Preview
FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2022 05:30 PM INDEX NO. 601516/2019
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 73 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2022
DR E X E L U N I V ER S I T Y
Steinbright
Career Development Center
Employer DataRequestfor
Jaidan Industries
I. UnderstandingYourReport..........................................................................2
II. EmployerHiringHistory............ .............. .................... .3
III.StudentEvaluationResults...........................................................................4
A. Qualitative Evaluation Data .............................
........ ....... 5
1. Question: Describe your co-op position as you would on your resume 5
2. Question: Describe challenges/drawbacks you experienced in the position and/or workplace. .. .... 6
3. Qüésties: Describe the best features of your position and employer 5
4. Questicñ: Would you consider returning to your co-op employer. 7
5. Question: Based on your experience, the provided job description was accurate...........................
9
Compiled August 2018 by the Steinbright Career Devs|üpment Center 1
EXHIBIT
FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2022 05:30 PM INDEX NO. 601516/2019
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 73 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2022
I. Understanding Your Report
Below, you will find the requested inform±inn for Jaidan Industries and theirparticipation in the Drexel Co-
op
Program. Student evaluaticñ data is focused on the spring/:=nmer 2010-2011 co-op cycle through the
spring/summer 2017-2018 co-op cycle.
Enrployer Hiring History
This sectionmmm-izes the hiring history ofJaidan Industries from spring/ er 2010-2011 co-op cycle
threügh the spring/summer 2017-2018 co-op cycle. Itincludes the sesdemic year, job title,and student's name.
Student Evsination Results
The Student Evaluation Results isthe compilation of c d-.dans completed by 5tudents employed by Jaidan
Industries at theconclusion of each co-op cycle.
Qualitative Results
The qualitative resultsfor the student evaluations are divided into four parts.
resume."
The firstpartisstudent responses to the question "Describe your co-op position as you would on your
employer."
The second partisstudent responses to the question "Describe the best featuresof your pesi'ien and
The thirdpart isstudent responses to the question "Describe any chr."=ges/drawbacks you experienced in the
workplace."
position and/or
The finalpart isstudent responses to the questions "Would you consider returning to your current employer for
not?"
another co-op or a fulltime position?", "Why or Why and thequestion "Was the job description
explain."
accurate?", "If not, please
Ifyou have any questions about the information provided, please contact your co-op advisor.
Compi|cd August 2018 by the Stéiñbrig|1tCareer Develo pment Center
2
FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2022 05:30 PM INDEX NO. 601516/2019
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 73 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2022
II.Employer Hiring History
201035-201045 Junior En neer
200935-200945 Junior Engineer
201215-201225 Junior Engineer
201535-201535 Junior En ineer
201035-201045 Junior Engineer
201315-201325 Junior En neer
201415-201425 Junior Engineer
201235-201245 Junior En"-sz
201215-201225 Junior Engineer
201135-201145 Junior En er
CGmpi|éd August 2018 by the Steinbright Career Devé|cpméñt Center 3
FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2022 05:30 PM INDEX NO. 601516/2019
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 73 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2022
Ill.Student Evaluation Results
A. Qualitative Evaluation Data
200915-200925 -Experience working alcñgside Architects, General Contractors, Engineers,
etc. O
-Experience with technical drawings and overall design for mechanics of
window operation.O
cecr·-
-Developed -a+½n, interpersonal, and management skills.O
200935-200945 Assist the en neer to draw die drawin for commercial projects.
201635-201645 Junior engineer heavily involved in the wiñdow crüfsetwing process. Tasks
included but we're not limited to cutting :!rks bars, assembling frames,
installingglass, hardware and packaging windows. Other duties included day
to day maintainance of the workshop. O
O
Office duties included writing proposals for desired contracts, analyzing
arcMtectural blue prints and cad drawings, ordering materials, answering
phone calls,searching for contracts,creating excel spreadsheets
201515-201525 I was a junior engineer that dealt with making new window designs and made
new window frame pieces for current projects. I alsomade proposals for
potential projects and made a guide for new co-op students.
Compiléd August 2018 by the Steinbright Career Dévé|üpméñt Center
FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2022 05:30 PM INDEX NO. 601516/2019
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 73 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2022
III.Student Evaluation Results
A. Qualitative Evaluation Data
201135-201145 Reviewed architectural drawings and constructed take-offsO
Improved design of window extrusions using AutoCADD
Cerr2:ated with construction mañagers and architectsconcerning
projects D
Worked with CNC machines to construct wiñdow componentsO
Utilized 3D CAD to design window sash lift
201315-201325 Project Engineer
201515-201525 Worked closely with Engineers, Architects, and Contractors in development o
design and production O
Attêñded project meetings with Architect and Contractor to discuss and
address project statusO
s'--
Performed sitevisits to survey spaces and assistin construction -raticñ
phase
201115-201125 -Made take-offs and proposals for the company to bid on a project. O
-Worked in Autocad to design new wiñdow designs for the companyO
-Com- icated with other companies about processes
bidding
201115-201125 Cc==micated daily with architectsand engineers.0
Worked on the job sitecollecting data and measurements.O
Completed material orders as necessary.0
Bid on jobs up to 3 million dollars.
.
Compi|éd August 2018 by the StE|ñbrig|it Career Devé|üpmént Center 5
FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2022 05:30 PM INDEX NO. 601516/2019
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 73 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2022
III.Student Evaluation Results
A. Qualitative Evaluation Data
201735-201735 In charge of org=ai--+4an of office workspace, utilized AutoCAD to design
windsw details for multiple projects, designed company's window catalogue
and the drld..2 die catalogue.
Compiled August 2018 by the Steinbright Career DEVE|üpmeñt Center 6
FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2022 05:30 PM INDEX NO. 601516/2019
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 73 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2022
Ill.Student Evaluation Results
A. Qualitative Evaluation Data
200915-200925 Extremely challenging, I was able to accemplish tasks I was unsure I was
capable of completing. Great experience with overall project development, i.e.
ime&ame, how to handle issues, ways to c-rrricate in a business manner.
200935-20094 The job is interesting .The empicycr isstrictbut nice
201635-201645 illing to over overtime. Very hands on in the dng process with the
option to work in the office as well.Boss and other supervisors are down to
earth as itis a small compey. No dress code.
201515-201525 Getting the chance to work with machine-y that I have never heard of before
and wheñever I needed help, Richard would assistme as much as he could
respe·
201135-201145 I held a large amoüñt of ±!!!'y in the compañy as a whole. This was
due tothe smaller size of the firm as well as the variety of tasks completed. I
gained a huge amount of knowledge in the fieldand faced challeges I will
most likely face in the future. Employer was accom-edating and allowed a lot
of freedom in the work place.
201315-201325 When taking thisjob itwas statedduring the interview that candidates would
ally be taking the reigns of the company and basically rüññiñg it.This was
my partner and Iwere basically President, VP, Eñgiñeer, Secretary, ETC.
in a 6 month span of time. This would be the best feature of the job.
201515-201525 During the interview process my current employer made itvery clear coops
would have little
supervision and be expected to do professional levelwork.
The freedom that you get as a student learning and being put on the spot to
perform your best isprobably the greatest feature offered here.
Compi|éd August 2018 by the Sté|iérig|it Career Development Center 7
FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2022 05:30 PM INDEX NO. 601516/2019
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 73 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2022
Ill.Student Evaluation Results
A. Qualitative Evaluation Data
201115-201125 The best features of my positionwas being exposed to different parts of the
construction business and seeing the process of how a company gets a projed.
201115-201125 All the work assigned needed to get finished in a timely mmner and the way
in which the atmosphere was setup allowed for individual growth and
understanding of the industry. Employer was aliGwing for every aspect to be
seen by the co-ops.
201735-201735 I was given introduction to some of the complex machines.
Ccmpi|éd August 2018 by the Steinbright Career DEvé|cpment Center 8
FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2022 05:30 PM INDEX NO. 601516/2019
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 73 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2022
lil.Student Evaluation Results
A. Qualitative Evaluation Data
Student . Describe any chalfettges/tirawbacks you experienced in the position and/or
\\ ork I erms
ID workplace:
201635-201645 The work atthe workshop isphysical and can be stressful at times when trying to
meet deadliñes. But itwas through my own freewill that I chose to work there
instead of the office.
201515-201525 The first4-11=ge was getting to know the vocabulary used inthe wiñdaw
business. The second challenge was figuriñg out how to make a proposal for this
kind of business since thiswas my firsttime ever making a project proposal for a
window company.
There were times when guidance from the employer was low and goals were not
described adequately. This led to time wasted on projects that were not
completed correctly.
201315-201325 The eñvir==nt was "-- and organization. Let'sjust
working lacking say
ifyour a neat freak this coop is sure toleave you inebriated after the firstday.
Compi|cd August 2018 by the Steinbright Career Development Center 9
FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2022 05:30 PM INDEX NO. 601516/2019
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 73 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2022
Ill.Student Evaluation Results
A. Qualitative Evaluation Data
201515-201525 The place of business is both an office in the basement of the awñers house and
also a shop approximately a mile away from the office. The two locations for
completing work occasioñally leads to challenges.
201115-201125
One of the tools commeMy used on this job was Autocad which I had never
learnt before. I wish there had been a course at Drexel to teach Civil Engineering
majors Autocad in Freshman year. I stilllearnthow to use it,but I think
everything could have gone much fasterifI had more experience with it.
201115-201125 Itwas a great positicñ to hold, but there was not much guidence as to how the
work should be completed. Resulted in many redos.
201735-201735 The work eñvir==+ was not and most of the itfeltlike there is
friendly times,
no manager. Censeqüêñtly, itwas difficultto stay motivated and driven
throughout my job tenure.
Compi!éd August 2018 by the Steinbright Career Dévé|üpment Center 10
FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2022 05:30 PM INDEX NO. 601516/2019
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 73 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2022
III.Student Evaluation Results
A. Qualitative Evaluation Data
80% of students described their job description as accurate.
Throughout the whole co-op, i didno work auto-cad work on veiñdews, and did no
5-
work iñvGMñg windows at all.They had me working on personal finance material
201325
and itwas nothing likethe job description
While itis truethat I did conduct most of the work stated in the Job Description, the
description neglected to mention thatI was going to also be a secretary that
screened calls,cleaned up the office every so often, and filed away theirbills that
weren't for the company. The description also neglected to mention that I was to
201215. write petitions stating the Window Iñdustry iscorrupt when the President did not
"alone"
201225 get a job he wanted. In addition, I was not aware I would be working for
about a month while the other co-op was writing meaningless petitions, Freedom of
Information Law requests, and work on selling things for the President on E-Bay.
20% of students said they would consider returning to Jaidan for another co-op or a fulltime position.
201035- I am familiar with the work and I know the goals of the cuupany.
cñvircñment,
201045
201635- I would liketo experiences
diversify my
201645
201515- I have found that thismight not be what I want to do in the future. this
However,
201525 has given me a good point in the direction I want to go in.
Coimpi|ëd August 2018 by the Steinbright Career Devé|üpment Center
FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2022 05:30 PM INDEX NO. 601516/2019
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 73 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2022
Ill.Student Evaluation Results
A. Qualitative Evaluation Data
201135- While I gained valuable experience in the field the work I completed
engineering
201145 was geared more around architectural engineering. Being a mechanical cagiñécring
major I fmd itwould be more beneficial to pursue a position with an employer who
focuses more on the mechanical aspect of engineering.
201315- The istoo small and I feel like I'vesurpassed it's curve
company learning doing
201325 most of the daily assignments within.
201515- I feelienjoyed time at coop. I learned alotand enjoyed with
Yes, my my working
201525 those around me in the company.
201115- Even though this was relevantto career objective, itwas not relevant
coop my
201125 êñ0ügh for me toreturn aftergradu.ating from Drexel. Jaidan Industries isa wiñdow
===^cti3riñg company and this isnot the exact field I would liketo pursue once I
graduate.
201115- The work isnot well guided and would require much more cr-'-nt to an
201125 industry that I am not completely interested in.
201735- Because I am for a co-op more related to major since that isthe
looking closely my
201735 entire purpose of the co-op program.
Compiled August 2018 by the Steiübright Career Development Center L2
Preview
FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2022 05:30 PM INDEX NO. 601516/2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 73 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2022 DR E X E L U N I V ER S I T Y Steinbright Career Development Center Employer DataRequestfor Jaidan Industries I. UnderstandingYourReport..........................................................................2 II. EmployerHiringHistory............ .............. .................... .3 III.StudentEvaluationResults...........................................................................4 A. Qualitative Evaluation Data ............................. ........ ....... 5 1. Question: Describe your co-op position as you would on your resume 5 2. Question: Describe challenges/drawbacks you experienced in the position and/or workplace. .. .... 6 3. Qüésties: Describe the best features of your position and employer 5 4. Questicñ: Would you consider returning to your co-op employer. 7 5. Question: Based on your experience, the provided job description was accurate........................... 9 Compiled August 2018 by the Steinbright Career Devs|üpment Center 1 EXHIBIT FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2022 05:30 PM INDEX NO. 601516/2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 73 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2022 I. Understanding Your Report Below, you will find the requested inform±inn for Jaidan Industries and theirparticipation in the Drexel Co- op Program. Student evaluaticñ data is focused on the spring/:=nmer 2010-2011 co-op cycle through the spring/summer 2017-2018 co-op cycle. Enrployer Hiring History This sectionmmm-izes the hiring history ofJaidan Industries from spring/ er 2010-2011 co-op cycle threügh the spring/summer 2017-2018 co-op cycle. Itincludes the sesdemic year, job title,and student's name. Student Evsination Results The Student Evaluation Results isthe compilation of c d-.dans completed by 5tudents employed by Jaidan Industries at theconclusion of each co-op cycle. Qualitative Results The qualitative resultsfor the student evaluations are divided into four parts. resume." The firstpartisstudent responses to the question "Describe your co-op position as you would on your employer." The second partisstudent responses to the question "Describe the best featuresof your pesi'ien and The thirdpart isstudent responses to the question "Describe any chr."=ges/drawbacks you experienced in the workplace." position and/or The finalpart isstudent responses to the questions "Would you consider returning to your current employer for not?" another co-op or a fulltime position?", "Why or Why and thequestion "Was the job description explain." accurate?", "If not, please Ifyou have any questions about the information provided, please contact your co-op advisor. Compi|cd August 2018 by the Stéiñbrig|1tCareer Develo pment Center 2 FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2022 05:30 PM INDEX NO. 601516/2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 73 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2022 II.Employer Hiring History 201035-201045 Junior En neer 200935-200945 Junior Engineer 201215-201225 Junior Engineer 201535-201535 Junior En ineer 201035-201045 Junior Engineer 201315-201325 Junior En neer 201415-201425 Junior Engineer 201235-201245 Junior En"-sz 201215-201225 Junior Engineer 201135-201145 Junior En er CGmpi|éd August 2018 by the Steinbright Career Devé|cpméñt Center 3 FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2022 05:30 PM INDEX NO. 601516/2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 73 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2022 Ill.Student Evaluation Results A. Qualitative Evaluation Data 200915-200925 -Experience working alcñgside Architects, General Contractors, Engineers, etc. O -Experience with technical drawings and overall design for mechanics of window operation.O cecr·- -Developed -a+½n, interpersonal, and management skills.O 200935-200945 Assist the en neer to draw die drawin for commercial projects. 201635-201645 Junior engineer heavily involved in the wiñdow crüfsetwing process. Tasks included but we're not limited to cutting :!rks bars, assembling frames, installingglass, hardware and packaging windows. Other duties included day to day maintainance of the workshop. O O Office duties included writing proposals for desired contracts, analyzing arcMtectural blue prints and cad drawings, ordering materials, answering phone calls,searching for contracts,creating excel spreadsheets 201515-201525 I was a junior engineer that dealt with making new window designs and made new window frame pieces for current projects. I alsomade proposals for potential projects and made a guide for new co-op students. Compiléd August 2018 by the Steinbright Career Dévé|üpméñt Center FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2022 05:30 PM INDEX NO. 601516/2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 73 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2022 III.Student Evaluation Results A. Qualitative Evaluation Data 201135-201145 Reviewed architectural drawings and constructed take-offsO Improved design of window extrusions using AutoCADD Cerr2:ated with construction mañagers and architectsconcerning projects D Worked with CNC machines to construct wiñdow componentsO Utilized 3D CAD to design window sash lift 201315-201325 Project Engineer 201515-201525 Worked closely with Engineers, Architects, and Contractors in development o design and production O Attêñded project meetings with Architect and Contractor to discuss and address project statusO s'-- Performed sitevisits to survey spaces and assistin construction -raticñ phase 201115-201125 -Made take-offs and proposals for the company to bid on a project. O -Worked in Autocad to design new wiñdow designs for the companyO -Com- icated with other companies about processes bidding 201115-201125 Cc==micated daily with architectsand engineers.0 Worked on the job sitecollecting data and measurements.O Completed material orders as necessary.0 Bid on jobs up to 3 million dollars. . Compi|éd August 2018 by the StE|ñbrig|it Career Devé|üpmént Center 5 FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2022 05:30 PM INDEX NO. 601516/2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 73 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2022 III.Student Evaluation Results A. Qualitative Evaluation Data 201735-201735 In charge of org=ai--+4an of office workspace, utilized AutoCAD to design windsw details for multiple projects, designed company's window catalogue and the drld..2 die catalogue. Compiled August 2018 by the Steinbright Career DEVE|üpmeñt Center 6 FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2022 05:30 PM INDEX NO. 601516/2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 73 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2022 Ill.Student Evaluation Results A. Qualitative Evaluation Data 200915-200925 Extremely challenging, I was able to accemplish tasks I was unsure I was capable of completing. Great experience with overall project development, i.e. ime&ame, how to handle issues, ways to c-rrricate in a business manner. 200935-20094 The job is interesting .The empicycr isstrictbut nice 201635-201645 illing to over overtime. Very hands on in the dng process with the option to work in the office as well.Boss and other supervisors are down to earth as itis a small compey. No dress code. 201515-201525 Getting the chance to work with machine-y that I have never heard of before and wheñever I needed help, Richard would assistme as much as he could respe· 201135-201145 I held a large amoüñt of ±!!!'y in the compañy as a whole. This was due tothe smaller size of the firm as well as the variety of tasks completed. I gained a huge amount of knowledge in the fieldand faced challeges I will most likely face in the future. Employer was accom-edating and allowed a lot of freedom in the work place. 201315-201325 When taking thisjob itwas statedduring the interview that candidates would ally be taking the reigns of the company and basically rüññiñg it.This was my partner and Iwere basically President, VP, Eñgiñeer, Secretary, ETC. in a 6 month span of time. This would be the best feature of the job. 201515-201525 During the interview process my current employer made itvery clear coops would have little supervision and be expected to do professional levelwork. The freedom that you get as a student learning and being put on the spot to perform your best isprobably the greatest feature offered here. Compi|éd August 2018 by the Sté|iérig|it Career Development Center 7 FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2022 05:30 PM INDEX NO. 601516/2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 73 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2022 Ill.Student Evaluation Results A. Qualitative Evaluation Data 201115-201125 The best features of my positionwas being exposed to different parts of the construction business and seeing the process of how a company gets a projed. 201115-201125 All the work assigned needed to get finished in a timely mmner and the way in which the atmosphere was setup allowed for individual growth and understanding of the industry. Employer was aliGwing for every aspect to be seen by the co-ops. 201735-201735 I was given introduction to some of the complex machines. Ccmpi|éd August 2018 by the Steinbright Career DEvé|cpment Center 8 FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2022 05:30 PM INDEX NO. 601516/2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 73 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2022 lil.Student Evaluation Results A. Qualitative Evaluation Data Student . Describe any chalfettges/tirawbacks you experienced in the position and/or \\ ork I erms ID workplace: 201635-201645 The work atthe workshop isphysical and can be stressful at times when trying to meet deadliñes. But itwas through my own freewill that I chose to work there instead of the office. 201515-201525 The first4-11=ge was getting to know the vocabulary used inthe wiñdaw business. The second challenge was figuriñg out how to make a proposal for this kind of business since thiswas my firsttime ever making a project proposal for a window company. There were times when guidance from the employer was low and goals were not described adequately. This led to time wasted on projects that were not completed correctly. 201315-201325 The eñvir==nt was "-- and organization. Let'sjust working lacking say ifyour a neat freak this coop is sure toleave you inebriated after the firstday. Compi|cd August 2018 by the Steinbright Career Development Center 9 FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2022 05:30 PM INDEX NO. 601516/2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 73 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2022 Ill.Student Evaluation Results A. Qualitative Evaluation Data 201515-201525 The place of business is both an office in the basement of the awñers house and also a shop approximately a mile away from the office. The two locations for completing work occasioñally leads to challenges. 201115-201125 One of the tools commeMy used on this job was Autocad which I had never learnt before. I wish there had been a course at Drexel to teach Civil Engineering majors Autocad in Freshman year. I stilllearnthow to use it,but I think everything could have gone much fasterifI had more experience with it. 201115-201125 Itwas a great positicñ to hold, but there was not much guidence as to how the work should be completed. Resulted in many redos. 201735-201735 The work eñvir==+ was not and most of the itfeltlike there is friendly times, no manager. Censeqüêñtly, itwas difficultto stay motivated and driven throughout my job tenure. Compi!éd August 2018 by the Steinbright Career Dévé|üpment Center 10 FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2022 05:30 PM INDEX NO. 601516/2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 73 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2022 III.Student Evaluation Results A. Qualitative Evaluation Data 80% of students described their job description as accurate. Throughout the whole co-op, i didno work auto-cad work on veiñdews, and did no 5- work iñvGMñg windows at all.They had me working on personal finance material 201325 and itwas nothing likethe job description While itis truethat I did conduct most of the work stated in the Job Description, the description neglected to mention thatI was going to also be a secretary that screened calls,cleaned up the office every so often, and filed away theirbills that weren't for the company. The description also neglected to mention that I was to 201215. write petitions stating the Window Iñdustry iscorrupt when the President did not "alone" 201225 get a job he wanted. In addition, I was not aware I would be working for about a month while the other co-op was writing meaningless petitions, Freedom of Information Law requests, and work on selling things for the President on E-Bay. 20% of students said they would consider returning to Jaidan for another co-op or a fulltime position. 201035- I am familiar with the work and I know the goals of the cuupany. cñvircñment, 201045 201635- I would liketo experiences diversify my 201645 201515- I have found that thismight not be what I want to do in the future. this However, 201525 has given me a good point in the direction I want to go in. Coimpi|ëd August 2018 by the Steinbright Career Devé|üpment Center FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2022 05:30 PM INDEX NO. 601516/2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 73 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2022 Ill.Student Evaluation Results A. Qualitative Evaluation Data 201135- While I gained valuable experience in the field the work I completed engineering 201145 was geared more around architectural engineering. Being a mechanical cagiñécring major I fmd itwould be more beneficial to pursue a position with an employer who focuses more on the mechanical aspect of engineering. 201315- The istoo small and I feel like I'vesurpassed it's curve company learning doing 201325 most of the daily assignments within. 201515- I feelienjoyed time at coop. I learned alotand enjoyed with Yes, my my working 201525 those around me in the company. 201115- Even though this was relevantto career objective, itwas not relevant coop my 201125 êñ0ügh for me toreturn aftergradu.ating from Drexel. Jaidan Industries isa wiñdow ===^cti3riñg company and this isnot the exact field I would liketo pursue once I graduate. 201115- The work isnot well guided and would require much more cr-'-nt to an 201125 industry that I am not completely interested in. 201735- Because I am for a co-op more related to major since that isthe looking closely my 201735 entire purpose of the co-op program. Compiled August 2018 by the Steiübright Career Development Center L2