Motion-Secondary: JOHNA PECOT et al VS. SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION, A et al

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. KRANZ

PAUL L. KRANZ, ESQ., SBN 114999 ELECTRONICALLY

499 14" Street, Suite 300

Oakland, CA 94612 sopekr iL ED

kranzlaw@sbeglobal.net County of San Francisco

Telephone: (510) 839-1200 DEC 16 2014

Facsimile: (510) 444-6698 Clerk of the Court
BY: RONNIE OTERO

Attorneys for Named Plaintiffs Johna Pecot, ef al., Deputy Clerk

SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

JOHNA PECOT, et al. Individually and on Behalf of ) © CASE NO. CGC-10-501168
All Others Similarly Situated, )
) SUPPLEMENTAL
Plaintiffs, ) DECLARATION OF PAULL.
) KRANZIN SUPPORT OF
v. ) PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO
) DEFENDANTS’ SECOND
SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF’S ) MOTION TO STRIKE CLAIMS
ASSOCIATION, a California Nonprofit ) IN THE (FIRST) AMENDED
Corporation, et al. ) COMPLAINT
)
Defendants. ) Date: December 9, 2014
Time: 9:30 a.m.
Dept.: 302

J, Paul L. Kranz, declare:

1. Iam an attorney at law duly licensed to practice before all the courts of the State of
California, I know the following facts of my own knowledge and could and would testify to
them in a court of law if called upon to do so. I am attorney of record for the Plaintiffs in this
matter.

2. Linadvertently omitted to include as an exhibit to my prior declaration a true and

accurate copy of the June 27, 2014 cover letter I wrote to counsel that was included with the

-1-

SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO SECOND MOTION TO STRIKEservice of the First Amended Complaint, and which states in relevant part:
Please find enclosed Plaintiff's Amended Class Action Complaint.

We have also stricken those causes of action which were the subject of the Court’s ruling
on the anti-SLAPP motion.

A true and accurate copy of my June 27, 2014 letter is attached hereto as Exhibit J.
I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of California that the foregoing

is true and correct and that this declaration was executed at Oakland, California, on December

16, 2014. Plot ( Kar

Paul L. Kranz

-2.
SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO SECOND MOTION TO STRIKEEXHIBIT JLAW OFFICES

Paul L. Kranz
499 14™ STREET, SUITE 300
OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94710
TELEPHONE (510} 839-1200
FACSIMILE (510} 444-6689

June 27, 2014

Lara Cullinane-Smith. Esq. . Lawrence D. Murray, Esq.
Law Office of Lara C. Smith Murray & Associates

1086 Arlington Blvd. 1781 Union Street

EI Cerrito, California 94530 San Francisco, CA 94123-4426

Re: Pecot v. SFDSA;
San Franciso Superior Court No. CGC10-501168

Dear Counsel:
Please find enclosed Plaintiff's Amended Class Action Complaint.

We have also stricken those causes of action which were the subject of the Court’s ruling
on the anti-SLAPP motion.

Please contact me if you have any questions about the foregoing.
Very truly yours,
LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. KRANZ

Hue t. Cea
Paul L. Kranz

PLK:gr

Enel.PROOF OF SERVICE

SUPERIOR COURT )
)

STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) CASE NO. CCC-10-501168
)

COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO )

I, the undersigned, certify and attest as follows:

Tam over the age of eighteen years and am not a party to the cause within. My business
address is 499 14" Street, Suite 300, Oakland, California 94612.

On December 16, 2014, I caused the within:

SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF PAUL L. KRANZ IN SUPPORT OF
PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ SECOND MOTION TO
STRIKE CLAIMS IN THE (FIRST) AMENDED COMPLAINT

to be served on counsel for each of the other parties in this action by next delivery to the
following addresses:

Lawrence D. Murray, Esq.
Murray & Associates

1781 Union Street

San Francisco, CA 94123-4426

Lara C. Smith, Esq.
LAW OFFICE OF LARA C. SMITH

1086 Arlington Blvd.
El Cerrito, California 94530
Executed December 16, 2014 at Oakland, California.
1 declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Wal oe

Paul Cy Kranz