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Is scheduled as follows: !
Date: May 17, 2021 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept. 151
Address of court (if different from the address above): \
Notice of Intent te Appear by Telephone, by (name): Grace Pak for Petitioner, Pamela Tedeschi for Claimant
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
1. Party or partles (answer one):
a. (_] This statement is submitted by party (name):
b. [7] This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): People of St. of CA (Petitioner), Ear! Coleman (Claimant)
|
2. Complaint and cross-complaint (fo be answered by plaintiffs and crogs-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date): .
b. [2] The:cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): |
“3, Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
o [CE] The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complpint
(1) [1 have not been served (specify names and expidin why not):
(2) [77] have been served but have not appeared and hive not been dismissed (specify names):
be (3) i (1 have had a default entered against them (pocly names):
~ ¢« The following additional parties may be added (specify namés, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
no they, may be served):
4. Description of case
a. Type of case in
complaint (1) cross-complaint | (Describe, including causes of action):
Asset Foriciture - in Rem Proceeding
: !
Farm Adopted ox Mandatory Ueo CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
CM-110 {Rev. July 1, 2011)
Document Filed Date
April 30, 2021
Case Filing Date
March 04, 2021
Category
Asset Forfeiture Case (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Court-Ordered Dismissal - Other (Other) 10/03/2022
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.