arrow left
arrow right
  • IN RE LYFT RIDESHARE CASES COORDINATION document preview
  • IN RE LYFT RIDESHARE CASES COORDINATION document preview
  • IN RE LYFT RIDESHARE CASES COORDINATION document preview
  • IN RE LYFT RIDESHARE CASES COORDINATION document preview
  • IN RE LYFT RIDESHARE CASES COORDINATION document preview
  • IN RE LYFT RIDESHARE CASES COORDINATION document preview
  • IN RE LYFT RIDESHARE CASES COORDINATION document preview
  • IN RE LYFT RIDESHARE CASES COORDINATION document preview 
						
                                
Preview

                                1    William A. Levin, Esq. (SBN 98592)                                  ELECTRONICALLY
      Angela J. Nehmens, Esq. (SBN 309433)
 2    LEVIN SIMES ABRAMS LLP                                                  FILED
                                                                          Superior Court of California,
      1700 Montgomery Street, Suite 250                                    County of San Francisco
 3    San Francisco, California 94111
      Telephone: (415) 426-3000                                               02/10/2023
 4    Facsimile: (415) 426-3001                                            Clerk of the Court
                                                                             BY: JUDITH NUNEZ
      Email: wlevin@levinsimes.com                                                      Deputy Clerk
 5    Email: anehmens@levinsimes.com
                                                    Warren Metlitzky, Esq. (SBN 220758)
 6    Stephen J. Estey, Esq. (SBN 163093)           Gabriela Kipnis, Esq. (SBN 284965)
      R. Michael Bomberger, Esq. (SBN 169866)       CONRAD | METLITZKY | KANE LLP
 7                                                  Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1400
      Kristen K. Barton, Esq. (SBN 303228)          San Francisco, CA 94111
      ESTEY & BOMBERGER, LLP                        Telephone: (415) 343-7100
 8
      2869 India Street                             Facsimile: (415) 343-7101
 9    San Diego, CA 92103                           Email: wmetlitzky@conmetkane.com
      Telephone: (619) 295-0035                     Email: gkipnis@conmetkane.com
10    Facsimile: (619) 295-0172
                                                    Beth A. Stewart, Esq. (pro hac vice)
      Email: steve@estey-bomberger.com
11                                                  Heidi H. Hubbard, Esq. (pro hac vice)
      Email: mike@estey-bomberger.com               David Randall J. Riskin (pro hac vice)
      Email: kristen@estey-bomberger.com            WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
12
                                                    680 Maine Avenue, SW
13    Walt Cubberly, Esq. (SBN: 325163)             Washington, DC 20024
      WILLIAMS HART BOUNDAS                         Telephone: (202) 434-5000
14    EASTERBY, LLP                                 Facsimile: (202) 434-5029
      8441 Gulf Freeway, Suite 600                  Email: bstewart@wc.com
15    Houston, Texas 77017                          Email: hhubbard@wc.com
      Telephone: (713) 230-2200                     Email: driskin@wc.com
16    Facsimile: (713) 643-6226
      Email: wcubberly@whlaw.com                    Attorneys for Defendant Lyft, Inc.
17
      Attorneys for Plaintiffs
18

19                     SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
                               COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
20

21   Coordination Proceeding                            Judicial Council Coordinated Proceeding
     Special Title (Rule 3.550)                         (JCCP No. 5061)
22
     In Re: LYFT RIDESHARE CASES                        Case No. CJC-20-005061
23   This Document Relates to:
                                                        STIPULATION REGARDING ADDITION
24   Jane Doe DMA 1, et al. v. Lyft, Inc.,              OF CASES TO JCCP AND STAY OF
     Case No. CGC-22-603380 (San Francisco);            CASES
25
     Racquel Jones, et al. v. Lyft, Inc., et al.,
                                                        [Proposed] Order Filed Concurrently
26   Case No. CGC-22-601527(San Francisco);
27   Jessa Osburn, et al. v. Lyft, Inc., et al.
     Case No. CGC-22-601873 (San Francisco);
28
     Ethan Clark, at al. v. Lyft, Inc., et al.,
     Case No. CGC-22-603535 (San Francisco);
                                                    1
                STIPULATION REGARDING ADDITION OF CASES TO JCCP AND STAY OF CASES
 1
     Jane Doe EB 79 v. Lyft, Inc., et al.,
 2   Case No. CGC-22-603601 (San Francisco);

 3   Jane Doe WH 1592 v. Lyft, Inc., et al.,
     Case No. CGC-22-601950 (San Francisco);
 4

 5   Jane Doe WH 1500, et al. v. Lyft, Inc., et al.,
     Case No. CGC-22-602035 (San Francisco);
 6
     Jane Doe WH 1560, et al. v. Lyft, Inc., et al.,
 7   Case No. CGC-22-602404 (San Francisco)
 8   Jane Doe LSA 377, et al. v. Lyft, Inc. et al.,
 9   Case No. CGC-22-601459 (San Francisco)

10   Jane Doe LSA 397 v. Lyft, Inc. et al., Case
     No. CGC-22-601886 (San Francisco)
11
     Jane Doe CL 3 v. Lyft, Inc. et al., Case No.
12   CGC-22-602523 (San Francisco)
13
     Jane Doe CL 4-14 v. Lyft, Inc. et al., Case No.
14   CGC-22-603391 (San Francisco)

15   Jane Doe CL 15-20 v. Lyft, Inc. et al., Case
     No. CGC-23-604041 (San Francisco)
16

17   Jane Doe WH 1625, et al. v. Lyft, Inc., et al.,
     Case No. CGC-23-604475 (San Francisco)
18

19

20          WHEREAS, the Judicial Council has created a Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding

21   (“JCCP”) No. 5061;

22          WHEREAS, the following cases include similar allegations to the cases coordinated in

23   JCCP 5061:

24
                      Case Name                  Case No.          Court          Filing Date
25                                             CGC-22-603380   San Francisco   December 9, 2022
      1.   Jane Doe DMA 1, et al. v.
26         Lyft, Inc., et al.
                                               CGC-22-601527   San Francisco   August 31, 2022
      2.   Racquel Jones, et al. v. Lyft,
27         Inc., et al.
28                                             CGC-22-601873   San Francisco   September 19, 2022
      3.   Jessa Osburn, et al. v. Lyft,
           Inc., et al.
                                                       2
                STIPULATION REGARDING ADDITION OF CASES TO JCCP AND STAY OF CASES
 1
                       Case Name                  Case No.          Court           Filing Date
 2                                              CGC-22-603535   San Francisco    December 16, 2022
      4.     Ethan Clark, et al. v. Lyft,
 3           Inc., et al.
                                                CGC-22-603601   San Francisco    December 20, 2022
 4    5.     Jane Doe EB 79 v. Lyft, Inc.,
             et al.
 5           Jane Doe WH 1592 v. Lyft,          CGC-22-601950   San Francisco    September 26, 2022
      6.     Inc., et al.
 6           Jane Doe WH 1500, et al. v.        CGC-22-602035   San Francisco    September 29, 2022
      7.     Lyft, Inc., et al.
 7
             Jane Doe WH 1560, et al. v.        CGC-22-602404   San Francisco    October 13, 2022
      8.     Lyft, Inc., et al.
 8
             Jane Doe LSA 377, et al. v.        CGC-22-601459   San Francisco    August 29, 2022
 9    9.     Lyft, Inc. et al.
             Jane Doe LSA 397 v. Lyft, Inc.     CGC-22-601886   San Francisco    September 20, 2022
10    10.    et al.
11           Jane Doe CL 3 v. Lyft, Inc. et     CGC-22-602523   San Francisco    October 20, 2022
      11.    al.
12           Jane Doe CL 4-14 v. Lyft, Inc.     CGC-22-603391   San Francisco    December 9, 2022
      12.    et al.
13           Jane Doe CL 15-20 v. Lyft,         CGC-23-604041   San Francisco    January 17, 2023
      13.    Inc. et al.
14
             Jane Doe WH 1625, et al. v.        CGC-23-604475   San Francisco    February 6, 2023
      14.    Lyft, Inc., et al.
15

16            WHEREAS, the above-referenced cases have either been determined to be complex, been
17   designated as complex, and/or the Parties do not contest that they are complex within the meaning
18   of California Rule of Court (“CRC”) 3.400;
19            WHEREAS, the Parties agree that the above-referenced cases should be included in JCCP
20   5061;
21            WHEREAS, the Parties further agree that the above-referenced cases should be stayed in
22   their home jurisdictions pursuant to CRC 3.529(b) and 3.544(d); and
23            WHEREAS, the Parties agree that this stipulation does not affect the defenses Lyft, Inc.
24   has in or to the above-referenced cases.
25            NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AS FOLLOWS:
26            The above-referenced cases shall be designated as complex (insofar as necessary) and
27   included in JCCP 5061, and the cases shall be stayed in their home jurisdictions, and the Parties
28   submit concurrently herewith for entry by this Court a [Proposed] Order Regarding Addition of

                                                      3
                 STIPULATION REGARDING ADDITION OF CASES TO JCCP AND STAY OF CASES
 1   Cases to JCCP and Stay of Cases. This stipulation does not affect the defenses Lyft has in or to the

 2   above-referenced cases.

 3   IT IS SO STIPULATED.

 4                                                Respectfully submitted,

 5
     Dated: ____________
            2/9/2023                              By: _____________________________
 6                                                    William A. Levin
 7                                                    Angela J. Nehmens
                                                      LEVIN SIMES ABRAMS LLP
 8
     Dated: ____________
            2/9/2023                              By:______________________________
 9                                                   Brooks Cutter
                                                     Celine Cutter
10
                                                     CUTTER LAW PC
11
             2/9/2023
     Dated: ____________                          By: _____________________________
12                                                   Stephen J. Estey
                                                     R. Michael Bomberger
13                                                   Kristen K. Barton
                                                     ESTEY & BOMBERGER, LLP
14

15          2/9/2023
     Dated: ____________                          By: _____________________________
                                                     Walt Cubberly
16                                                   WILLIAMS HART BOUNDAS
                                                     EASTERBY, LLP
17
                                                      Attorneys for Plaintiffs
18

19           2/9/2023
     Dated: ____________                          By: _____________________________
                                                       Warren Metlitzky
20                                                     Gabriela Kipnis
                                                       CONRAD | METLITZKY | KANE LLP
21

22                                                        Heidi Hubbard
                                                          Beth Stewart
23                                                        David Randall J. Riskin
                                                          WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
24
                                                       Attorneys for Defendant Lyft, Inc.
25

26

27

28

                                                      4
                STIPULATION REGARDING ADDITION OF CASES TO JCCP AND STAY OF CASES