Exhibit,Appendix: Street Snacks Llc v. Bridge Associates Of Soho, Inc., Adam D. Luckner, Midway Holdings Corp., York Resources Llc, Sterling National Bank, New York State District Attorney, State Of New York, City Of New York, New York City Environmental Control Board, New York City Department Of Finance

On August 12, 2021 a Exhibit,Appendix was filed involving a dispute between Street Snacks Llc, and Adam D. Luckner, Bridge Associates Of Soho, Inc., City Of New York, John Does, Numbered 1 Through 25, Midway Holdings Corp., New York City Department Of Finance, New York City Environmental Control Board, New York State District Attorney, State Of New York, Sterling National Bank, York Resources Llc, for Commercial - Other (Foreclosure) in the District Court of New York County.

Preview
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/17/2022 04:03 PM INDEX NO. 602374/2009
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 132 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/17/2022

EXHIBIT D
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/17/2022 04:03 PM INDEX NO. 602374/2009
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 132 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/17/2022

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------------------------------------X
STREET SNACKS, LLC,
Index No: 602374/09
Plaintiff,
AFFIRMATION
-against- IN OPPOSITION
OF AMY D.
BRIDGE ASSOCIATES OF SOHO, INC., CARLIN
ADAM D. LUCKNER, MIDWAY HOLDINGS CORP.,
YORK RESOURCES LLC, STERLING NATIONAL
BANK, NEW YORK STATE DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ORAL ARGUMENT
STATE OF NEW YORK, CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW REQUESTED
YORK CITY ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD,
NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
and “JOHN DOES, Numbered 1 through 25,” the names
of the last twenty-five named defendants being fictitious,
real names unknown to plaintiff, the parties intended being
tenants or persons or corporations having an interest in as
tenants or persons in possession of portions of the mortgaged
premises,

Defendants.
------------------------------------------------------------------X

AMY D. CARLIN, an attorney duly admitted to practice law before the courts

and the State of New York, hereby affirms under penalty of perjury as follows:

1. I am a member of LaRocca Hornik Rosen Greenberg & Blaha LLP,

attorneys for plaintiff Street Snacks, LLC (“Street Snacks”). As such I am personally

familiar with the facts and circumstances stated herein. I make this affirmation in

opposition to the motion of defendants Bridge Associates of Soho, Inc. (“Bridge

Associates”) and Adam Luckner (hereinafter Bridge Associates and Adam D. Luckner

are collectively referred to as “Defendants”) to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR

3215(c).
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/17/2022 04:03 PM INDEX NO. 602374/2009
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 132 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/17/2022

2. The evidence demonstrates that Street Snacks has not abandoned this

action to foreclose a commercial mortgage. From the outset, Bridge Associates and

Street Snacks sought to settle this lawsuit and reaching a global settlement would not

have been possible without holding the prosecution of this action in abeyance. In that

regard, Defendants are aware that Street Snacks has no intention of abandoning its claims

for repayment of the subject loan or this lawsuit.

3. On or about August 17, 2009, Street Snacks served the Complaint upon

Defendants. Shortly after being served, I received a telephone call from Alan Luckner

(“Alan”). Alan informed me that he was Adam Luckner’s father and an authorized

representative of Defendants. Alan is a sophisticated businessman with experience

developing and managing multi-family and mixed use properties in New York.

4. Alan advised me that Defendants were interested in exploring a possible

settlement of the lawsuit. He gave me his brief account of the subject loan’s history and

the primary property securing it, 533 Greenwich Street, New York, New York (the “NYC

Property”). Alan told me that he might be “looking to get out” of the NYC Property and

requested that my client and I meet with him and Robert Friedman, the principal of York

Resources LLC (“York”), to discuss possible settlement options. York is the holder of a

lien (the “York Mortgage”) on the NYC Property that is subordinate to Street Snacks’ lien.

