arrow left
arrow right
  • Luis Alberto Herrera v. The City Of New York, Belmont Re, Llc, Sutter Avenue Realty Co. Llc, Trinchese Iron Works & Construction IncTorts - Other Negligence (Personal Injury) document preview
  • Luis Alberto Herrera v. The City Of New York, Belmont Re, Llc, Sutter Avenue Realty Co. Llc, Trinchese Iron Works & Construction IncTorts - Other Negligence (Personal Injury) document preview
  • Luis Alberto Herrera v. The City Of New York, Belmont Re, Llc, Sutter Avenue Realty Co. Llc, Trinchese Iron Works & Construction IncTorts - Other Negligence (Personal Injury) document preview
  • Luis Alberto Herrera v. The City Of New York, Belmont Re, Llc, Sutter Avenue Realty Co. Llc, Trinchese Iron Works & Construction IncTorts - Other Negligence (Personal Injury) document preview
						
                                

Preview

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 01/28/2021 05:28 PM INDEX NO. 512147/2020 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/28/2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS ---------------------------------------------------------------------x Index No.: 512147/2020(ECF) LUIS ALBERTO HERRERA, Plaintiff, AFFIRMATION IN SUPPORT v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, BELMONT RE, LLC AND SUTTER AVENUE REALTY CO., LLC., Defendants. ---------------------------------------------------------------------x SUTTER AVENUE REALTY CO., LLC Third-Party Plaintiff, v. TRINCHESE IRON WORKS & CONSTRUCTION INC., Third-Party Defendant, ---------------------------------------------------------------------x DANIEL P. ROCCO, an attorney duly admitted to practice law in the Courts of the State of New York, affirms the following under the penalties of perjury pursuant to CPLR 2106: 1. I am associated with the firm of EUSTACE, PREZIOSO & YAPCHANYK, attorneys for the Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff Sutter Avenue Realty Co. LLC. 2. This affirmation is submitted in support of the annexed Motion to Compel Bill of Particulars and a response to combined demands. 3. In response to plaintiff's Complaint (Exhibit "A"), an Answer, a Demand for a Bill of Particulars and combined discovery demands (Exhibit "B") were served on plaintiff's counsel. 4. On October 14, 2020, a Good Faith letter (Exhibit "C") was emailed to plaintiff's attorney requesting compliance with our demand for a Bill of Particulars and combined demands. 1 of 2 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 01/28/2021 05:28 PM INDEX NO. 512147/2020 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/28/2021 5. On November 13, 2020, another email was sent to Plaintiff’s counsel requesting a status of their discovery responses (Exhibit “D”). 6. On December 15, 2020, a Good Faith Letter (Exhibit “E”) was filed on the electronic filing website again requesting compliance with our demand for a Bill of Particulars and combined demands. 7. To date, plaintiff’s counsel has made no attempt to respond to our good faith attempts nor have we received the discovery requested. WHEREFORE, it is respectfully requested that this Court issue an Order, pursuant to CPLR §3042(c), compelling plaintiff(s) to serve a Bill of Particulars in response to defendant’s demand and, pursuant to CPLR §3124, compelling plaintiff(s) to respond to Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff combined demands, and for such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper. DATED: January 28, 2021 New York, New York Daniel P. Rocco 2 of 2