arrow left
arrow right
  • BRYAN TRUJILLO, et al  vs.  STEPHEN MAGEE, et al(23) Unlimited Other PI/PD/WD document preview
  • BRYAN TRUJILLO, et al  vs.  STEPHEN MAGEE, et al(23) Unlimited Other PI/PD/WD document preview
  • BRYAN TRUJILLO, et al  vs.  STEPHEN MAGEE, et al(23) Unlimited Other PI/PD/WD document preview
  • BRYAN TRUJILLO, et al  vs.  STEPHEN MAGEE, et al(23) Unlimited Other PI/PD/WD document preview
						
                                

Preview

1 GARRY L. MONTANARI, State Bar No. 89790 WESLEY S. WENIG, State Bar No. 162351 2 JOHN H. MOON, State Bar No. 253811 MICHAELIS, MONTANARI & JOHNSON, P.C. 3 4333 Park Terrace Dr. #100 Westlake Village, CA 91361 4 Telephone No.: (818) 865-0444 5 Attorneys for Defendants, STEPHEN MAGEE and SAC AERO FLYING CLUB, INC. 6 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 10 11 BRYAN TRUJILLO and CINDY ) Case No.: 18CIV01901 12 TRUJILLO, ) Honorable Nancy Fineman; Dept. 4 ) 13 Plaintiffs, ) AMENDED NOTICE OF ADDRESS ) CORRECTION TO MOTION IN 14 vs. ) LIMINE NO. 13 ) [AUTHORIZED BY JUDGE 15 ) FINEMAN] STEPHEN MAGEE, SAC AERO FLYING ) Date: January 31, 2023 16 CLUB, INC. and DOES 1 - 50, ) Time: 2:00 p.m. ) Dept.: 4 17 Defendants. ) Complaint filed: April 17, 2018 ) Trial Date: May 3, 2023 18 19 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: 20 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the hearing on January 31, 2023 at 2:00 p.m., or as soon 21 thereafter as the matter may be heard in Department 4 of the above-entitled Court, located at 800 22 North Humbolt, San Mateo, CA 94401 pertaining to defendants STEPHEN MAGEE's and SAC 23 AERO FLYING CLUB, lNC.'s motion in limine No.13. 24 DATED: January 12, 2023 MICHAELIS, MONTANARI & JOHNSON By:_____,~~=a{)A=~~~~~~o-c-~·-~'i~ll""'J-- 25 26 __ "GAilR1i'.t. MONTANARI ""' 27 Attorneys for Defendants, STEPHEN MAGEE and SAC AERO 28 N:\17517\pld\trial\Trial - May 2023\p-amended.ntc.wpd FL YING CLUB, INC. -1- AMENDED NOTICE OF ADDRESS CORRECTION TO MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 13 1 PROOF OF SERVICE 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) S.S. 3 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) 4 I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a paiiy to the within action; my business address is 4333 Park Terrace Dr. # 100, Westlake 5 Village, California 91361. 6 On Januai-y 12, 2023, I served the foregoing document described as AMENDED NOTICE OF ADDRESS CORRECTION TO MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 13 on the interested parties in 7 this action by placing a true copy thereof in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid in the United States mail at Westlake Village, California, addressed as follows: 8 9 Michael S. Danko, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Michael Smith, Esq. 1O Danko Meredith 333 Twin Dolphin Dr. # 145 11 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 tel: (650) 453-3600; fax: (650) 394-8672 12 Email: mdanko<@dankolaw.com; msmith@dankolaw.com 13 [] (MAIL) I deposited such envelope addressed in the mail at Westlake Village, California. The envelope was mailed with postage thereon fully prepaid. I am "readily familiar" with film 's 14 practice of collection ai1d processing correspondence for mailing. It is deposited with U.S. postal service on that san1e day in the ordinary course of business. I am awai·e that on motion of party 15 served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than 1 day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. 16 17 [X] (ELECTRONIC TRANSFER) I caused all of the pages of the above-entitled document to be sent to the recipient noted above via electronic transfer (email) at the respective email addresses 18 indicated above because of the COVID-19 virus. 19 [] (FEDERAL EXPRESS) I deposited such envelope addressed at the Federal Express office located at Westlake Village, California. The envelope was mailed fully prepaid. I am "readily 2o familiar" with firm 's practice of collection ai1d processing correspondence for mailing with Federal Express. It is deposited with the Westlake Village Federal Express service on that san1e day in the 21 ordinary course of business. I am awai·e that on motion of pai·ty served, service is presumed invalid if cancellation date is more than 1 day after date of deposit for overnight mailing in affidavit. 22 23 I declai·e w1der penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and c01Tect. 24 28