On July 26, 2018 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Antonio Espinosa,
and
Mac 60 Llc,
Royal Home Improvements, Inc.,
for Torts - Other (Labor Law)
in the District Court of Kings County.
Preview
At a Noteof issue Final
ConferencePart ofthe Suprerne Coun
of the
Stateof New York, held in and for the County of Kings,at the
a rehnnce incated
ar un Adams 4tereer Rranklyn em York on the
03 f Novemb
PRESENT:
Hon. Lawrence Knipel CAL. NO.
, Justice/JHO
X
ANTONIO ESPINOSA
PlaintifMs),
AMENDED
-against- FINAL PRE-NOTE ORDER
MAC 60 LLC and ROYAL HOME INDEX NO.515277/2018
IMPROVEMENTS, INC·
Defendant(s)
X
Plaintiff
must fileNote ofIssue on orbefore
Failuretotimely file
the Note ofIssue will in this
result matterbeing placedupon a dispcsiticr.
calendarafterthe Noteof
Issue duedate andmay alsoresultin this
actionbeing dismissed based on wantof prosecution,pursuant to CPLR §3216.
21
Deposition of plaintiff(s): held tobe held O/O/B
G2/21
Deposition ofdefendant(s): held to be heldO/O/B:
Indapandent Medical Fwarr;inations
held __.._ or tobe noticedby Noticed
,,a 115/22 3/15/22
c in he evchancedhv
Deposition of Defendant Royal Home Improvement to be held on 11/18/21
Deposition of Third-Party Defendent Gilmar to be held on 12/2/21
Post EBT Demands and Responses as per CPLR
Third-Party Defendent Gilmar to respond to Plaintiff's CombinedDemands
dated 5/19/21 by_11/2J5/21
Defendant MAC 60 & Royal Home to provide a Supplemental response to
Plaintiff's Combined Demands by 11/15/21
Defendant Mac 60 & Royal Home to serve further Disco_ve_ry.Demands by
11/15/21 & respo_nses to be provided by 12/6/21
There·ebeB·be·ee·ehenge-ofdatee·without·priereenstepproval (see part rules).
The terms of this order supersede the provisions of allprior orders.
Pursuant to CPLR §3126, failureto strictlycomply with thisfinal order, will result in preclusion, the
striking of a pleading and/or sanctions as may be appropriate.
pc: 2/19/20 CC:7/12/19 10/29/19 5/13/20 FCP: 6/21/21 Other:
ON CONSENT JUSTICE/J.H.O.
-FOR•*PPE*ilbtNeis9Nt-v
Attomey Firm ORESKY & ASSOCIATES _by Steven Labell ANTONIO ESPINOSA
for Plaintifits)
"Faye" Sullieman
AttorneyFirm KlERNAN TREBACH LLP by Afaf MAC 60 LLC & pYAL
for Defendant(s) HOlUlE
AttorneyFirm RAWLE &_HENDERSON LLP by Richard B. Poiner GlLMAR
__ for Defendant(s)
Document Filed Date
November 03, 2021
Case Filing Date
July 26, 2018
Category
Torts - Other (Labor Law)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
At a Noteof issue Final ConferencePart ofthe Suprerne Coun of the Stateof New York, held in and for the County of Kings,at the a rehnnce incated ar un Adams 4tereer Rranklyn em York on the 03 f Novemb PRESENT: Hon. Lawrence Knipel CAL. NO. , Justice/JHO X ANTONIO ESPINOSA PlaintifMs), AMENDED -against- FINAL PRE-NOTE ORDER MAC 60 LLC and ROYAL HOME INDEX NO.515277/2018 IMPROVEMENTS, INC· Defendant(s) X Plaintiff must fileNote ofIssue on orbefore Failuretotimely file the Note ofIssue will in this result matterbeing placedupon a dispcsiticr. calendarafterthe Noteof Issue duedate andmay alsoresultin this actionbeing dismissed based on wantof prosecution,pursuant to CPLR §3216. 21 Deposition of plaintiff(s): held tobe held O/O/B G2/21 Deposition ofdefendant(s): held to be heldO/O/B: Indapandent Medical Fwarr;inations held __.._ or tobe noticedby Noticed ,,a 115/22 3/15/22 c in he evchancedhv Deposition of Defendant Royal Home Improvement to be held on 11/18/21 Deposition of Third-Party Defendent Gilmar to be held on 12/2/21 Post EBT Demands and Responses as per CPLR Third-Party Defendent Gilmar to respond to Plaintiff's CombinedDemands dated 5/19/21 by_11/2J5/21 Defendant MAC 60 & Royal Home to provide a Supplemental response to Plaintiff's Combined Demands by 11/15/21 Defendant Mac 60 & Royal Home to serve further Disco_ve_ry.Demands by 11/15/21 & respo_nses to be provided by 12/6/21 There·ebeB·be·ee·ehenge-ofdatee·without·priereenstepproval (see part rules). The terms of this order supersede the provisions of allprior orders. Pursuant to CPLR §3126, failureto strictlycomply with thisfinal order, will result in preclusion, the striking of a pleading and/or sanctions as may be appropriate. pc: 2/19/20 CC:7/12/19 10/29/19 5/13/20 FCP: 6/21/21 Other: ON CONSENT JUSTICE/J.H.O. -FOR•*PPE*ilbtNeis9Nt-v Attomey Firm ORESKY & ASSOCIATES _by Steven Labell ANTONIO ESPINOSA for Plaintifits) "Faye" Sullieman AttorneyFirm KlERNAN TREBACH LLP by Afaf MAC 60 LLC & pYAL for Defendant(s) HOlUlE AttorneyFirm RAWLE &_HENDERSON LLP by Richard B. Poiner GlLMAR __ for Defendant(s)