arrow left
arrow right
  • JOHNA PECOT et al VS. SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION, A et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • JOHNA PECOT et al VS. SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION, A et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • JOHNA PECOT et al VS. SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION, A et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • JOHNA PECOT et al VS. SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION, A et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • JOHNA PECOT et al VS. SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION, A et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
  • JOHNA PECOT et al VS. SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION, A et al CONTRACT/WARRANTY document preview
						
                                

Preview

ClV-110 "ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and adoress): PAUL L. KRANZ, SBN 114999, LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. KRANZ 499 14th Street, Suite 300, Oakland, CA 94612 TELEPHONE NO: (510) 839-1200 FAX NO. (Opionay: (810) 444-6698 E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): Kranzlaw@sbcglobal.net ATTORNEY FOR (Name): PLAINTIFFS SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY oF SAN FRANCISCO street aporess: 400 McAllister Street FOR COURT USE ONLY DISMISSAL ENTERED ELECTRONICALLY FILED Supertor Court of Caltfornia, maiuinc appress: 400 McAllister Street County of San Francisco cry anp zip cope: San Francisco, CA 94102 06/27/2016 BRANCH Name: RUSSELL OUTLAW Clerk of the Court BY:CAROL BALISTRERI PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Plaintiffs Johna Pecot, et al. Deputy Clerk DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: San Francisco Deputy Sheriffs' Association, et al. REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL case numper: CGC-10-501168 A conformed copy will not be returned by the clerk unless a method of return is provided with the document. This form may not be used for di issal of a derivative action or a class action or of any party or cause of action ina class action. (Cal. Rules of Court, rules 3.760 and 3.770.) 1. TO THE CLERK: Please dismiss this action as follows: a. (1) [7] With prejudice (2) Without prejudice b. (1) L¥_] Complaint (2) Petition (3) Cross-complaint filed by (name): on (date): (4) Cross-complaint filed by (name): on (date): (5) Entire action of all parties and all causes of action (6) L¥_] Other (specify):* Complaint as to Defendant San Francisco Deputy Sheriffs' Association 2. (Complete in all cases except family law cases.) The court did did not waive court fees and costs for a party in this case. (This information may be obtained from the clerk. If court fees and costs were waived, the declaration on the back of form must be completed). Date: 06/27/16 > Upird. C (eww# Paul L.Kranz eee 4 (TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF ATTORNEY PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY) (SIGNATURE) “if dismissal requested is of specified parties only of specified causes of action Attorney or party without attorney for: only, or of spectied cross-complaints only, 80 stale and identity the partes, ['¥'] piaintiff/Petitioner DefendantRespondent Cross~Complainant 3. TO THE CLERK: Consent to the above dismissal is hereby given.** Date: > (TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF ‘ATTORNEY PARTY \WMTHOUT ATTORNEY) (SIGNATURE) ** If a cross-complaint ~ or Response (Family Law) seeking affirmative Attorney or party without attorney for: Sion this conser f required by Gods of Give Procedure ceation 987 () Plaintiff/Petitioner Defendant/Respondent ord. Cross-Complainant (To be completed by clerk) 4. Dismissal entered as requested on (date): 5 Dismissal entered on (date): as to only (name): 6. Dismissal not entered as requested for the following reasons (specify): Ta. Attorney or party without attorney notified on (date): b. Attorney or party without attorney not notified. Filing party failed to provide a copy to be conformed means to return conformed copy Date: Clerk, by , Deputy Page 1 of 2 Form Adopted for Mandatory Uso Code of Ovi Procedure, § 581 et seq. “Tosal Cound ef Calteria REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL. Gov. Code, § 685876) Gal Ruse of Coir rule 8.1505 EiVAto fev. dan 1, 2013) ne cours. c3.907CIV-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Plaintiffs Johna Pecot, et al. CASE NUMBER: DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: San Francisco Deputy Sheriffs’ Association, et al. | CGC-10-501168 COURT'S RECOVERY OF WAIVED COURT FEES AND COSTS If a party whose court fees and costs were initially waived has recovered or will recover $10,000 or more in value by way of settlement, compromise, arbitration award, mediation settlement, or other means, the court has a statutory lien on that recovery. The court may refuse to dismiss the case until the lien is satisfied. (Gov. Code, § 68637.) Declaration Concerning Waived Court Fees 1. The court waived court fees and costs in this action for (name): 2. The person named in item 1 is (check one below): a. not recovering anything of value by this action. b. recovering less than $10,000 in value by this action. c. recovering $10,000 or more in value by this action. (if item 2c is checked, item 3 must be completed.) 3. All court fees and court costs that were waived in this action have been paid to the court (check one): Yes No |! declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the information above is true and correct. Date: (TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF ATTORNEY PARTY MAKING DECLARATION) (SIGNATURE) CIV-110 fRev. Jarwary 1, 2013] REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL Page 2 of 2PROOF OF SERVICE SUPERIOR COURT ) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ; CASE NO. CCC-10-501168 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ; I, the undersigned, certify and attest as follows: lam over the age of eighteen years and am not a party to the cause within. My business address is 499 14" Street, Suite 300, Oakland, California 94612. On June 27, 2016, I caused the within: REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFFS’ ASSOCIATION to be served on counsel for each of the other parties in this action by U.S. mail to the following addresses: Lara C. Smith, Esq. SHREM & SMITH 11720 San Pablo Avenue, #C El Cerrito, California 94530 e-mail: lara@shremlaw.com Lawrence D. Murray, Esq. Murray & Associates 1781 Union Street San Francisco, CA 94123 email: daydrmn@aol.com Executed June 27, 2016 at Oakland, California. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. line Kees 2