5. On or about September 15, 2009, Thomas Makkos and I met with Alan

and Robert Friedman. Mr. Friedman is a lawyer and a well-established real estate

developer whose affiliated entities have substantial real estate holdings in New York. Alan

advised us that Mr. Friedman was also his close personal friend and that Bridge Associates

owed Mr. Friedman’s company approximately $700,000 in connection with the York

2
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/17/2022 04:03 PM INDEX NO. 602374/2009
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 132 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/17/2022

Mortgage.

6. During the meeting, we discussed Street Snacks’ Note, the condition of

the NYC Property, and the obstacles Alan had experienced in dealing with the long-term

residents (the “Statutory Tenants”) who were on rent strike since 1990. Although we did

not discuss the material terms of a settlement at that initial meeting, the parties agreed to

continue to pursue the possibility of a settlement.

7. Following the meeting, I had numerous telephone conversations with Alan

concerning the NYC Property and the parameters for settlement. 1 Alan also requested

that Street Snacks extend Defendants’ time to answer or move in response to the

Complaint. Alan instructed me to send the letter confirming the extension to him by way

of an e-mail addressed to Allysa Nguyen, his daughter-in-law (and, upon information and

belief, Adam Luckner’s wife). See the letter with transmittal e-mail annexed hereto as

Exhibit A extending Defendants’ time to answer to October 29, 2009.

8. The settlement discussions culminated with Alan proposing to transfer the

NYC Property to Street Snacks through a deed in lieu of foreclosure. On or about

October 21, 2009, Alan confirmed the terms for the potential settlement, which included

(a) Bridge Associates transferring the NYC Property to Street Snacks through a deed in

lieu of foreclosure; (b) Street Snacks releasing Bridge Associates and the guarantors from

any liability for a deficiency; (c) York releasing and/or assigning the York Mortgage to

Street Snacks in exchange for Street Snacks’ installment payments of certain

consideration; (e) Street Snacks releasing its lien on the Woodmere Property and Long

Island Property; and (f) Street Snacks paying the closing costs for the transaction,

1
From the outset, Alan elected to take an informal approach to the lawsuit and settlement discussions,
handling the negotiations personally rather than retaining a lawyer.

3
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/17/2022 04:03 PM INDEX NO. 602374/2009
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 132 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/17/2022

including the real estate transfer taxes and recording costs. The proposed terms were

subject York’s approval and any issues or conditions that arose during Street Snacks’ due

diligence and preparation for the closing of the transaction.

9. As a result of the ongoing settlement discussions, Street Snacks extended

Defendants’ time to respond to the Complaint to November 30, 2009. See the letter dated

October 23, 2009 with transmittal e-mail, annexed hereto as Exhibit B.

10. Initially, York demanded that Street Snacks provide York with security for

the installment payments in the form of a self-liquidating mortgage to be recorded against

the NYC Property. Street Snacks rejected York’s demand. After further negotiations,

Alan advised me that Robert Friedman agreed to accept the personal guaranties of Street

Snacks’ members as security for the payments.

11. With the terms of a settlement agreed to in principal, Street Snacks

undertook its due diligence and preparations for closing the transaction, including

investigating the conditions at the NYC Property, the scope of work and costs of repairs

to make the building code compliant, and curing any conditions that would prevent Street

Snacks from obtaining clear title to the property. I had numerous telephone conversations

with Alan concerning the many issues that had to be addressed prior to and/or at closing.

12. In that regard, the title report prepared in advance of the closing of the

transaction indicated that judgments totaling on excess of $26,000 and Environmental

Control Board violations totaling in excess of $50,000 were recorded against the NYC

Property. The title report also noted a recorded lease from 1977, a mortgage from 1962,

a mortgage from 1963, a mortgage from 1977, and a mortgage from 1985 that would

have to be resolved prior to closing. See the excerpts from the title report annexed hereto

4
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/17/2022 04:03 PM INDEX NO. 602374/2009
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 132 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/17/2022

as Exhibit C.

13. In order to calculate the total consideration for purposes of paying the real

estate transfer taxes for the transaction, Street Snacks retained Michael Darling of Realty

Check, Inc. to appraise the NYC Property. The preliminary drafts of the appraisal did not

properly address the complicated circumstances surrounding the NYC Property that

would substantially impact its value. In that regard, Alan provided Mr. Darling with

certain information concerning the history of the building and his dealings with the

Statutory Tenants. See my e-mail to Allysa Nguyen dated June 25, 2010 advising Alan

that the appraiser would be contacting him, annexed hereto as Exhibit D.

14. Although Mr. Darling was retained in or about June 2010, the appraisal

was not finalized until almost one year later. See Mr. Darling’s transmittal e-mail to me

dated May 11, 2011, annexed hereto as Exhibit E.

15. As a result of Street Snacks’ increasing closing costs and the risks

associated with renovating, maintaining, and operating the NYC Property, it was agreed

that the consideration that Street Snacks was to pay to York would be reduced.

16. Because the closing of the transaction was still pending, rather than

continue to provide Defendants brief extensions of time to respond to the Complaint,

Alan requested that Street Snacks extend Defendants’ time to respond indefinitely. See

the letters with transmittal e-mails extending Defendants’ time to answer, annexed hereto

collectively as Exhibit F.

17. On September 14, 2011, Street Snacks extended Defendants’ time to

answer or move with respect to the Complaint “to a date that is twenty (20) days from the

date of service of a written demand for same.” See my letter with the transmittal e-mail

5
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/17/2022 04:03 PM INDEX NO. 602374/2009
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 132 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/17/2022

thread, including Ms. Nguyen’s request that Defendants’ time to respond be expanded to

30 days upon demand, annexed hereto as Exhibit G.

18. Street Snacks further agreed that it would pay Bridge Associates an

amount toward the carrying costs of the NYC Property it was incurring while the

transaction was pending.

19. I continued to have regular telephone conversations with Alan discussing

the conditions at the NYC Property, the violations, the Statutory Tenants, the real estate

taxes and tax lien foreclosure action, and the transfer taxes that would be due at closing.

By way of example, see my e-mail to Alan dated November 20, 2012, annexed hereto as

Exhibit H.

20. In December 2012, I advised Alan that Street Snacks was prepared to

move forward to close the transaction for transferring the NYC Property with the deed in

lieu of foreclosure. See my follow-up e-mail to Brian Gallagher, Esq. dated December

17, 2012, annexed hereto as Exhibit I.2

21. Shortly thereafter, Alan contacted me directly to advise me that rather than

moving forward with the transaction to transfer the NYC Property to Street Snacks,

Bridge Associates intended to sell the NYC Property to a buyer and use the proceeds to

resolve, among other things, Street Snacks’ Note, real estate tax liens totaling over

$840,000, and the York Loan.

22. Alan told me that the transaction was dependent upon Bridge Associates

negotiating the purchase of all of the Statutory Tenants’ interests so that the buyer would

receive title to the vacant NYC Property. Although Street Snacks was prepared to close

2
Alan advised me that Mr. Gallagher, who regularly represented Robert Friedman in connection with his
companies’ real estate transactions, would be representing Bridge Associates at the closing.

6
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/17/2022 04:03 PM INDEX NO. 602374/2009
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 132 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/17/2022

the deed in lieu of foreclosure transaction, Alan demanded that the settlement be put on

hold and that he be given time to complete the sale of the NYC Property. Alan contended

that not only would it be in Street Snacks’ financial interest to forebear from prosecuting

this lawsuit until the sale was completed, but that if Street Snacks did not, Bridge

Associates would file for bankruptcy protection which would delay any resolution.

23. Under the circumstances, Street Snacks agreed to provide Bridge

Associates with time to complete the transaction and achieve a global settlement.

24. I remained in close telephone contact with Alan and Robert Friedman

during the spring of 2013, monitoring the progress of their contract negotiations with the

buyer. In that regard, Mr. Friedman represented Bridge Associates in the pending

transaction.

25. On July 2, 2013, Mr. Friedman informed me that the due diligence period

provided in the parties’ contract of sale for the NYC Property had expired and that the

buyer was moving forward with the transaction. See the letter from Robert Friedman to

me annexed hereto as Exhibit J. Bridge Associates’ next step was to begin negotiations

with the Statutory Tenants to arrive at an amount acceptable to all parties for the

Statutory Tenants to vacate and surrender their rights. If the parties could not come to

such an agreement, the buyer had the right to cancel the contract. In his letter, Mr.

