Complaint - MICHELLE SAMPSON VS ALBERTO CARVALHO, ET AL.

Download Document Print Document

On June 24, 2022 a wrongful termination (general jurisdiction) case was filed by Sampson Michelle, against Carvalho Alberto, and Lausd, represented by Hill Charlie L., in the jurisdiction of Los Angeles County. Judge Michael P. Vicencia presiding.

                        
						    Preview
                        
                        
                          COMPLAINT
MICHELLE SAMPSON FILED
2692 ADRIATIC AVE Superior cout of California
ount’ 5 e:
LONG BEACH, CA 90810 EE aes
562-235-4590 JUN 24 2929
MICHELLES220@YAHOO.COM Sher R Cre fCerk ot Con
PLAINTIFF, IN PROPER PERSON *—__® SS ey
LOS ANGELES JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 22 ac
Cy
MICHELLE SAMPSON, PLANTIFF CASE NO: LBCVvO02°9
vs. peptno;_(_1\)\\
H* \owas C A

Austin Beutner, DEFENDANT’ \ VA \no LAU SIN
C/O LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT .
333 South Beaudry Ave. Los Angeles, CA 90017-1466

COMPLAINT

PLAINTIFF, MICHELLE SAMPSON, IN PROPER PERSON COMPAINS AGAINST DADA orm
“BEUTNVER, AS FOLLOWS: wre Cawalg

I PARTIES

1. MICHELLE SAMPSON, “PLAINTIFF”

AUSTIN-BEUTNER, “DFENDANT”
eS Voge Caivylo mm EACTS

3. PLAINTIFF WAS OFFERED MANY POSITIONS AFTER PAYING TO TEST AND INTERVIEWING
WITH MANY SCHOOLS.

4. CONVICTION AND EXPUNGEMENT INFORMATION WAS INCLUDED ON APPLICTION.

5. EMPLOYMENT WAS RESCINED AFTER FINGERPRINTING REVEALED ALREADY DISCLOSED
CONVICTIONS AND…