On September 11, 2018 a
Complaint,Petition
was filed
involving a dispute between
Bradbury D.D.S., Michael G,
Bradbury, Rhonda,
Odeh, Ali,
and
Cohan, Kat,
Odeh, Ali,
Fernandez D.D.S, Lyngladen,
Fernandez Dds, Lyngladen,
Kingsley Dentistry,
Kingsly Dentistry,
Lyngadlen Fernandez Dds,
Lyngladen Fernandez D.D.S.,
Ringo Bangalan Dds,
Silagan-Fernandez D.D.S., Lyngadlen,
Suarez-Fernandez Dentistry,
Suarez Fernandez Dentistry And Ringo Bangalan, Dds,
for Medical Malpractice Unlimited
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
F I L E D
SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA
COUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO
G. Michael Bradbury, DDS SA“ BERNARD” D'STR'CT
Rhonda Bradbury
31525 Larga Vista 31525 Larga Vista DEC 0 4 2020
Valley Center CA 92082 Valley Center CA 92082 1‘
760-751-1 155 760-751-1 155
mike@bhllc.us rhonda@'bhilc.us
m
Intervenor in pro per Intervenor in pro per
10
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
11
FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
12
13
UNLIMITED CIVIL CASE
Ali Odeh
l4 Plaintifi', No. CIVDS 1823772
15 Vs
VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR
16
Lyngadlen Silagan—Fernandez, DDS;
Kingsly Dentistry and Ringo Bangalan,
1) FORGERY
17 FRAUD
2)
DDS
18
3) FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT
Defendants 4) INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCE
19 WITH PROSPECTIVE ECONOMIC
G. Michael Bradbury, DDS, Rhonda
ADVANTAGE
20 5) NEGLIGENT INTERFERENCE WITH
Bradbury,
21
PROSPECTIVE ECONOMC
Intervenors
ADVANTAGE
22 Vs.
6) VIOLATION OF CALIFORNIA
PENAL CODE 115
23
Ali Odeh; Kat Cohan,
7) DEFAMATION PER SE
8) INTENTIONAL INFLICTION 0F
24
Intervenees
EMOTIONAL DISTRESS
25 9) IDENTITY THEFT
10) INTRUSION INTO SECLUSION
26
2'7
28
1
VERIFIED PLEADING BRADBURY
COME NOW INTERVENORS G. MICHAEL BRADBURY, DDS AND RHONDA BRADBURY,
IN PRO PER, FILING THE PRESENT COMPLAINT AGAINST INTERVENEES ALI ODEH
AND KAT COHAN AND STATE THE FOLLOWING.
PARTIES
10
Intervenors G. Michael Bradbury, DDS and Rhonda Bradbmy are married individuals residing
ll
in San Diego County.
12
Intervenee Ali Odeh, Plaintiffin the present matter is an individual residing in Riverside
13 County
. Intervenee Kat Cohan is a licensed attorney whose principal place of business is in Los Angeles
l4
County.
15
l6
II. COMMON OPERATIVE FACTS
Intervenor G. Michael Bradbury (“Mike”) is a semi-retired dentist with oflice in Northern
l7
18
San Diego County. He has been in practice for forty~five years. His current practice consists oi
19 approximately one thousand patients.
20 Intervenor Rhonda Bradbury (“Rhonda”) is the omce manager of Mike’s practice.
2l Despite the fact of the semi-rural are in which Mike’s practice is located, he has a constant
22 stream of patients everyday-patients who rely on his expertise, his strong ethical standards, his:
23 compassionate care and the hos overall sterling reputation.
24 In his long and storied career he has never been sued and, conversely, he has not sued himself.
25 The events that occurred to him and the acts committed against him by intervenes Odeh and
26 Cohan are therefore unprecedented in nature for him.
27
28
2
VERIFIED PLEADING BRADBURY
Document Filed Date
December 04, 2020
Case Filing Date
September 11, 2018
Category
Medical Malpractice Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
F I L E D SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA COUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO G. Michael Bradbury, DDS SA“ BERNARD” D'STR'CT Rhonda Bradbury 31525 Larga Vista 31525 Larga Vista DEC 0 4 2020 Valley Center CA 92082 Valley Center CA 92082 1‘ 760-751-1 155 760-751-1 155 mike@bhllc.us rhonda@'bhilc.us m Intervenor in pro per Intervenor in pro per 10 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 11 FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 12 13 UNLIMITED CIVIL CASE Ali Odeh l4 Plaintifi', No. CIVDS 1823772 15 Vs VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR 16 Lyngadlen Silagan—Fernandez, DDS; Kingsly Dentistry and Ringo Bangalan, 1) FORGERY 17 FRAUD 2) DDS 18 3) FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT Defendants 4) INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCE 19 WITH PROSPECTIVE ECONOMIC G. Michael Bradbury, DDS, Rhonda ADVANTAGE 20 5) NEGLIGENT INTERFERENCE WITH Bradbury, 21 PROSPECTIVE ECONOMC Intervenors ADVANTAGE 22 Vs. 6) VIOLATION OF CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE 115 23 Ali Odeh; Kat Cohan, 7) DEFAMATION PER SE 8) INTENTIONAL INFLICTION 0F 24 Intervenees EMOTIONAL DISTRESS 25 9) IDENTITY THEFT 10) INTRUSION INTO SECLUSION 26 2'7 28 1 VERIFIED PLEADING BRADBURY COME NOW INTERVENORS G. MICHAEL BRADBURY, DDS AND RHONDA BRADBURY, IN PRO PER, FILING THE PRESENT COMPLAINT AGAINST INTERVENEES ALI ODEH AND KAT COHAN AND STATE THE FOLLOWING. PARTIES 10 Intervenors G. Michael Bradbury, DDS and Rhonda Bradbmy are married individuals residing ll in San Diego County. 12 Intervenee Ali Odeh, Plaintiffin the present matter is an individual residing in Riverside 13 County . Intervenee Kat Cohan is a licensed attorney whose principal place of business is in Los Angeles l4 County. 15 l6 II. COMMON OPERATIVE FACTS Intervenor G. Michael Bradbury (“Mike”) is a semi-retired dentist with oflice in Northern l7 18 San Diego County. He has been in practice for forty~five years. His current practice consists oi 19 approximately one thousand patients. 20 Intervenor Rhonda Bradbury (“Rhonda”) is the omce manager of Mike’s practice. 2l Despite the fact of the semi-rural are in which Mike’s practice is located, he has a constant 22 stream of patients everyday-patients who rely on his expertise, his strong ethical standards, his: 23 compassionate care and the hos overall sterling reputation. 24 In his long and storied career he has never been sued and, conversely, he has not sued himself. 25 The events that occurred to him and the acts committed against him by intervenes Odeh and 26 Cohan are therefore unprecedented in nature for him. 27 28 2 VERIFIED PLEADING BRADBURY