arrow left
arrow right
  • JOHNA PECOT et al VS. SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION, A et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • JOHNA PECOT et al VS. SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION, A et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • JOHNA PECOT et al VS. SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION, A et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • JOHNA PECOT et al VS. SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION, A et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • JOHNA PECOT et al VS. SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION, A et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • JOHNA PECOT et al VS. SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION, A et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
						
                                

Preview

27 28 | Lawrence D. Murray (SBN 77536) | MURRAY & ASSOCIATES 1781 Union Street ELECTRONICALLY San Francisco, CA 94123 FILED Tei: (415) 673-0555 Fax: (415) 928-4084 Superior Court of Cattfornia, | Attorney for Defendants: DAVID WONG, MICHAEL ZEHNER, Coun San aneee | BRIAN SAVAGE SHEDRICK McDANIELS, and the SAN 96/04/2015 FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF’S FOUNDATION BY:RONNIE OTERO Deputy Clerk SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO JOHNA PECOT, THOMAS ARATA, RICH Case No. CGC — 10 -501168 OWYANG, STEPHEN TILTON, JOSEPH LEAKE, and OSCAR TAYLOR, Individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION PURSUANT TO CODE OF CIVIL Plaintiffs, PROCEDURE SECTION 473 (d) TO v. CORRECT CLERICAL ERROR IN ORDER AFTER DEMURRER & SLAPP HEARING SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF’S ASSOCIATION, DAVID WONG, MICHAEL HEARING: JUNE 18, 2015 ZEHNER, BRIAN SAVAGE, TIME: 9:30 A.M. SHEDRICK McDANIELS, and the SAN DEPT: 302 FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF’S FOUNDATION et al., Defendants. To all parties and their attorneys of record: You and each of you please take notice that on June 18, 2015, at the hour of 9:30 a.m. of as soon thereafter as the matter can be hearing in Department 302 of the above entitled court located at 400 McAllister Street, San Francisco, Defendant David Wong will and hereby does move the court for the order of the court correcting the clerical error that caused the wrong order to be entered in this matter on the hearing of the Demurrer and SLAPP motion in direct contradiction to the order which was entered. Pecot, et al. vs. SFDSA, et al.; San Francisco Superior Court No: CGC — 10 — 501168 Pagel Notice of Motion Under CCP 473 (d) Mo To Correct Clerical Error In Order After Hearing27 28 This motion is made pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 473 (d) and on the based of all | moving and responding papers and declarations in this matter, declarations in this motion, the order which was entered and the transcript of the hearing before the Honorable Ernest H. Goldsmith, Judge of the Superior Court. Date: June 2, 2015 Respectfully submitted, MU. & ASSOC) AY INCE D. MURRAY Attotney for Defendant David Wong Pecct, et al. vs. SFDSA, et al.; San Francisco Superior Court No: CGC — 10 - 501168 Page 2 Notice of Motion Under CCP 473 (d) Mo To Correct Clerical Error In Order After HearingPROOF OF SERVICE 1 am employed in the City and County of San Francisco, State of California. I am over the age of| 18 and not a party to the within action. My business address is 1781 Union Street, San Francisco, California 94123; (415) 673-0555. On this date, I served the following document(s): NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION PURSUANT TO CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 473 (d) TO CORRECT CLERICAL ERROR IN ORDER AFTER DEMURRER & SLAPP HEARING on the interested parties in this action as follows: Attorney for Plaintiffs: Paul L. Kranz Law Office of Paul L. Kranz 499 14" Street, Suite 300 Oakland, CA 94516 Tel: (510) 839-1200 Fax: (510) 444-6698 Attorneys for Defendant San Francisco Deputy Sheriffs’ Association Lara Cullinane-Smith Shrem & Smith 11720 San Pablo Avenue #C Ei Cerrito, CA 94530 Tel: (S10) 919-3214 Fax: (510) 705-1854 lara@shremlaw.com [XX] [BY MAIL] _ I caused envelope(s) with postage thereon fully prepaid to be placed in the United| States mail at San Francisco, California, addressed as shown above. { yl [BY PERSONAL SERVICE BY EMAIL] _ I caused such envelope(s) to be delivered by hand to the above address(es). [xq [BY FAX] _ I caused the above entitled document(s) to be personally served on the above shown parties by facsimile transmission on the date shown below by confirming the fax phorie number with the law office shown above then (a) transmitting it via the fax machine within this office, and (b) receiving a receipt from the machine within this office confirming all documents sent were in fact properly received. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. Executed in San Francisco, California, on June 2, 2015. Pecot, et al. vs. SFDSA, et al.; San Francisco Superior Court No: CGC — 10 — 501168 Page3 Notice of Motion Under CCP 473 (d) Mo To Correct Clerical Error In Order After Hearing