Party Statement: ANTHONY JACKSON MANNING, ET AL. VS PAMA V PROPERTIES LP, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 02/27/2023 11:39 AM David W. Slayton, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by S. Bolden,Deputy Clerk



                                                                                                                                                                          CM-110
            ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address):                                                         FOR COURT USE ONLY
                 Christofer R. Chapman                                                                      153186
                 FRIEDMAN & CHAPMAN, LLP
                 1342 Coronado Ave.
                 Long Beach                                                           CA 90804
                         TELEPHONE NO.: 562-888-4151                                    562-436-9415
                                                                       FAX NO. (Optional):

                E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): chris@fc-lawfirm.com

                   ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plaintiffs

             SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los                       Angeles
                 STREET ADDRESS:   111 N. Hill Street
                 MAILING ADDRESS: Same

                CITY AND ZIP CODE: Los Angeles                                          CA        90012
                    BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk


                  PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: ANTHONY                JACKSON MANNING, et al.
           DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: PAMA                   V PROPERTIES LP

                                             CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT                                                        CASE NUMBER:

           (Check one):            Dx        UNLIMITED CASE                D        LIMITED CASE                                               22STCV38842
                                             (Amount demanded                       (Amount demanded is $25,000
                                             exceeds $25,000)                       or less)

            A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
           Date: March 13, 2023                              Time: 8:30 a.m.                 Dept.: 32                     Div.:                          Room:
           Address of court (if different from the address above):


            DX         Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name):

                             INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
           1.     Party or parties (answer one):
                  a.    Dx      This statement is submitted by party (name): Plaintiffs
                  b.    D       This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):



           2.     Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
                  a. The complaint was filed on (date): 12/14/2022
                  b.    D   The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):

           3.     Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
                  a.    D    All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
                  b.    DX       The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
                                 (1)    D     have not been served (specify names and explain why not):

                                 (2)    DX      have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): Defendant's
                                                response pleading is due on 03/06/2023.
                                 (3)    D       have had a default entered against them (specify names):

                  c.    D        The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
                                 they may be served):


           4.     Description of case
                  a. Type of case in          Dx      complaint          D         cross-complaint           (Describe, including causes of action):
                         This is breach of the warranty of habitability case with causes of action: breach of statutory warranty of habitability, breach
                         of covenant of quiet enjoyment, negligence, violation of civil code 1942.4, unlawful entry
                                                                                                                                                                            Page 1 of 5
          Form Adopted for Mandatory Use
            Judicial Council of California
             CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011]
                                                                   CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
                                                                                                                                           CfB
                                                                                                                                        www.ceb.com
                                                                                                                                                                     Cal. Rules of Court,
                                                                                                                                                                      rules 3.720–3.730
                                                                                                                                                                     www.courts.ca.gov