Friedman asked me to “stay in contact so I may keep you advised as to the progress of

discussions with the tenants and a likelihood of closing.”

26. Mr. Friedman advised me during his periodic updates that because Bridge

Associates was negotiating with the Statutory Tenants as a group rather than with each

individual tenant directly, the discussions were progressing very slowly.

7
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/17/2022 04:03 PM INDEX NO. 602374/2009
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 132 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/17/2022

27. On September 4, 3013, Street Snacks provided Bridge Associates with an

itemization of the outstanding amounts due under the Note that would have to be

satisfactorily resolved as part of the global settlement. See my letter to Robert Friedman

dated September 4, 2013, annexed hereto as Exhibit K.

28. I remained in regular telephone contact with Mr. Friedman, generally

receiving bi-weekly updates on the status of his negotiations with the Statutory Tenants.

29. On April 2, 2014, Thomas Makkos and I met with Mr. Friedman to

discuss his negotiations with the Statutory Tenants and to also explore other possible

options for settling the amounts due from Bridge Associates to Street Snacks under the

Note. See the e-mail thread ending on March 29, 2014, annexed hereto as Exhibit L. At

the meeting, Mr. Friedman advised us that his negotiations with the Statutory Tenants

were on-going and that to date, nothing had arisen during his discussion with the

Statutory Tenants’ lawyer that would indicate that an agreement could not be reached.

30. Ultimately, Bridge Associates’ contract to sell the NYC Property to the

buyer terminated after Bridge Associates and the Statutory Tenants could not agree to a

purchase price for their interests. During a telephone conversation on or about September

8, 2014, Alan advised me that 50% of the Statutory Tenants demanded a higher purchase

price than Bridge Associates was able and/or willing to pay.

31. When I told Alan that Street Snacks was prepared to move forward with

the deed in lieu of foreclosure, he advised me that he had already taken steps to refinance

the liens on the NYC Property to enable Bridge Associates to develop the property with

the Statutory Tenants remaining in place. Alan represented that he was negotiating with

several private lenders interested in providing the necessary financing as joint venturers

8
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/17/2022 04:03 PM INDEX NO. 602374/2009
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 132 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/17/2022

for the development of the building.

32. Alan continued to provide me with frequent updates until March 11, 2015,

when he informed me that Bridge Associates had a commitment to refinance the liens on

the NYC Property. In preparation for the anticipated transaction, he requested that Street

Snacks issue an updated pay-off letter for the amounts due under its Note. See my letter

to Alan dated March 27, 2015, annexed hereto as Exhibit M.

33. On or about April 29, 2015, Alan advised me that he was completing the

necessary paperwork for a loan in the amount of approximately $6.5 million that would

resolve the lawsuit and Note, satisfy the real estate tax liens, resolve the York Mortgage,

and pre-pay one year of interest. He advised me that the closing of the transaction was

scheduled for June 6, 2015.

34. On May 19, 2015, when I contacted Alan to obtain an update on the

transaction, he confirmed that the closing was still scheduled for June 6th, pending receipt

of an appraisal of the NYC Property. During our conversation, Alan identified the lender

as Kennedy Funding, a large private lender specializing in bridge loans for commercial

properties, who was introduced to Alan by Eastern Consolidated. Alan claimed that he

had already invested $35,000 in closing costs for the transaction and that the only delay

was the completion of the lender’s appraisal.

35. Ultimately, Bridge Associates’ transaction with Kennedy Funding

terminated as a result of the valuation placed on the NYC Property by the lender’s

appraiser. On September 21, 2015, Alan advised me that he believed that the lender’s

appraisal was unreasonably low and did not accurately reflect the NYC Property’s real

value. Alan told me that he was already working on negotiating a new arrangement to

9
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/17/2022 04:03 PM INDEX NO. 602374/2009
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 132 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/17/2022

refinance the liens on the NYC Property with several interested private lenders

introduced to him by Adelaide Polsinelli of Eastern Consolidated and Rick Helfand of

Berko & Associates.

36. I attempted to contact Alan several times in late October 2015 seeking an

update on the proposed refinancing but I did not receive any response. Approximately

one week later, Defendants served the within motion.

37. The record established that after the lawsuit was filed and served, there

were constant communications between Street Snacks and Bridge Associates concerning

the settlement of this lawsuit, including the deed in lieu of foreclosure transaction, the

sale of the NYC Property, and the refinancing of the liens encumbering the NYC

Property. Each proposed settlement hinged on Street Snacks holding the prosecution of

this action in abeyance.

Defendants'
38. Street Snacks agreed to indefinitely extend time to answer the

Complaint in order to provide Defendants with the opportunity to resolve this matter.

Snacks'
Defendants are well aware that Street forbearance to pursue a judgment while

Defendants attempted to achieve a global settlement does not reflect any intention on the

part of Street Snacks to abandon this lawsuit or its claims for repayment of the subject

loan.

Defendants'
WHEREFORE, deponent respectfully requests that motion be denied

in itsentirety, and that Plaintiff be granted with such other and further relief as this Court

determines is just and proper.

Dated: New York, New York .. 7 c
December 21, 2015

AmÝ D. Carlin

10
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/17/2022 04:03 PM INDEX NO. 602374/2009
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 132 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/17/2022

EXHIBIT A
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/17/2022 04:03 PM INDEX NO. 602374/2009
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 132 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/17/2022

Amy Carlin

From: Allysa Nguyen

Sent: Wednesday, september 16, 2009 1:53 PM
To: Amy Carlin
Subject: RE: Street Snacks, LLC v. Bridge Associates Of 50h0, Inc., et at
Attachments: letter.pdf

Please see attached.

Allysa Nguyen
Sheldon May & Associates, P.C.
255 ~
Merrick Road RockvilleCentre, New York 11570
- ~
Telephone: (516) 763 3200 Facsimile:(516) 763 -3243
Telephone: - ~ 394 - 4245
Direct (516) 394 4244 Direct Facsimile: (516)

THIS MESSAGEIS INTENDEDONLYFORTHE USEOF THE RECIPIENTTO WHOM IT IS ADDRESSED,AND MAY CONTAIN fNFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED,
CONFIDENTIALAND EXEMPTFROM DISCLOSUREUNDERAPPLICABLELAW. IF THE READEROF THIS MESSAGEIS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT,OR THE EMPLOYEEOR
AGENT RESPONSIBLE FORDELIVERINGTHE MESSAGETO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT,YOU ARE HEREBYNOTIFIEDTHAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTIONOR
COPYINGOF THISCOMMUNICATION ISSTRICTLYPROHIBITED.IF YOU HAVE RECEIVEDTHISCOMMUNICATION IN ERROR,PLEASEDESTROYIT AND NOTIFY US
IMMEDIATELY BYTELEPHONEOR RETURNEMAIL.

Pursuant to IRSCircular 230, we hereby inform any U.S. federal tax advice set forth
you that herein was not intended
or written
by Sheldon May & Associates, P.C. to
may be imposed on you or any other person under the Internal
be used, and cannot be used, by you or any taxpayer, for the purpose of avoiding any penalties that
Revenue Code.

FNm: Amy Carlin [mailto:ACarlin@lhrgb.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 1:36 PM
To: Allysa Nguyen
Subject: Street Snacks, LLC v. Bridge Associates of SohD, Inc., et al.

Pursuant to his instructions, please forward the attached letterto Alan Luckner.
Thank you.

LAROCCA HORN1K ROSEN
GREENBERG BLAÑA LLP
coomiumr uw
Amy D. Carlin,Esq.
The Trump Building
40 Wall Street, 32nd Floor
New York, NY 10005
Tel.(212) 530-4835
Fax (212) 530-4815
Email: ACARLIN@LHRGB.Ç0M

Please,don'tprintif youdon'thaveto
________________-___________________
This e-mail, and any attachments hereto, isintended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain
legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient Of thise-mail, you are hereby
notified that any dissemination, distribution Or copying Of this e-mail, and any attachments hereto, isstrictlyprohibited. If
you have received this e-mail inerror, please immediately notifyme by reply e-mail and permanently delete the Original
and any copy of this e-mail and any printout thereof. Finally, while the company uses virus protection, the recipient should

1
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/17/2022 04:03 PM INDEX NO. 602374/2009
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 132 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/17/2022
check this email and any attachments forthe presence of viruses. The company accepts no liabilityfor any damage
caused by any virus transmitted by this email.

This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email

. .

2
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/17/2022 04:03 PM INDEX NO. 602374/2009
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 132 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/17/2022

LAROCCAH ORNIK ROSEN ÏG ifo u x
LAWR11NC)E
S.ROSEN
GREENBERG BLAHA LLP Ron cannao a
,, ERICl'liTER ELAMA
COUNSELORS AT LAW FLORENCLi
R. GOFIiMAN40
HERITAM.
BE/.A11 AMYD. CARUN A
65HARRISTOWNKOAD DAVID N. KtTTREDGEA
THE TRUM.PBUILDING 3M ROOK KARliNN. G RAYSON-RO
DGERSO
40 WALL STREET -4N 2 ERINK. DDRKE
o
32ND FlooR 2014M-3541
FAX PATRickT. MCPARTI.AN
Da
NI!W YORK, NY 100D5 ANDREWG. H EG'r
FmMD COMMONS MPLAN1EB.ANDIUiWS
212430--4823 S3S° H ANDRiiWM. POLLl!R4
212-530-481S FAX R¼¶
FRuHOLAN) OMB Jy
LMRGB.COM 73240M1% o or couNatAnomm
732-40%330
FAX o cmmmuMau MomAtIn ATTORNEY

DIRECT DJAL: 212.530.4835
FRAIL; ”Ç RLEERGB.COM

September 16, 2009

VIA EMAIL
allysa.nguyen@maylawfirm.com
Mr. Alan Luckner
619 Bridge Street

Woodmere, NY 11598

Re: Street Snacks, LLC v. Bridge Associates of Inc.
Soho,
Index No. 602374/09

Dear Mr. Luckner:

As you are aware, we represent plaintiff Street LLC in connection
Snacks, with the
referenced matter. This is to confirm that plaintiffhas agreed to to October
extend, 2, 2009, the
date by which defendants Bridge Associates of Adam D. Luckner
Soho, Inc., and Midway
Holdings Corp. must answer or move with respect to the Summons and Complaint.

Defendants hereby agree to waive any defenses have to service of the
they may
Complaint. Defendants further agree that a facsimile of thisletter shall be deemed to
copy have
the same force and effect as the original hereof.

Please arrange for the defendants to confirm that the isa correct statement
foregoing of
parties'
the agreement by having them sign thisletter in the spaces below and to
returning it us.

Very truly yours,

Amy D. Carlin

LMBWAmzkm1tr.9-3fAVAac
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/17/2022 04:03 PM INDEX NO. 602374/2009
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 132 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/17/2022

ACCEPTED AND AGREED:

BRIDGE ASSOCIATES OF SOHO, INC. ADAM D. LUCKNF,R

Title:

MIDWAY HOLDINGS CORP.

Title: ()x

LA1522L03VMtncr,lt.9-16.09Aac
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/17/2022 04:03 PM INDEX NO. 602374/2009
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 132 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/17/2022

EXHIBIT B
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/17/2022 04:03 PM INDEX NO. 602374/2009
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 132 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/17/2022

Amy Carlin

From: Allysa Nguyen

Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 10:36 AM
To: Amy Carlin
Subject: RE: Street Snacks LLC v. Bridge Associates of Soho, Inc.

Thanks!

