Motion-Secondary: Jeffrey F. Ryan vs. William Carlos Leet, et al

• 
• 
• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                WILLIAM A. LAPCEVIC (SBN 238893)
 1   DIBENEDETTO LAPCEVIC & DRAA, LLP
 2   1101 Pacific Avenue, Suite 320
     Santa Cruz, California 95060
 3   Tel.: (831) 325-2674
     Fax: (831) 477-7617
 4   Email: wal@dld-law.com
 5   Attorneys for Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant
     JEFFREY F. RYAN
 6

 7
                          SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
 8

 9                    COUNTY OF SAN MATEO — UNLIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION

10
       JEFFREY F. RYAN                              Case No. 21-CIV-04391
11
                              Plaintiff,            [PROPOSED ORDER] GRANTING
12                                                  CROSS-DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
13                  vs.                             SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR, IN THE
                                                    ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY
14     WILLIAM CARLOS LEET, et al.,                 ADJUDICATION

15                            Defendants.
                                                    Date: June 13, 2023
16                                                  Time: 2:00 PM
17     WILLIAM CARLOS LEET,                         Dept: 4

18                             Cross-Complainant,
19                  vs.
20
       JEFFREY F. RYAN, et al.,
21
                              Cross-Defendants.
22

23

24

25

26

27
     RECITALS
28
     {00183931;1}                          1
          [PROPOSED ORDER] GRANTING CROSS- DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
                JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION
 1            On June 13, 2023, at 2:00 p.m., in Department 4 of the above-captioned Court, located at

 2   400 County Center Road, Redwood City, California, Cross Defendant Jeffrey F. Ryan (“Cross-

 3   Defendant”)’s Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication to

 4   Cross-Complainant William Carlos Leet (“Cross-Complainant”)’s Cross Complaint was duly

 5   called and heard by the Honorable Nancy L. Fineman, William A. Lapcevic of the Law Offices

 6   of DIBENEDETTO LAPCEVIC & DRAA, LLP appeared on behalf of the moving party (Cross-

 7   Defendant) and Cross-Complainant appeared in pro-per.

 8            Upon considering the papers filed in support and in opposition to the motion, and

 9   considering argument of counsel, the Court rules as follows:

10   ORDER

11            There is no triable issue of material fact and Cross-Defendant is entitled to judgment as

12   a matter of law as to the following causes of action:

13            (1) Fraudulent Misrepresentation;

14            (2) Fraudulent Concealment;

15            (3) Promissory Estoppel; and

16            (4) Unfair Business Practices.

17            Cross-Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in its entirety.

18

19   IT IS SO ORDERED,

20
21   Dated: ___________________                    ________________________________
                                                   JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
22

23

24

25

26

27

28
     {00183931;1}                          2
          [PROPOSED ORDER] GRANTING CROSS- DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
                JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION