Preview
FILED: RICHMOND CIVIL COURT - L&T 08/24/2021 INDEX
03:04 NO.
PM LT-051697-19/RI [HO]
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 77 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/24/2021
CIVIL COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF RICHMOND: HOUSING, PART Y
X
BARD AVENUE REALTY LLC,
Index No. L&T 51697/19
Petitioner,
AFFIRMATION
-against- IN SUPPORT
LELAND ROGAN, HAVA ARIFI,
"JOHN" "DOE" "JANE"
& "DOE", Subject Premises:
142 Bard Avenue, Apt. 30-B
Respondents. Staten Island, NY 10310
X
Emilio Paesano, an attorney duly admitted to practice law before the Courts of the State of
New York, affirms under the penalties of perjury:
1. I am a Supervising Attorney with Mobilization for Justice Inc., which represents
Respondent HAVA ARIFI ("Respondent"). As such, I am familiar with the facts and
circumstances of this case. All statements made upon information and belief are based upon
conversations with my client and/or an examination of the court file,unless otherwise indicated.
2. I make this Affirmation in support of Respondent's Order to Show Cause which seeks an
Order from the Court:
i. Staying execution of the warrant of eviction against Respondent ARIFI through
October 3 2021, pursuant to Section 361 of the Public Health Service Act and the
Order issued by U.S. Centers for Disease & Control on August 3 2021 titled
"Temporary Halt in Residential Evictions in Communities With Substantial or High
Transmission of COVID-19 to Prevent the Further Spread of COVID-19"; and / or,
ii. Staying execution of the warrant pursuant to CPLR § 2201 and RPAPL § 749(3),
because Respondent here demonstrates good cause for said relief and this is her
firstrequest in this proceeding; and / or,
1 of 11
FILED: RICHMOND CIVIL COURT - L&T 08/24/2021 INDEX
03:04 NO.
PM LT-051697-19/RI [HO]
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 77 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/24/2021
iii. Staying execution of the warrant for a reasonable period of time to allow
Respondent ARIFI to vacate with dignity, pursuant to RPAPL § 753(1), because
Respondent here demonstrates extreme hardship; and,
iv. Granting Respondent ARIFI such further reliefas the Court deems just and proper.
3. Ultimately, for the reasons set forth herein, in the Affumation submitted by Sean Davis,
Esq., in Respondent's Affidavit, or in the annexed Memorandum of Law, the Court should grant
Respondent'sorder to Show Cause to the extent of staying execution of the warrant.
Facts
4. Respondent moved into Apt. 30-B, at 142 Bard Avenue, Staten Island, in 2014, and
Respondent has lived there continuously since then. h Affidavit of Respondent, annexed hereto.
5. Respondent moved into Apt. 30-B with Leland Rogan's permission, rendering her a
licensee. See id. In fact, Mr. Rogan offered to attempt to add Respondent to the lease for the
subject premises as a household member, but Respondent declined. See id.
6. Respondent has occupied and resided in Apt. 30-B as her home since 2014. For example,
Respondent has received mail there for several years, Respondent has provided access to agents
of Petitioner for repairs to bedone, and Respondent keeps the apartment clean and tidy. Seeid.
7. Respondent is a person with disabilities and survives on SNAP and Supplemental Security
"1."
Income benefits. See id.;copy of most recent SSI Award Letter, annexed hereto as Exhibit
8. Respondent's household income has gone down substantially since the onset of the
COVID-19 pandemic, because Respondent lost her job as a direct result of the COVID-19
pandemic and wage-earning occupants of the household subsequently moved out. h Affidavit
of Respondent, annexed hereto.
2 of 11
FILED: RICHMOND CIVIL COURT - L&T 08/24/2021 INDEX
03:04 NO.
PM LT-051697-19/RI [HO]
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 77 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/24/2021
9. Despite this reality-lost income, the COVID-19 pandemic, and then the various eviction
moratoria-Respondent secured a CityFHEPS voucher and has been looking desperately for a new
apartment to move to as soon as possible. See id.;copy of CityFHEPS voucher, annexed hereto
"2."
as Exhibit
10. Just since retaining Mobilization For Justice Inc. for representation, Respondent has called
the following numbers for realtors, brokers, and management companies seeking a new apartment
to move to, based on listings Respondent researched herself: 718-442-5200 (Better Homes Realty),
718-420-2300 (Safari 718-
Realty), 917-771-8782, 917-776-6079, 718-238-5520, 646-733-7662,
718-987-7900 718-979-8000 (United 646-
727-1423, 718-373-2701, (Gateway Arms), Realty),
780-0136 (Robert 917-
DeFalco), 718-400-8216, 718-412-8333, 718-675-2232, 917-664-0300,
553-4545, and 973-443-5656. See Affidavit of Respondent, annexed hereto.
11. Upon information and belief, Respondent has called several new phone numbers for
realtors, brokers, and management companies since Respondent signed her annexed Affidavit on
August 18 2021, again seeking a new apartment to move to without delay.
12. However, Respondent has had great difficulty finding another space to live in. For
example, Respondent has been the victim of source of income discrimination by landlords and
owners who have explicitly refused to accept Respondent's CityFHEPS voucher. h Affidavit of
Respondent, annexed hereto; Davis Affirmation, annexed hereto.
13. Respondent is currently filing a claim based precisely on thisdiscrimination with the New
York City Commission on Human Rights. S_ee Affidavit of Respondent, annexed hereto; Davis
Affirmation, annexed hereto. Respondent is hopeful that pursuing the claim will result in
Respondent getting offered an apartment to move to owned by a landlord that will accept
Respondent's CityFHEPS voucher. S_ee Affidavit of Respondent, annexed hereto.
3 of 11
FILED: RICHMOND CIVIL COURT - L&T 08/24/2021 INDEX
03:04 NO.
PM LT-051697-19/RI [HO]
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 77 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/24/2021
14. To quote Respondent, "I did not contemplate that I would be discriminated against, or
understand the realities of the COVID-19 pandemic, when I agreed to move out and my former
2020."
attorney and I signed the settlement on January 17 I_st.
15. As Respondent ARIFI's current counsel, on July 22 2021, I spoke to counsel for Petitioner
and offered to assist Petitioner seek recovery for the entire balance of the alleged use and
occupancy that has come due for the subject premises since June 30 2020, by submitting an
application through the Emergency Rental Assistance Program ("ERAP") in exchange for
Respondent ARIFI retaining some kind of continued possession.
16. It isthe firm belief of the undersigned counsel for Respondent that a settlement could be
structured that would qualify Respondent-and Petitioner-for ERAP benefits, based on
Respondent's prima facie eligibility for ERAP and my own past experiences securing emergency
arrears assistance from the City and State Welfare Agencies in exchange for continued possession.
17. However, on the following day, Petitioner's counsel rejected my offer. See copy of Email
"3."
Exchange, annexed hereto as Exhibit
18. If Respondent was evicted, Respondent would certainly become homeless and would sleep
outside, or at the Staten Island Ferry terminal. See Affidavit of Respondent, annexed hereto.
Respondent has been forced to sleep in a shelter before, multiple times. See id.
Procedural History
19. Petitioner notified Respondents of its intention to recover possession of the subject
Lease,"
apartment using a "Notice Terminating Tenancy, Occupancy, dated January 23, 2019,
which set forth no cause or fault on the part of Respondents as a basis for termination, and set the
termination date as March 31, 2019. S_ee Predicate Notice, NYSCEF Doc. No. 41 (page 9).
4 of 11
FILED: RICHMOND CIVIL COURT - L&T 08/24/2021 INDEX
03:04 NO.
PM LT-051697-19/RI [HO]
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 77 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/24/2021
20. Petitioner then commenced the instant proceeding on June 25, 2019, or June 28, 2019, s_ge
92 Bergenbrooklyn. LLC v. Cisarano, 50 Misc.3d 21, 21 N.Y.S.3d 810 (App. Term 2d Dep't
2015), by serving a Petition dated June 18, 2019, along with a Notice of Petition. See Notice of
Petition & Petition, NYSCEF Doc. No. 41 (pages 7-8, 16, 18, 20).
21. In any event, Petitioner commenced this proceeding after passage of the Housing Stability
and Tenant Protection Act of 2019. Seg L 2019, ch 36, § 1, part M, §29 [June 2019].
22. Upon information and belief, Respondent retained CAMBA Legal Services for
representation and filed an Answer with the assistance of counsel on August 2, 2019. S_e_e
NYSCEF Doc. No. 1; NYSCEF Doc. No. 41 (pages 100-2).
23. On August 5, 2019, the Court found that Respondent "is not able to effectively defend...
interests,"
her rights and protect... her and appointed Jeffrey Saltiel as her guardian ad litem in
thisproceeding. S_ge Order Appointing GAL, NYSCEF Doc. No. 41 (pages 3-4).
24. Upon information and belief, Respondent filed an Amended Answer with the assistance of
counsel on October 25, 2019. See NYSCEF Doc. No. 1; NYSCEF Doc. No. 41 (pages 104-9).
25. The parties engaged in some motion practice once Petitioner moved to strike Respondent's
defenses, and the matter was adjourned. S_e_eNYSCEF Doc. No. 1.
26. Then, on January 17, 2020, the parties entered into a stipulation of settlement containing
the following terms:
i. Respondent ROGEN surrendered possession of the subject premises and the
proceeding was dismissed as against him;
ii. Respondent affirmed that she was then in possession of the subject premises with
Jonathan Flanagan and her brother, Ferhat Arifi, and Petitioner "reserve[d] itsrights
for inquest against such individuals and John Doe & Jane Doe";
iii. Respondent consented to the entry of a final judgment against herself, issuance of
the warrant forthwith, execution staying to June 30, 2020, for Respondent to vacate
5 of 11
FILED: RICHMOND CIVIL COURT - L&T 08/24/2021 INDEX
03:04 NO.
PM LT-051697-19/RI [HO]
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 77 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/24/2021
and surrender possession, and that Petitioner may execute the warrant upon default
following service of a marshal's notice;
Arifi."
iv. "Petitioner waives U & O claims against Resp. Hava
See Stipulation of Settlement, NYSCEF Doc. No. 41 (pages 1-2).
27. The judgment was entered against Respondent that same day pursuant to the terms of the
"5,"
stipulation, sge Judgment, NYSCEF Doc. No. 41 (page 99), annexed hereto as Exhibit but the
clerk did not issue the warrant. See id.;NYSCEF Doc. No. 1.
28. The COVID-19 pandemic halted all but essential functions within the New York City
Housing Court system by mid-March 2020.
29. On September 24, 2020, s_ee NYSCEF Doc. No. 1, Petitioner moved pursuant to DRP 213
for issuance of the warrant as against Respondent, leave to execute the warrant against Respondent,
and restoration of the instant proceeding for an inquest against John Doe and Jane Doe. S_e_e
NYSCEF Doc. No. 41 (pages 21-2).
30. Respondent discharged CAMBA Legal Services on November 6, 2020, and Petitioner's
motion was then granted by the Court on November 17, 2020, to the following extent: 'The warrant
shall issue and execute forthwith by service of marshal's notice as against Hava Arifi and Inquest
Doe."
shall be held on December 3, 2020 at 9:30 a.m. as against John and Jane NYSCEF Doc.
No. 41 (pages 21-2).
31. The inquest was held on December 3, 2020, and then on December 8, 2020, the Honorable
Judge Remy Smith issued the following ruling: "The Court finds that Petitioner established entitled
to judgment of possession but does not enter same while DRP-205, prohibiting entry of default
judgment, is ineffect. After such time, Petitioner is invited to submit an Order on notice for Entry
Respondents'
of Judgment with an accompanying Affidavit from one with knowledge as the
status."
military NYSCEF Doc. No. 41 (pages 5-6).
6 of 11
FILED: RICHMOND CIVIL COURT - L&T 08/24/2021 INDEX
03:04 NO.
PM LT-051697-19/RI [HO]
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 77 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/24/2021
32. On December 28, 2020, Governor Cuomo signed into law the "COVID-19 Emergency
2020,"
Eviction and Foreclosure Prevention Act of (L 2020, Ch. 381) ("the Act").
33. Earlier that day, Petitioner attempted to challenge the Decision / Order issued by Judge
Smith on December s_ee NYSCEF Doc. No. 9 - which motion the Court
8, 2020, 17-1, initially
calendared for Janüãry 12, 2021, se_e NYSCEF Doc. No. 17, but then appears to have denied
without prejudice based on passage of the Act.
34. Petitioner filed its first attempt to deprive Respondent of the protections of the Act on
January 14, 2021, s_ge NYSCEF Doc. 18-24, but Judge Smith declined to sign this Order to Show
Cause. S_eeeNYSCEF Doc. No. 25.
35. Respondent submitted a hardship declaration to the Court, which Respondent signed on
"A,"
February 11, 2021, and wherein Respondent selected option indicating that she was then
"experiencing financial hardship". NYSCEF Doc. No. 41 (pages 125-6).
36. On March 2, 2021, Petitioner filed a second Order to Show Cause seeking to deprive
Respondent of the protections of the s_ee NYSCEF Doc. No. 27 - other branches
Act, 40, among
of relief,and this Order to Show Cause was signed by the Court, see NYSCEF Doc. No. 39, and
then subsequently adjourned.
37. Respondent retained Mobilization for Justice Inc. for representation on May 31, 2021.
38. On July 21, 2021, over Respondent ARIFI's objection, Judge Smith issued a Decision /
Order which: (i)lifted the stay mandated by the Act; (ii)granted to Petitioner a final judgment of
possession as against Respondents JOHN DOE and JANE DOE, issuance of the warrants
forthwith, and execution forthwith; and (iii)granted to Petitioner issuance of a warrant against
Respondent HAVA ARIFI forthwith, execution forthwith. S_e_eNYSCEF Doc. No. 63.
7 of 11
FILED: RICHMOND CIVIL COURT - L&T 08/24/2021 INDEX
03:04 NO.
PM LT-051697-19/RI [HO]
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 77 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/24/2021
39. Comprehensive warrants were requisitioned by City Marshal Henry Daley the following
day, on July 22 2021, se_e NYSCEF Doc. No. 65-66, the judgments against Respondents JOHN
DOE and JANE DOE issued on July 23 2021, s_ee NYSCEF Doc. No. 69, and then upon
information and belief the warrants against Respondents ARIFI, JOHN DOE, and JANE DOE
issued shortly thereafter.
40. On August 3 2021, the U.S. Centers for Disease & Control ("CDC") issued an Order
extending the federal eviction moratorium, titled "Temporary Halt in Residential Evictions in
Communities With Substantial or High Transmission of COVID-19 to Prevent the Further Spread
COVID-19," "4,"
of se_e copy of Order, annexed hereto as Exhibit which was then recorded in the
43,244.1
Federal Register on August 6 2021. S_e_e86 Fed. Reg.
41. This Order limited the protections granted therein to "any tenant, lessee, or resident of a
residential property who provides to their landlord, the owner of the residential property, or other
person with a legal right to pursue eviction or a possessory action, a declaration under penalty of
indicating"
perjury inter alia that "individual resides in a U.S. county experiencing substantial or
CDC."
high rates of community transmission levels of SARS-CoV-2 as defined by If
Tracker"
42. The CDC created a section of its "COVID Data webpage titled "COVID-19
View,"
Integrated County which is updated daily at 8pm, and-as of August 24 2021-this
currently2
website reflects the determination by the CDC that Richmond County is experiencing
"high rates of commuñity transmission levels of SARS-CoV-2". See printout of CDC Website
"5."
(lastvisited 8-24-21), annexed hereto as Exhibit
1 See https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/08/06/2021-16945/temporary-halt-in-residential-evictions-in-
communities-with-substantial-or-high-transmission-of
2 S_e_e Finds an
eg._ Kimiko de Freytas-Tamura, A Hospital Unlikely Group Opposing Vaccination:itsWorkers,
N.Y. TIMES (Aug. 22, 2021), https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/22/nyregion/staten-island-covid-vaccine-
mandate.html
8 of 11
FILED: RICHMOND CIVIL COURT - L&T 08/24/2021 INDEX
03:04 NO.
PM LT-051697-19/RI [HO]
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 77 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/24/2021
43. On August 13 2021, upon information and belief, Marshal Daley resorted to conspicuous
placement in the course of allegedly attempting to serve a Notice of Eviction upon Respondent,
which Notice sets August 30 2021 as the first date upon which the eviction could be scheduled.
"6."
Seg copy of Notice of Eviction, annexed hereto as Exhibit
44. On August 18 2021, Respondent ARIFI signed the Eviction Protection Declaration
promulgated by the CDC following issuance of the August 3 2021 Order, s_e_e copy of Arifi
"7,"
Declaration, NYSCEF Doc. No. 71, annexed hereto as Exhibit and then through her
undersigned counsel served the Declaration upon Petitioner itself, Petitioner's counsel,
Respondent's guardian ad litem, and the remaining parties between August 19 and 20 2021, s_e_e
"8,"
Affirmation of Service re Declaration, NYSCEF Doc. No. 72, annexed hereto as Exhibit and
on August 20 2021, filed a copy of the Declaration with the Court.
