arrow left
arrow right
  • PERFORMING ARTS LLC, VS. KILLARNEY CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. et al OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS (OTHER TORT) document preview
  • PERFORMING ARTS LLC, VS. KILLARNEY CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. et al OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS (OTHER TORT) document preview
  • PERFORMING ARTS LLC, VS. KILLARNEY CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. et al OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS (OTHER TORT) document preview
  • PERFORMING ARTS LLC, VS. KILLARNEY CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. et al OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS (OTHER TORT) document preview
  • PERFORMING ARTS LLC, VS. KILLARNEY CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. et al OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS (OTHER TORT) document preview
  • PERFORMING ARTS LLC, VS. KILLARNEY CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. et al OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS (OTHER TORT) document preview 
						
                                
Preview

                                IOAN

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Apr-21-2011 9:27 am

Case Number: CGC-10-498405
Filing Date: Apr-21-2011 9:27
Juke Box: 001 Image: 03189439
ORDER

PERFORMING ARTS LLC, VS. KILLARNEY CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. et al

001003189439

Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

u

Z~ 12

235 4
BRR

SEs 16
ge

7

18

19

20

21

2

23

24

25

26

27

28

MASHY/1063653/9532242v.1

DION N. COMINOS (SBN: 136522)
dcominos@gordonrees.com

MARK C. RUSSELL (SBN: 208865)
mrussell@gordonrees.com

OLIVIA B. NELSON (SBN: 253323)
obradbury@gordonrees.com
GORDON & REES LLP

275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 &
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 986-5900
Facsimile: (415) 986-8054

Attorneys for Defendant/Cross-Complainant/Cross-Defendant
CARDINAL CONSULTING, INC.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA - COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

PERFORMING ARTS, LLC, a Delaware

>ERFORMIN [DISCOVERY]
limited liability company,

)
) CASENO. CGC-10-498405
Plaintiff, )
) [PROB@SED] ORDER GRANTING
) CARDINAL’S AMENDED MOTION TO
vs. ) COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO
) FORM AND SPECIAL
) INTERROGATORIES; MOTION TO
KILLARNEY CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., ) COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH
MID-MARKET DEVELOPMENT CO., INC., ) REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF
CARDINAL CONSULTING, INC., ) DOCUMENTS
CULLINANE CONSTRUCTION, AL )
NORMAL MECHANICAL, INC., MICHAEL )
MURRAY, CONSTRUCTION TESTING )
SERVICES, and DOES 1 THROUGH 200, )
inclusive, )
)
)
)
)
)
)

Date: April 21, 2011
Time: 9:00 a.m.

Dept: 301

Judge: Hon. Peter J. Busch

Complaint Filed: April 7, 2010
Trial Date: Not set.

Defendants.

AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION(S).

The AMENDED motion of Defendant Cardinal Consulting, Inc. (“Cardinal”) for an order
compelling Plaintiff Performing Arts, LLC (“Plaintiff”) to provide further responses to its Form
Interrogatories and Special Interrogatories, Set One, and compelling compliance with its Request

for Production of Documents, Set One, came on for hearing on April 21, 2011, in Department

-l-

[RRQPOSBET ORDER GRANTING AMENDED MOTION TO COMPELGordon & Rees LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000

San Francisco, CA 94111

oC em ND HW FF YW N

woR YR YR NNN SE Be S GF FSH 2 Ss
Bee RES EE eS 2

301 of the captioned Court, the Honorable Peter J. Busch presiding. Olivia Nelson of Gordon &
Rees LLP appeared for Cardinal and Frear Stephen Schmid appeared for Plaintiff.

The Court, having considered the motion, the points and authorities, the declarations of
the parties, other pleadings on file, and having heard argument of counsel, and GOOD CAUSE
APPEARING, Orders as follows:

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that:

(a) Plaintiff shall provide further code compliant responses to Cardinal’s Form
Interrogatories, Set One, Interrogatories Nos. 7.1, 9.1, 9.2, 14.1 and 50.2, within ‘NO calendar Ca
days of execution of this Order;

(b) Plaintiff shall provide further code compliant responses to Cardinal’s Special
Interrogatories, Set One, Interrogatory Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 13, 14, 15, 34, 36, 39, 41, 42,
45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70,
71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 80, 81, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99,
100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111 and 112 within Seda days of 4
execution of this Order;

(c) Plaintiff shall produce all documents that it agreed to produce in response to each
category of documents set forth in Cardinal’s Request for Production of Documents, Set One,
including all attachments to the emails already produced, within T9 2 Pdar days of execution of re
this Order; and

(d) Plaintiff shall provide a Privilege Log identifying any and all documents withheld
on privilege grounds in response to Cardinal’s Request for Production of Documents, Set One, } 7b

2
within Q Pindar days of execution of this Order.

Dated: m ,2011 lee

Judge of the He rior Court

PETER J. BUSCH

-2-

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING AMENDED MOTION TO COMPEL