On September 13, 2022 a
Answer
was filed
involving a dispute between
Canizalez Ventura Jose I.,
Rivera Fatima Mayda,
and
Ford Motor Company,
for Product Liability ? Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act¿(Lemon Law) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 10/19/2022 12:52 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by A. Lopez,Deputy Clerk
1 GATES, GONTER, GUY, PROUDFOOT & MUENCH, LLP
38 Discovery, Suite 200
2 Irvine, California 92618
Telephone: (949) 753-0255
3 Facsimile: (949) 753-0265
Electronic Service: eservice@g3pmlaw.com
4
Attorney: MATTHEW M. PROUDFOOT, SBN: 155988
5
Attorney for Defendants FORD MOTOR COMPANY
6
7
8 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA – COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CENTRAL DISTRICT
9 UNLIMITED JURISDICTION
10
11 JOSE I. CANIZALEZ VENTURA and ) Case No: 22STCV29825
FATIMA MAYDA RIVERA, ) Judge: Gregory Keosian
12 ) Dept. 61
Plaintiffs, )
13 vs. )
) FORD MOTOR COMPANY’S ANSWER TO
14 FORD MOTOR COMPANY; and DOES 1 ) COMPLAINT
through 10, inclusive, )
15 )
Defendants. )
16 ) Complaint Filed: September 13, 2022
) Trial Date:
17
18 Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY (“Defendant”) hereby respond to the
19 Complaint (“Complaint”) filed by Plaintiffs JOSE I. CANIZALEZ VENTURA
20 and FATIMA MAYDA RIVERA (“Plaintiffs”) as follows:
21 Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 431.30,
22 Defendant hereby generally denies each and every allegation in the
23 Complaint and further denies that Plaintiffs has been damaged in any
24 sum whatsoever.
25 FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
26 (Disclaimer of Warranties)
27 Plaintiffs’ cause of action for breach of express warranty and
28 incidental and consequential damages is barred by the express
1
___________________________________________________________________________________
FORD MOTOR COMPANY’S ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
Document Filed Date
October 19, 2022
Case Filing Date
September 13, 2022
Category
Product Liability ? Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act¿(Lemon Law) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 10/19/2022 12:52 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by A. Lopez,Deputy Clerk 1 GATES, GONTER, GUY, PROUDFOOT & MUENCH, LLP 38 Discovery, Suite 200 2 Irvine, California 92618 Telephone: (949) 753-0255 3 Facsimile: (949) 753-0265 Electronic Service: eservice@g3pmlaw.com 4 Attorney: MATTHEW M. PROUDFOOT, SBN: 155988 5 Attorney for Defendants FORD MOTOR COMPANY 6 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA – COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL DISTRICT 9 UNLIMITED JURISDICTION 10 11 JOSE I. CANIZALEZ VENTURA and ) Case No: 22STCV29825 FATIMA MAYDA RIVERA, ) Judge: Gregory Keosian 12 ) Dept. 61 Plaintiffs, ) 13 vs. ) ) FORD MOTOR COMPANY’S ANSWER TO 14 FORD MOTOR COMPANY; and DOES 1 ) COMPLAINT through 10, inclusive, ) 15 ) Defendants. ) 16 ) Complaint Filed: September 13, 2022 ) Trial Date: 17 18 Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY (“Defendant”) hereby respond to the 19 Complaint (“Complaint”) filed by Plaintiffs JOSE I. CANIZALEZ VENTURA 20 and FATIMA MAYDA RIVERA (“Plaintiffs”) as follows: 21 Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 431.30, 22 Defendant hereby generally denies each and every allegation in the 23 Complaint and further denies that Plaintiffs has been damaged in any 24 sum whatsoever. 25 FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE 26 (Disclaimer of Warranties) 27 Plaintiffs’ cause of action for breach of express warranty and 28 incidental and consequential damages is barred by the express 1 ___________________________________________________________________________________ FORD MOTOR COMPANY’S ANSWER TO COMPLAINT