arrow left
arrow right
  • Sang Cheol Woo v. Charles C. Spackman Commercial Division document preview
  • Sang Cheol Woo v. Charles C. Spackman Commercial Division document preview
						
                                

Preview

KOBREsKIM LLP 800 THIRD AVENUE NEW YORK, NEw YORK 10022 WWW.KOBREKlM.COM TEL +1 212 488 1200 July 15, 2019 BY NYSCEF AND MAIL Honorable O. Peter Sherwood New York Supreme Court Commercial Division Part 49 60 Centre Street Room 252 New York, NY 10007 Re: Request to Schedule Oral Argument Sang Cheol Woo v. Charles C. Spackman, Index No. 6527 Dear Justice Sherwood: We represent the Plaintiff and Judgment Creditor Sang Cheol Woo in the case and write in connection with Matalon Shweky Elman PLLC's and Elman motion for a protective order (NYSCEF #87, #88 & #89) and Mr. Woo's oppo motion for garnishm-nt (NYSCEF #95, #96, & #97) (together, the "Motions"), been fully briefed since May 9, 2019. Hon. O. Peter Sherwood July 15, 2019 Page 2 notice, we respectfully request that the Court schedule oral argument on or before August 30, 2019, to allow time for the Motions to be decided before the restraining notice expires. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Darryl Stein Darryl Stein +1 212 488 1200 cc: All Counsel of Record (by NYSCEF).