arrow left
arrow right
  • U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION VS RUDY ESPINOZA Collections Case - Seller Plaintiff (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION VS RUDY ESPINOZA Collections Case - Seller Plaintiff (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 02/24/2023 06:16 PM David W. Slayton, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by E. Chanes,Deputy Clerk DocuSign Envelope ID: 793B2982-C432-4F54-B13C-9316B5F79D00 FOR COURT USE ONLY ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address) Amanda Riggs, SBN 285764 Levy & Associates, LLC 1000 Cliff Mine Rd. Suite #330 Pittsburgh, PA 15275 TELEPHONE: (888) 277-9071 ATTORNEY FOR: U.S. Bank National Association SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los Angeles STREET ADDRESS: 12720 Norwalk Blvd. MAILING ADDRESS: Same CITY AND ZIP CODE: Whittier CA 90650 BRANCH NAME: Norwalk PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: U.S. Bank National Association DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: RUDY ESPINOZA CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one): [X] UNLIMITED CASE [ ]LIMITED CASE 22NWCV01387 (Amount demanded exceeds $25,000) (Amount demanded is $25,000 or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: 2023-04-12 Time: 1:30PM Dept.: F Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): [ ] Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by(name): INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties: a. [ x ] This statement is submitted by party: U.S. Bank National Association, Plaintiff b. [ ] This statement is submitted jointly by parties: 2. Complaint and cross-complaint a. The complaint was filed on: December 14, 2022 b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on: 3. Service a. [ ] All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) [ x ] have not been served:RUDY ESPINOZA – please see attached Affidavit of Nonservice (2) [ ] have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed: {parties that have been served} (3) [ ] have had a default entered against them: c. [ ] The following additional parties may be added: 4. Description of case a. Type of case in [ x ] complaint [ ] cross-complaint: Collections – Common Counts and Breach of Contract. Page 1 of 5 CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court, Judicial Council of California Rules 3.720-3.730 CM-110 [Rev, July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov