arrow left
arrow right
  • JOHNA PECOT et al VS. SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION, A et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • JOHNA PECOT et al VS. SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION, A et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • JOHNA PECOT et al VS. SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION, A et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • JOHNA PECOT et al VS. SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION, A et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • JOHNA PECOT et al VS. SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION, A et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • JOHNA PECOT et al VS. SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION, A et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
						
                                

Preview

a eka eS Ye DAD A RB BR MB m= SD COC we RD HW ee BN ret oO 20 LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. KRANZ PAUL L. KRANZ, ESQ., SBN 114999 ELECTRONICALLY 499 14" Street, Suite 300 Oakland, CA 94612 cope, IL ED. kranzlaw@sbeglobal.net County of San Francisco Telephone: (510) 839-1200 DEC on 2014 Facsimile: (510) 444-6698 Clerk of the Court BY: VANESSA WU . we Deputy Clerk Attorneys for Named Plaintiffs Johna Pecot, ef al, eputy Cler SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO JOHNA PECOT, et al. Individually and on Behalf of ) CASE NO. CGC-10-501168 All Others Similarly Situated, ) ) DECLARATION RE Plaintiffs, ) LATE FILING OF PLAINTIFFS’ ) MEMORANDUM OF POINTS v. ) AND AUTHORITIES IN ) OPPOSITION TO DEMURRER SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ) TO FIRST AMENDED ASSOCIATION, a California Nonprofit ) COMPLAINT Corporation, ef al. ) ) Date: December 9, 2014 Defendants. ) Time: 9:30am. Dept. 302 I, Paul L, Kranz, declare: 1. Lam an attorney at law duly licensed to practice before all the courts of the State of California. I know the following facts of my own knowledge and could and would testify to them in a court of law if called upon to do so. 1 am attomey of record for the Plaintiffs in this matter. 2. Plaintiffs’ Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Demurrer to First Amended Complaint was timely served on defendants. 3. My office sought to e-file the aforementioned document last week. However the “e- filing” of the aforementioned document was rejected last week because the proof of service had ele DECLARATION RE LATE FILING OPPOSITION TO DEMURRERCo we ND an electronic signature and not a handwritten signature. My office and | were unaware of this requirement. 4. We did not learn until today that the aforementioned document has been rejected for filing for the foregoing reason. 5. There should be no prejudice to any other party because the aforementioned document was timely served. 6. This mistake was entirely inadvertent and | apologize to the Court for it. I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed at Oakland, California, on December 1, Paulo Paul L. Kranz 2014. 2. DECLARATION RE LATE FILING OPPOSITION TO DEMURRERPROOF OF SERVICE SUPERIOR COURT ) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ; CASE NO. CCC-10-501168 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO } I, the undersigned, certify and attest as follows: Tam over the age of eighteen years and am not a party to the cause within. My business address is 499 14" Street, Suite 300, Oakland, California 94612. On December 1}, 2014, I caused the within: DECLARATION RE LATE FILING OF PLAINTIFFS’ MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO DEMURRER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT to be served on counsel for each of the other parties in this action by next delivery to the following addresses: Lara C. Smith, Esq. LAW OFFICE OF LARA C, SMITH 1086 Arlington Blvd. El Cerrito, California 94530 Lawrence D, Murray, Esq. Murray & Associates 1781 Union Street San Francisco, CA 94123-4426 Executed December 1, 2014 at Oakland, California. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Gloria Reynolds ~~