MOTION IN LIMINE re: Financial Condition

On April 1, 2019 a case was filed by Diane Saracino, represented by Kennedy Johnson Schwab & Roberge Llc, against Huntington Senior Housing Limited Partnership, and Mutual Housing Association Of Southwestern Connecticut, Inc., represented by Esty & Buckmir Llc, in the jurisdiction of Fairfield County. Judge Barry K. Stevens presiding.

                        
Preview
2285 Whitney Avenue Hamden, Connecticut 06518 Tel. (203) 248-5678. ESTY & BUCKMIR, LLC Juris No. 415435 Fax 203-288-9974 DOCKET NO. FBT-CV19-6084679-S : | SUPERIOR COURT DIANE SARACINO : J.D. OF FAIRFIELD vs. : AT BRIDGEPORT MUTUAL HOUSING ASSOCIATION OF : DECEMBER 2, 2022 SOUTHWESTERN CT, INC., ET AL MOTION IN LIMINE RE: FINANCIAL CONDITION Pursuant to Connecticut Practice Book §15-3, the defendants move to exclude any and all evidence regarding the financial condition of the defendants and/or ownership of other rental properties. Specifically, the financial condition of the defendants, including the fact that they may own other property, is totally irrelevant. Specifically, relevant evidence is evidence that will make a fact in dispute more or less probable. Connecticut Code of Evidence §4-1 et. seq. Here, whether the defendants own other property does not make any fact in dispute more or less probable. See also Sullivan v. Hopkins, 40 Conn. Sup. 183 (1984) (where nature o…

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope