arrow left
arrow right
  • Jardan 520 Llc v. Bvs Acquisition Co. Llc, M&T Bank, 86th Street Lender LlpSpecial Proceedings - Other (Turnover of Assets) document preview
  • Jardan 520 Llc v. Bvs Acquisition Co. Llc, M&T Bank, 86th Street Lender LlpSpecial Proceedings - Other (Turnover of Assets) document preview
  • Jardan 520 Llc v. Bvs Acquisition Co. Llc, M&T Bank, 86th Street Lender LlpSpecial Proceedings - Other (Turnover of Assets) document preview
  • Jardan 520 Llc v. Bvs Acquisition Co. Llc, M&T Bank, 86th Street Lender LlpSpecial Proceedings - Other (Turnover of Assets) document preview
						
                                

Preview

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/10/2022 06:58 PM INDEX NO. 153512/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 27 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/10/2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK JARDAN 520, LLC, : : Motion Seq. No. 002 Petitioners, : - - against : Index No. 153512/2022 : BVS ACQUISITION CO. LLC; M&T BANK; and : 86th STREET LENDER LLP : AFFIRMATION OF DAVID : SOROKOFFINSUPPORTOF Respondents. : LIMITED OPPOSITION TO : MOTION FOR ADMISSION : PRO HAC VICE ---------------------------- X DAVID SOROKOFF, an attorney admitted to practice in the courts of this State, affirms pursuant to CPLR R 2106(a) and under the penalties of perjury that: 1. I am the Member of Law Office of David Sorokoff LLC, attorney of record for petitioner Jardan 520 LLC ("Petitioner"). I am familiar with the facts set forth herein and make this affirmation based on my personal knowledge and a review of the books and records available to me. 2. I submit this affidavit in support of Petitioner's Limited Opposition to Motion to Admit Pro Hac Vice. 86th 3. On Thursday, May 5, 2022, I spoke with one of the attorneys for Respondent ("86th Street Lender LLP Street"). I pointed out that the papers in support of the motion, including the affirmation and affidavit, asserted that the plaintiff sought to have Mr. Nagle admitted pro hac vice. I asked that the papers be corrected to properly identify the request as 86th coming from Respondent Street, so that it would not be necessary to object to the motion. 1 of 2 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/10/2022 06:58 PM INDEX NO. 153512/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 27 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/10/2022 4. As of the time of this filing the papers in support of the motion have not been corrected, requiring this limited objection to be filed. EXECUTED this 10th day of May, 2022. David Sorokoff 2 2 of 2