On June 30, 2010 a
Stipulation,Agreement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Arata, Thomas,
Leake, Joseph,
Owyang, Rich,
Pecot, Johna,
Taylor, Oscar,
Tilton, Stephen,
and
Does 1-100,
Does 1 To 100,
Mcdaniels, Shedrick,
San Francisco Deputy Sheriff'S Association,
San Francisco Deputy Sheriff'S Association, A,
San Francisco Deputy Sheriff'S Foundation,
Savage, Brian,
Wong, David,
Zehner, Michael,
for civil
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Oct-16-2014 3:30 pm
Case Number: CGC-10-501168
Filing Date: Oct-16-2014 3:29
Filed by: JUDITH NUNEZ
Juke Box: 001 Image: 04657517
STIPULATION
JOHNA PECOT et al VS. SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION,
Aetal
001004657517
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.oOo rd DH WwW FF BW N
RN NW et
BNRRREBRPEE SRV F DESH ES
LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. KRANZ
PAUL L. KRANZ, ESQ., SBN 114999
499 14" Street, Suite 300
Oakland, CA 94612
kranzlaw@sbcglobal.net San Francisco County Superior Court
Telephone: (510) 839-1200 OCT 16 2014
Facsimile: (510) 444-6698 CLERK OF THE COURT
Attorneys for Named Plaintiffs Johna Pecot, et al., 8Y: path a ce
SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
JOHNA PECOT, et al. Individually and on Behalf of CASE NO. CGC-10-501168
All Others Similarly Situated,
: STIPULATION TO EXTEND
Plaintiffs, TIME
ve
SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF’S
ASSOCIATION, a California Nonprofit
Corporation, et al.
I SeSeeeees
Defendants.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiffs and Defendant San Francisco
Deputy Sheriffs’ Association, through their respective attorneys of record, as follows. Plaintiff
did not file opposition to the defendant's demurrer heard on September 4, 2014. The Court ruled
on the motion and issued an order dated September 26, 2014. There is a dispute between said
parties concerning the propriety of the matter having been heard on that day, i.e., whether the
parties had agreed to continue the hearing. The parties are currently trying to resolve this dispute,
and require additional time to do so. In order for them to do so, and therefore in the event the
parties are not able to resolve this dispute, the parties have agreed to extend the time until
November 6, 2014 for plaintiffs to seek relief by filing a C.C.P. § 473 motion, a motion for
-l-
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIMECo wenn nun F&F Ww Nn =
RN NY NY NY NN DN DN Bee ew ee ee i
oN A A FY NH —& SO we A DH BF WN SK SO
reconsideration, an ex parte application, or other motion, that would seek to vacate the Court's
September 26, 2014 order and that would afford plaintiffs the opportunity to file and have
opposition heard to the September 4, 2014 motion.
11
DATED: October] 5, 2014 LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. KRANZ
Yee (.
Document Filed Date
October 16, 2014
Case Filing Date
June 30, 2010
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Oct-16-2014 3:30 pm Case Number: CGC-10-501168 Filing Date: Oct-16-2014 3:29 Filed by: JUDITH NUNEZ Juke Box: 001 Image: 04657517 STIPULATION JOHNA PECOT et al VS. SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION, Aetal 001004657517 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.oOo rd DH WwW FF BW N RN NW et BNRRREBRPEE SRV F DESH ES LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. KRANZ PAUL L. KRANZ, ESQ., SBN 114999 499 14" Street, Suite 300 Oakland, CA 94612 kranzlaw@sbcglobal.net San Francisco County Superior Court Telephone: (510) 839-1200 OCT 16 2014 Facsimile: (510) 444-6698 CLERK OF THE COURT Attorneys for Named Plaintiffs Johna Pecot, et al., 8Y: path a ce SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO JOHNA PECOT, et al. Individually and on Behalf of CASE NO. CGC-10-501168 All Others Similarly Situated, : STIPULATION TO EXTEND Plaintiffs, TIME ve SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF’S ASSOCIATION, a California Nonprofit Corporation, et al. I SeSeeeees Defendants. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiffs and Defendant San Francisco Deputy Sheriffs’ Association, through their respective attorneys of record, as follows. Plaintiff did not file opposition to the defendant's demurrer heard on September 4, 2014. The Court ruled on the motion and issued an order dated September 26, 2014. There is a dispute between said parties concerning the propriety of the matter having been heard on that day, i.e., whether the parties had agreed to continue the hearing. The parties are currently trying to resolve this dispute, and require additional time to do so. In order for them to do so, and therefore in the event the parties are not able to resolve this dispute, the parties have agreed to extend the time until November 6, 2014 for plaintiffs to seek relief by filing a C.C.P. § 473 motion, a motion for -l- STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIMECo wenn nun F&F Ww Nn = RN NY NY NY NN DN DN Bee ew ee ee i oN A A FY NH —& SO we A DH BF WN SK SO reconsideration, an ex parte application, or other motion, that would seek to vacate the Court's September 26, 2014 order and that would afford plaintiffs the opportunity to file and have opposition heard to the September 4, 2014 motion. 11 DATED: October] 5, 2014 LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. KRANZ Yee (.