On June 30, 2010 a
Hearing
was filed
involving a dispute between
Arata, Thomas,
Leake, Joseph,
Owyang, Rich,
Pecot, Johna,
Taylor, Oscar,
Tilton, Stephen,
and
Does 1-100,
Does 1 To 100,
Mcdaniels, Shedrick,
San Francisco Deputy Sheriff'S Association,
San Francisco Deputy Sheriff'S Association, A,
San Francisco Deputy Sheriff'S Foundation,
Savage, Brian,
Wong, David,
Zehner, Michael,
for civil
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
27
28
| Lawrence D. Murray (SBN 77536)
| MURRAY & ASSOCIATES
1781 Union Street ELECTRONICALLY
San Francisco, CA 94123 FILED
Tei: (415) 673-0555 Fax: (415) 928-4084 Superior Court of Cattfornia,
| Attorney for Defendants: DAVID WONG, MICHAEL ZEHNER, Coun San aneee
| BRIAN SAVAGE SHEDRICK McDANIELS, and the SAN 96/04/2015
FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF’S FOUNDATION BY:RONNIE OTERO
Deputy Clerk
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
JOHNA PECOT, THOMAS ARATA, RICH Case No. CGC — 10 -501168
OWYANG, STEPHEN TILTON, JOSEPH
LEAKE, and OSCAR TAYLOR, Individually
and on behalf of all other similarly situated, NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION
PURSUANT TO CODE OF CIVIL
Plaintiffs, PROCEDURE SECTION 473 (d) TO
v. CORRECT CLERICAL ERROR IN ORDER
AFTER DEMURRER & SLAPP HEARING
SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF’S
ASSOCIATION, DAVID WONG, MICHAEL HEARING: JUNE 18, 2015
ZEHNER, BRIAN SAVAGE, TIME: 9:30 A.M.
SHEDRICK McDANIELS, and the SAN DEPT: 302
FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF’S
FOUNDATION et al.,
Defendants.
To all parties and their attorneys of record:
You and each of you please take notice that on June 18, 2015, at the hour of 9:30 a.m. of as soon
thereafter as the matter can be hearing in Department 302 of the above entitled court located at 400
McAllister Street, San Francisco, Defendant David Wong will and hereby does move the court for the
order of the court correcting the clerical error that caused the wrong order to be entered in this matter on
the hearing of the Demurrer and SLAPP motion in direct contradiction to the order which was entered.
Pecot, et al. vs. SFDSA, et al.; San Francisco Superior Court No: CGC — 10 — 501168 Pagel
Notice of Motion Under CCP 473 (d) Mo To Correct Clerical Error In Order After Hearing27
28
This motion is made pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 473 (d) and on the based of all
| moving and responding papers and declarations in this matter, declarations in this motion, the order
which was entered and the transcript of the hearing before the Honorable Ernest H. Goldsmith, Judge of
the Superior Court.
Date: June 2, 2015 Respectfully submitted,
MU. & ASSOC)
AY INCE D. MURRAY
Attotney for Defendant David Wong
Pecct, et al. vs. SFDSA, et al.; San Francisco Superior Court No: CGC — 10 - 501168 Page 2
Notice of Motion Under CCP 473 (d) Mo To Correct Clerical Error In Order After HearingPROOF OF SERVICE
1 am employed in the City and County of San Francisco, State of California. I am over the age of|
18 and not a party to the within action. My business address is 1781 Union Street, San Francisco,
California 94123; (415) 673-0555. On this date, I served the following document(s): NOTICE OF
MOTION AND MOTION PURSUANT TO CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 473 (d)
TO CORRECT CLERICAL ERROR IN ORDER AFTER DEMURRER & SLAPP HEARING
on the interested parties in this action as follows:
Attorney for Plaintiffs:
Paul L. Kranz
Law Office of Paul L. Kranz
499 14" Street, Suite 300
Oakland, CA 94516
Tel: (510) 839-1200 Fax: (510) 444-6698
Attorneys for Defendant San Francisco Deputy Sheriffs’ Association
Lara Cullinane-Smith
Shrem & Smith
11720 San Pablo Avenue #C
Ei Cerrito, CA 94530
Tel: (S10) 919-3214 Fax: (510) 705-1854 lara@shremlaw.com
[XX] [BY MAIL] _ I caused envelope(s) with postage thereon fully prepaid to be placed in the United|
States mail at San Francisco, California, addressed as shown above.
{ yl [BY PERSONAL SERVICE BY EMAIL] _ I caused such envelope(s) to be delivered by hand
to the above address(es).
[xq [BY FAX] _ I caused the above entitled document(s) to be personally served on the above
shown parties by facsimile transmission on the date shown below by confirming the fax phorie number
with the law office shown above then (a) transmitting it via the fax machine within this office, and (b)
receiving a receipt from the machine within this office confirming all documents sent were in fact
properly received.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true
and correct. Executed in San Francisco, California, on June 2, 2015.
Pecot, et al. vs. SFDSA, et al.; San Francisco Superior Court No: CGC — 10 — 501168 Page3
Notice of Motion Under CCP 473 (d) Mo To Correct Clerical Error In Order After Hearing