On August 10, 2016 a
Party Discovery
was filed
involving a dispute between
Bush, Lori,
Dignity Health, A Califonia Corporation,
and
Dignity Health, A Califonia Corporation,
St. Bernadine Medical Center A Business Entity Unknown,
Total Professional Network, Inc,
for Medical Malpractice Unlimited
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
P age 3 of 29 2017 10 31 22 11 06 GMT 18666446764 From Michael Libman
MIt HAEI J LIBMAN SBN 222353 O A
FC t
U C IOP C U Y
n
7H LAW OTFIC S OF MICH EL J L1BM AlV
ANB N
A
N I T T
IC
1R321 Ventura Boulevard Suite 70Q
Tarzana California 91356 o T o
Telephone 18 995 73 0
Facsiinile 866 644 67 i4
BY
trr
tftz filzr z rtiltr cr rrr PUTY
Pa1J 8 OQd
GARY I3EKKU IrTC I SBN I92731
6
A I RUFL YONAL C OI7 PORATION
i 49 Venl iara 13 ulevard Suite 220
Shec nai Oaks Cali fcsn ia 91403
Telephone 818 465 505
Facsunile 818 358 2829
y
Attornevs f r Plaintif Lt RI BL1SI I
io
tiUYERI 17 COURT OF T E STATE 0 C LIFCIRNIA
T
ld Ft R THE COUNTY UF SAN BE12 TA R DT it3 SAl BFRNARDIN DISTRTCT
i 3
LORI BUSH an individual CASE NO CIVDS 16l 3l 61
Plaintiff Ju ge Hon 7c hn M Pacheco
vs Dept 531
1V
PLAINTIFS I7 EPLY TO
ST QERNARDIN MEDICAL CENTER a D FENDANT S NON OPP4SITlQN TQ
btisiness entit fo 7n unlcno rn I EGN11 Y p 4IN IFF S MOT IOi T TO CO1V PEL
yg
H E 4LTF I a Califc rnia Corporatia i and FUKTHER ItESPONSES 7 O SPECIAL
7 DOES 1 tl rough 2U0 inclusive I1 TERRUGATOR ES S1 T TVb O
PItOPQU1VDE ON D EFENdJ ANT
Def ndants Di NITY HEt L I lt DECLAI ITTON OI
G
MICIIA L 3 LIBM N
DATE Novett ber 7 017
1
TiiVI 8 30 a xn
e j DEPT S31
E
J
5
6
7
j
l
1
PLr11NTiFF S 12EYLY TQ 1 d FE1VT 4NT S NO N OPPCUSITiOi TO PLAINTLFF S 1110T1t IV TO
GO vIPEL FURT iEft RESPONSES TO SPECIAL INTE 2ROCATORIES SET TW PROP tTND D N
UE EN1 AN 1 DIGNITY If AL rH
To Page 4 of 29 2017 10 31 22 11 06 GMT 18666446764 From Michael Libman
T THE UC tId T ll FEi iDANTS ND TF IR C UNS L OF RECC RD
1
L
I 1 II MC TIC N IS N T 1410 3T EFFECT ELY UNOPPI SED Ai v
T IE tE ORI S IOL LD I E G1t 414TEi UT R GJ iT
A D FEND 1V TS I r l C 1 1 I lti i I CI T 1 t v i51 R i t
ANI3 P V TIN
I7 lerdant s ac nissic t t that it served f utther resp nses stitl deficient as the are per 1
att heci Exhihit 1 is a cuncession tlzat Flaintifi s ITl tl01 ras nai anty a propriate l ut
n cessary lt took len thy motions tc be filed tor defe idarit ta sei e fitrtlzer responses not t
tnen ion respar to Plaint iffi s iultiple mcet dnd conf r attempts ta e1 de fense cc uy se l t
I the issu s of fhe
r spond tt and address its deficie t resp i ses and nvw m tic ns Uefendant
x
l rief appears to be d Iressing linc st entircl y other issucs earn lctcly unrelt teci t o ihe issu
tn Compel M1 C
1
xaised in Plain tiff s Motion videnrlv cief nd uit is undea the hopeful y
t g
r istak n belief that if t3 ey malce a lc t Uf noise abotrt ther issues on the 1ei1 the Court rill tnjs
1 the i ssues befo e if on the ri It Classic sheil ganle Uefend lt s brief vastzs everyonc s tirii
1
discus5ing oncerris about Flaintiff s responses tc other discovery L efendanf Ezas no defense t
the rnerits t f the MTG sc3 it chr se to attack Plaintiff s 1a yer pers nall r rebarc iu t nr late
1 issues
Firsl d f nd nt s oppositic is a disguis d rr c tiou about other unrelated C iseC v
responses of Pl intiff which even if the alleged deficiencies wcre true anc they are not i
Defense butted tc it
catuzot justify counsel s unr and unexpiained refusal meet antl eonfer
F laintiff s counsel abo rt the issue af dz endant s deficient responses as raisecl by PlaintiFf
caunse l Et en IF PlainCiil ar her eounsei ere rong whic i they we re nc t il dc es z ot justify ri
any c ray defense counse s refusal to mect her obli atic ns uric3er tl e law in arder to force a
z mation tc ean pe T o w r on s assurning atguendo tha t Plai lt i fi wa wrc n do not ac el up t a
rigl t for I efendan t d her c unsel to r fuse ta uieet and cc lfer rit all let alc ne iti go d faitl i
z
the discc vzry issues now subject of the hiTC in clear vic laLion of statutorilE pravided efi latiti
ts of abuse f discoverv
2
N l i TCE E MO 1 iCtN ANll R IUTIDN IQ CflMPEL Ft RT ER R SPUN ES I SFF CIAL
iPITERRt GAT RIES SET TWO ME1 0E FP fi DE L OF M CHAiL J LI 3MAN TC
Document Filed Date
October 31, 2017
Case Filing Date
August 10, 2016
Category
Medical Malpractice Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
P age 3 of 29 2017 10 31 22 11 06 GMT 18666446764 From Michael Libman MIt HAEI J LIBMAN SBN 222353 O A FC t U C IOP C U Y n 7H LAW OTFIC S OF MICH EL J L1BM AlV ANB N A N I T T IC 1R321 Ventura Boulevard Suite 70Q Tarzana California 91356 o T o Telephone 18 995 73 0 Facsiinile 866 644 67 i4 BY trr tftz filzr z rtiltr cr rrr PUTY Pa1J 8 OQd GARY I3EKKU IrTC I SBN I92731 6 A I RUFL YONAL C OI7 PORATION i 49 Venl iara 13 ulevard Suite 220 Shec nai Oaks Cali fcsn ia 91403 Telephone 818 465 505 Facsunile 818 358 2829 y Attornevs f r Plaintif Lt RI BL1SI I io tiUYERI 17 COURT OF T E STATE 0 C LIFCIRNIA T ld Ft R THE COUNTY UF SAN BE12 TA R DT it3 SAl BFRNARDIN DISTRTCT i 3 LORI BUSH an individual CASE NO CIVDS 16l 3l 61 Plaintiff Ju ge Hon 7c hn M Pacheco vs Dept 531 1V PLAINTIFS I7 EPLY TO ST QERNARDIN MEDICAL CENTER a D FENDANT S NON OPP4SITlQN TQ btisiness entit fo 7n unlcno rn I EGN11 Y p 4IN IFF S MOT IOi T TO CO1V PEL yg H E 4LTF I a Califc rnia Corporatia i and FUKTHER ItESPONSES 7 O SPECIAL 7 DOES 1 tl rough 2U0 inclusive I1 TERRUGATOR ES S1 T TVb O PItOPQU1VDE ON D EFENdJ ANT Def ndants Di NITY HEt L I lt DECLAI ITTON OI G MICIIA L 3 LIBM N DATE Novett ber 7 017 1 TiiVI 8 30 a xn e j DEPT S31 E J 5 6 7 j l 1 PLr11NTiFF S 12EYLY TQ 1 d FE1VT 4NT S NO N OPPCUSITiOi TO PLAINTLFF S 1110T1t IV TO GO vIPEL FURT iEft RESPONSES TO SPECIAL INTE 2ROCATORIES SET TW PROP tTND D N UE EN1 AN 1 DIGNITY If AL rH To Page 4 of 29 2017 10 31 22 11 06 GMT 18666446764 From Michael Libman T THE UC tId T ll FEi iDANTS ND TF IR C UNS L OF RECC RD 1 L I 1 II MC TIC N IS N T 1410 3T EFFECT ELY UNOPPI SED Ai v T IE tE ORI S IOL LD I E G1t 414TEi UT R GJ iT A D FEND 1V TS I r l C 1 1 I lti i I CI T 1 t v i51 R i t ANI3 P V TIN I7 lerdant s ac nissic t t that it served f utther resp nses stitl deficient as the are per 1 att heci Exhihit 1 is a cuncession tlzat Flaintifi s ITl tl01 ras nai anty a propriate l ut n cessary lt took len thy motions tc be filed tor defe idarit ta sei e fitrtlzer responses not t tnen ion respar to Plaint iffi s iultiple mcet dnd conf r attempts ta e1 de fense cc uy se l t I the issu s of fhe r spond tt and address its deficie t resp i ses and nvw m tic ns Uefendant x l rief appears to be d Iressing linc st entircl y other issucs earn lctcly unrelt teci t o ihe issu tn Compel M1 C 1 xaised in Plain tiff s Motion videnrlv cief nd uit is undea the hopeful y t g r istak n belief that if t3 ey malce a lc t Uf noise abotrt ther issues on the 1ei1 the Court rill tnjs 1 the i ssues befo e if on the ri It Classic sheil ganle Uefend lt s brief vastzs everyonc s tirii 1 discus5ing oncerris about Flaintiff s responses tc other discovery L efendanf Ezas no defense t the rnerits t f the MTG sc3 it chr se to attack Plaintiff s 1a yer pers nall r rebarc iu t nr late 1 issues Firsl d f nd nt s oppositic is a disguis d rr c tiou about other unrelated C iseC v responses of Pl intiff which even if the alleged deficiencies wcre true anc they are not i Defense butted tc it catuzot justify counsel s unr and unexpiained refusal meet antl eonfer F laintiff s counsel abo rt the issue af dz endant s deficient responses as raisecl by PlaintiFf caunse l Et en IF PlainCiil ar her eounsei ere rong whic i they we re nc t il dc es z ot justify ri any c ray defense counse s refusal to mect her obli atic ns uric3er tl e law in arder to force a z mation tc ean pe T o w r on s assurning atguendo tha t Plai lt i fi wa wrc n do not ac el up t a rigl t for I efendan t d her c unsel to r fuse ta uieet and cc lfer rit all let alc ne iti go d faitl i z the discc vzry issues now subject of the hiTC in clear vic laLion of statutorilE pravided efi latiti ts of abuse f discoverv 2 N l i TCE E MO 1 iCtN ANll R IUTIDN IQ CflMPEL Ft RT ER R SPUN ES I SFF CIAL iPITERRt GAT RIES SET TWO ME1 0E FP fi DE L OF M CHAiL J LI 3MAN TC