Preview
MATERN LAW GROUP, PC
MATTHEW MATERN (SBN
J. 159798)
W, Hon EDRT
LAUNA ADOLPH (SBN 227743) 09m $85558 NARDNO
ELLIE D. GORALNICK (SBN 326276) D'NO DISTRICT
1230 Rosecrans Avenue, Suite 200
Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 APR 2 2 2022
Tel: (310) 531—1900
\OOONO‘NLII-PUJNy—t
Facsimile: (310) 531—1901
Attorneys for Plaintiffs SIGIFREDO
By apt MU Deputy
LUPIAN, individually and on behalf of all
other aggrieved employees
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
E Y FAX
SIGIFREDO LUPIAN, individually and on CASE NO. CIVDS 1936613
behalf 0f all other aggrieved employees, .
[A551gned for all Purposes t0 the Hon. Donald
Alvarez, Dept. 823]
Plaintiff,
PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL
VS- NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION
TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STAY
GOLD STAR FOODS, INC., a Delaware . . . . . .
corporation, and DOES 1 through 50, [Flled concurrently w1th Plalntlft‘s Opposmon
inclusive, toDefendant’s Motion t0 Stay; and
Declaration of Ellie D. Goralnick]
NNNNNNNNr—Ir—dr—Ar—tr—tt—Ir—tr—IHH
De fendants .
NGUI$UJNHOKOOONONKII$UJNHO
Date: May 5, 2022
Time: 9:00 a.m.
Dept: $23
Complaint Filed: December 4, 2019
Trial Date: September 12, 2022
28
MATERN LAW GROUP, PC
1230ROSECRANS
AVENUE, STE 200
MANHATTAN BEACH, CA 1
PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL
90266 NOTICE
Plaintiff Sigifredo Lupian (“Plaintiff”) respectfully requests this court take judicial notice
of the following documents attached as exhibits hereto, submitted in conjunction with Plaintiff’s
Opposition to Defendant’s Motion t0 Stay:
Exhibit 1: Petition for Writ of Certiorari in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Mariana (Case
No. B297327, 2020 WL 5584508). V
Exhibit 2: Trial Order Denying Motion t0 Stay in Belofl v. Brita Products Company,
Alameda County Case N0. C-822817, October 25, 2002.
Exhibit 3: Trial Order in Naranjo v. General Nutrition Corp, Alameda County Case N0.
RG12-6l9626, May 15, 2020.
10 Exhibit 4: Tfial Order denying stay in ABM Industries Overtime Cases, San Francisco
11 County Case No. CJC—07—004502, December 8, 2020.
12 Exhibit 5: Tentative Ruling denying stay in Adams v. Pacific Villa, Ina, et al., Los Angeles
13 Superior Court Case N0. ZOSTCV37260, April 11, 2022. Plaintiff submits the tentative ruling
14 because the final order has not yet issued as of the time of this filing.
15 Exhibit 6: Trial Order denying stay in Lopez v. Aircraft Service International, Ina, et al.,
16 Central District 0f California Case N0. CV 21-7108—DMG, April 7, 2022.
17 Exhibit 7: Trial Order granting joint motion t0 stay in Radcliffv. San Diego Gas & Electric
18 Company, Southern District of California Case No. 20-cv-1555-H—MSB.
19 Exhibit 8: Order granting joint stipulation t0 stay in Buckhanon v. San Diego Gas &
20 Electric Company, San Diego County Case No. 37-2020-00013922—CU-OE-NC.
21 Upon the request of a party, the Court may take judicial notice of “[o]fficial acts of
22 legislative, executive, and judicial departments of the United States and of any state 0f the United
23 States,” as well as 0f “[r]ecords 0f (1) a court of this state or (2) any court 0f record 0f the United
24 States.” Evid. Code, § 452, subds. (c) and (d). The trial court shall take judicial notice of such
25 records where a party has given sufficient notice to the adverse party and has provided the Court
26 with sufficient information to enable it to take judicial notice of the matter. 1d,, §453.