45. Specifically, on August 20 2021, Respondent's undersigned counsel served Respondent's
Declaration upon Petitioner BARD AVENUE REALTY LLC, c/o Shoshy Feldman, using P.O.
Box 190307, Brooklyn, New York, 11219, sge ist,because Petitioner has caused this address to
be listed as its address on the Multiple Dwelling Registration statement filed for the subject
premises with the New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development. S_e_g
DHPD website (last visited 8-24-21).
46. Later in the day on August 20 2021, an employee working for Marshal Daley conveyed
over the phone to the undersigned counsel for Respondent this employee's determination that
Respondent's CDC Declaration did not operate to stay execution of the warrant-based on a legal
conclusion that numerous Courts in the United States have rejected and despite the onerous
penalties for non-compliance set forth in the August 3 Order-and that as a result Marshal Daley
intended to proceed with the eviction unless the Court issued an Order to Show Cause.
9 of 11
FILED: RICHMOND CIVIL COURT - L&T 08/24/2021 INDEX
03:04 NO.
PM LT-051697-19/RI [HO]
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 77 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/24/2021
47. On August 23 2021, Respondent filed a Notice of Appeal regarding the Decision/Order
issued on July 21 2021 and the Judgment entered on July 23 2021. See NYSCEF Doc. No. 73-5.
Arguments & Conclusions
48. The Court should stay execution of the warrant against Respondent ARIFI through October
3 2021, pursuant to Section 361 of the Public Health Service Act and the eviction moratorium
issued by U.S. Centers for Disease & Control on August 3 2021, because Respondent has satisfied
Person"
the definition of "Covered set forth in the CDC Order and the resulting moratorium should
be interpreted to apply to the instant proceeding.
49. Alternatively, or in conjunction, the Court should stay execution of the warrant pursuant to
CPLR § 2201 and RPAPL § 749(3), because the facts set forth herein, in the Davis Affinnation,
and in Respondent's Affidavit constitute good cause for said relief.
50. Alternatively, or in conjunction, the Court should stay execution of the warrant for a
reasonable period of time to allow Respondent ARIFI to vacate with dignity, pursuant to RPAPL
§ 753(1), because Respondent herein has demonstrated extreme hardship.
51. The Court is respectfully directed to the annexed Memorandum of Law for
citations, case law, and analysis in support of these conclusions. See copies of Decisions
"9."
interpreting CDC Moratorium, annexed hereto as Exhibit
WHEREFORE, Respondent ARIFI prays that the relief sought herein be granted.
Dated: August , 2021 .
Brooklyn, New York Emilio Paesano, of counsel to
Tiffany A. Liston, Esq.
Mobilization for Justice, Inc.
10 of 11
FILED: RICHMOND CIVIL COURT - L&T 08/24/2021 INDEX
03:04 NO.
PM LT-051697-19/RI [HO]
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 77 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/24/2021
Index No. L&T 51697 Year 2019
CIVIL COURT OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF RICHMOND: HOUSING, PART Y
BARD AVENUE REALTY LLC,
Petitioner,
-against-
LELAND ROGAN, HAVA ARIFI,
"JOHN" "DOE" "JANE"
& "DOE", Subject Premises:
142 Bard Avenue, Apt. 30-B
Respondents. Staten Island, NY 10310
AFFIRMATION IN SUPPORT
Mobilization for Justice, Inc.
Attorneys for Respondent HAVA AR1FI
424 East 147th Street, 3rd Floor
Bronx, NY 10455
417 - 3818
(212)
epaesano@mfilegal.org
Emilio Paesano, an attorneyduly adrnittedto the Courts of theState ofNew York, hereby certifiesthatthe annexed
papers are tothebest ofmy knowledge and upon information and belief,formed afteran inquiry reasonable under the
circurn£ences, thatthe presentationof saidpapers or contentionstherein arenot frivolousas defined insubsection (c)
of section130-1.1 of 22 NYCRR.
Dated: August , 2021
Brooklyn, New York
11 of 11