arrow left
arrow right
  • PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA VS ONE HUNDRED NINETY THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS ($190,335.00) IN U.S. CURRENCY Asset Forfeiture Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA VS ONE HUNDRED NINETY THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS ($190,335.00) IN U.S. CURRENCY Asset Forfeiture Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

B22 9727 z z ony Dw & wWN Electronically Received 09/26/2022 10:39 AM = oO N GEORGE GASCON LED istrict Attorney FI GRACE PAK, State Bar No. 188016 Superior Court of California Deputy District Attorney oe es County of Los Angeles Asset Forfeiture Section — Major Narcotics Division 211 W. Temple Street, Suite 1100 OCT 03 2022 Los Angeles, California 90012 " , (213) 257-2100 Sheers K. Curie, éxecusive OificeriClerk of Court Shuck Rape, , Deputy Attorney for Petitioner Michelle R. Zarate Government Code section 6103 (No Fee) SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,) Case No.:. 21STCP00699 [Assigned to the Hon. Richard L. Fruin, Petitioner, Department 15] Vv. ONE HUNDRED NINETY THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED THIRTY-FIVE [PROPOSED] STIPULATED JUDGMENT AND ORDER FOR DISTRIBUTION OF DOLLARS ($190,335.00) SEIZED PROPERTY IN U.S. CURRENCY. : DEPT. 15 Respondent. Earl Coleman, Claimant. ) The parties hereto having so stipulated and agreed as reflected in the executed Stipulation for Judgment, and good cause therefore appearing, the court orders, adjudges, decrees and finds as follows: , 1. This is an action to forfeit seized property under the authority of 11470 et al. of the Health and Safety Code. -1- [EESSEESED] STIPULATED JUDGMENT AND ORDER FOR DISTRIBUTION OF SEIZED PROPERTY 21STCP00699