. .
Allysa Nguyen
Sheldon May & AssociateS, P.C.
~
255 Merrick Road RockvilleCentre, New York 11570
- ~ -
Telephone: (516) 763 3200 Facsimile:(516) 763 3243
- ~ - 4245
Direct Telephone: (516) 394 4244 Direct FacSimile: (516) 394

THIS MESSAGEIS INTENDEDONLY FORTHE USEOF THE RECIPIENTTO WHOM IT IS ADDRESSED,AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PR1VlLEGED,
CONFIDENTIALAND EXEMPTFROM DISCLOSUREUNDERAPPuCABLELAW. IF THE READEROF THIS MESSAGEIS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT,OR THE EMPLOYEEOR
AGENT RESPONSlBLEFORDEUVERINGTHE MESSAGETO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT,YOU ARE HEREBYNOTlFIEDTHAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTIONOR
COPYINGOFTHIS COMMUNICATION ISSTRICTLYPROHIBITED.IF YOU HAVE RECEtVEDTHIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR,PLEASEDESTROYIT AND NOTIFYUS
IMMEDIATELY BYTELEPHONEOR RETURNEMAIL.

Pursuant to IRSCircular 230, we hereby inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice set forth
herein was not intended
or written
by Sheldon May & Associates, P.C.to
be used, and cannot be used, by you or any taxpayer, for the purpose of avoiding any penalties that may be imposed on you or any other
person under the Internal
Revenue Code.

From: Amy Carlin [mailto:ACarlin@ihrgb.com]
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 9:48 AM
To: Allysa Nguyen
Subject: Street Snacks LLC v. Bridge Associates of Soho, Inc.

Please forward the attached letter to Alan Luckner.

Thank you.

LARoccA H ORN1K ROS EN
G R£iiN t1ERG LAHA LLP
edthnon Ar aw
Amy D. Cadin, Esq.
The Trump Building
40 Wall Street, 32nd Floor
New York, NY 10005
Tel.(212) 530-4835
Fa x (212)530-4815
Email: ACARLIN(d)LHRGB.COM

Please,don'tprintif youdon'thaveto
__________.----._______________------
This e-mail, and any attachments hereto, isintended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain

legally privileged and/or confidential information. Ifyou are not the intended recipient of thise-mail, you are hereby
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of thise-mail, and any attachments hereto, is prohibited.
strictly If
you have received this e-mail inerror, please immediately notifyme by reply e-mail and permanently delete the original
and any copy of thise-mail and any printout thereof. Finally, while the company uses virus protection, the recipient should
check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no for
liability any damage
caused by any virus transmitted by thisemail

1
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/17/2022 04:03 PM INDEX NO. 602374/2009
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 132 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/17/2022

This email has been scanned the MessageLabs Email System.
by Security
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email

2
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/17/2022 04:03 PM INDEX NO. 602374/2009
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 132

Case Info

Judge

Francis A. Kahn Iii Track Judge’s New Case

Case No.

(Subscribe to View)

Document Filed Date

October 17, 2022

Case Filing Date

August 12, 2021

County

Parties

Adam D. Luckner Defendant
ANAKHU, JOY TOLULOPE Attorney for the Defendant
Bridge Associates of Soho, Inc. Defendant
CARLIN, AMY D Attorney for the Plaintiff
City of New York Defendant
John Does, numbered 1 through 25 Defendant
KAMRAN, PETER K Attorney for the Defendant
Midway Holdings Corp. Defendant
MIRRO, MICHELE Attorney for the Defendant
New York City Department of Finance Defendant
New York City Environmental Control Board Defendant
New York State District Attorney Defendant
State of New York Defendant
Sterling National Bank Defendant
Street Snacks LLC Plaintiff
York Resources LLC Defendant
THOMAS KLEINBERGER Attorneys for Defendants
THOMAS LAMBERT Attorney
HARRY KRITZER Attorney
ALLISON FURMAN Attorney
IVAN SERCHUK Attorney
JAMES ARMENAKIS Attorney
BRUCE WIENER Attorneys for Defendants
BRIAN GALLAGHER Attorneys for Defendants
DAVID FOSTER Attorneys for Defendants
ROBERT DRUMMOND Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ROBERT FRIEDMAN Attorney
AMY D'AGOSTINO Attorneys for Plaintiffs
KAMRAN KHAN Attorneys for Defendants

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Preview

Related Topics

Case Info

Parties