On August 10, 2016 a
Motion,Ex Parte
was filed
involving a dispute between
Bush, Lori,
Dignity Health, A Califonia Corporation,
and
Dignity Health, A Califonia Corporation,
St. Bernadine Medical Center A Business Entity Unknown,
Total Professional Network, Inc,
for Medical Malpractice Unlimited
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
LAW OFFICES 0F MICHAEL J. LIBMAN, APC
MICHAEL J. LIBMAN (SBN 222353)
ZHANNA SANAMYAN (SBN 337133)
18321 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 700
Tarzana, California 91356
Telephone: (818) 995-7300
Facsimile: (866) 644-6764
F | D
L E
SUPERIOR cowgsfigow
mil@libmanlaw.com chmgsAgnluo DQSTRICT
GARY BERKOVICH (SBN 192731) FEB 1 4 2022
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
14900 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 220
Sherman Oaks, California 91403
Telephone: (818) 465-9505
Facsimile: (818) 358-2829
lO Attorneys for Plaintiff, LORI BUSH
ll
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
12
FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
l3
LORI BUSH, an individual; CASE NUMBER: CIVDSl613 161
l4
Hon. John M. Pacheco
Plaintiff,
15 Dept: S31
vs.
l6 PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE NO.
3 TO PRECLUDE ENTIRELY OR LIMIT
l7
ST. BERNARDINE MEDICAL CENTER, a DEFENDANTS’ EXPERT WITNESSES
18 business entity form unknown; DIGNITY THOMAS L. PARCO’S AND MAURICE
HEALTH, a California Corporation; and
ESPINOZA’S OPINIONS AND
l9 DOES 1 through 200, inclusive
VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
TESTIMONY; [PROPOSED ORDER]
20 DECLARATION OF MICHAEL J.
Defendants. LIBMAN, ESQ. FILED CONCURENTLY
21
Trial Date: February 14, 2022
22
23
24
25 TO THE HONORABLE COURT, DEFENDANTS AND THEIR RESPECTIVE
26
ATTORNEYS 0F RECORD:
27 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on the above date and time in Dept. S31 of Saw
28 Bemardino Superior Court located at 247 w. 3rd Street, San Bemardino, CA 92415, Plaintiff
LORI BUSH hereby moves this court for an Order In Limine No. 3 for Orders :
1
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 3 TO PRECLUDE ENTIRELY OR LIMIT DEFENDANTS’ EXPERT
WITNESSES THOMAS L. PARCO’S AND MAURICE ESPINOZA’S OPINIONS AND TESTIMONY
(1) Exclude entirely 0r limit Defendants’ experts Thomas L. Parco’s and Maurice
Espinoza’s testimony, opinions, an evidence;
(2) That the Court further order counsel to instruct their witnesses not to refer to 01+
mention this motion in limine.
This motion is based upon the grounds that such evidence or reference is speculative,
irrelevant, and prejudicial to Plaintiff. The motion is further based upon the supporting
Memorandum of Points and Authorities, the pleadings and papers on file in this action, and upoq
such argument and evidence.
lO
ll
12
DATED: February 9, 2022
By:
WM
LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL LIBMAN, APC
fl
J.
[E-Signature]
l3 MICHAEL J. LIBMAN
l4
BUSH
Attorneys for Plaintiff LORI
15
l6
l7
18
l9
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 3 TO PRECLUDE ENTIRELY OR LIMIT DEFENDANTS’ EXPERT
WITNESSES THOMAS L. PARCO’S AND MAURICE ESPINOZA’S OPINIONS AND TESTIMONY
Document Filed Date
February 14, 2022
Case Filing Date
August 10, 2016
Category
Medical Malpractice Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.