27 Exhibit 1 is a document filed in a matter proceeding before the United States Supreme
28 Court. Exhibits 2 and 3 are documents filed in matters proceeding before the Superior Court for
MATERN LAW GROUP, PC
1230ROSECRANS
AVENUE, STE 200
PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL
2 NOTICE
MANHATTAN BEACH, CA
90266
Preview
MATERN LAW GROUP, PC MATTHEW MATERN (SBN J. 159798) W, Hon EDRT LAUNA ADOLPH (SBN 227743) 09m $85558 NARDNO ELLIE D. GORALNICK (SBN 326276) D'NO DISTRICT 1230 Rosecrans Avenue, Suite 200 Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 APR 2 2 2022 Tel: (310) 531—1900 \OOONO‘NLII-PUJNy—t Facsimile: (310) 531—1901 Attorneys for Plaintiffs SIGIFREDO By apt MU Deputy LUPIAN, individually and on behalf of all other aggrieved employees SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO E Y FAX SIGIFREDO LUPIAN, individually and on CASE NO. CIVDS 1936613 behalf 0f all other aggrieved employees, . [A551gned for all Purposes t0 the Hon. Donald Alvarez, Dept. 823] Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL VS- NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STAY GOLD STAR FOODS, INC., a Delaware . . . . . . corporation, and DOES 1 through 50, [Flled concurrently w1th Plalntlft‘s Opposmon inclusive, toDefendant’s Motion t0 Stay; and Declaration of Ellie D. Goralnick] NNNNNNNNr—Ir—dr—Ar—tr—tt—Ir—tr—IHH De fendants . NGUI$UJNHOKOOONONKII$UJNHO Date: May 5, 2022 Time: 9:00 a.m. Dept: $23 Complaint Filed: December 4, 2019 Trial Date: September 12, 2022 28 MATERN LAW GROUP, PC 1230ROSECRANS AVENUE, STE 200 MANHATTAN BEACH, CA 1 PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL 90266 NOTICE Plaintiff Sigifredo Lupian (“Plaintiff”) respectfully requests this court take judicial notice of the following documents attached as exhibits hereto, submitted in conjunction with Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Motion t0 Stay: Exhibit 1: Petition for Writ of Certiorari in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Mariana (Case No. B297327, 2020 WL 5584508). V Exhibit 2: Trial Order Denying Motion t0 Stay in Belofl v. Brita Products Company, Alameda County Case N0. C-822817, October 25, 2002. Exhibit 3: Trial Order in Naranjo v. General Nutrition Corp, Alameda County Case N0. RG12-6l9626, May 15, 2020. 10 Exhibit 4: Tfial Order denying stay in ABM Industries Overtime Cases, San Francisco 11 County Case No. CJC—07—004502, December 8, 2020. 12 Exhibit 5: Tentative Ruling denying stay in Adams v. Pacific Villa, Ina, et al., Los Angeles 13 Superior Court Case N0. ZOSTCV37260, April 11, 2022. Plaintiff submits the tentative ruling 14 because the final order has not yet issued as of the time of this filing. 15 Exhibit 6: Trial Order denying stay in Lopez v. Aircraft Service International, Ina, et al., 16 Central District 0f California Case N0. CV 21-7108—DMG, April 7, 2022. 17 Exhibit 7: Trial Order granting joint motion t0 stay in Radcliffv. San Diego Gas & Electric 18 Company, Southern District of California Case No. 20-cv-1555-H—MSB. 19 Exhibit 8: Order granting joint stipulation t0 stay in Buckhanon v. San Diego Gas & 20 Electric Company, San Diego County Case No. 37-2020-00013922—CU-OE-NC. 21 Upon the request of a party, the Court may take judicial notice of “[o]fficial acts of 22 legislative, executive, and judicial departments of the United States and of any state 0f the United 23 States,” as well as 0f “[r]ecords 0f (1) a court of this state or (2) any court 0f record 0f the United 24 States.” Evid. Code, § 452, subds. (c) and (d). The trial court shall take judicial notice of such 25 records where a party has given sufficient notice to the adverse party and has provided the Court 26 with sufficient information to enable it to take judicial notice of the matter. 1d,, §453. 27 Exhibit 1 is a document filed in a matter proceeding before the United States Supreme 28 Court. Exhibits 2 and 3 are documents filed in matters proceeding before the Superior Court for MATERN LAW GROUP, PC 1230ROSECRANS AVENUE, STE 200 PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL 2 NOTICE MANHATTAN BEACH, CA 90266