On September 08, 2010 a
Party Discovery
was filed
involving a dispute between
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,
and
Does 1 To 10,
Wiskind, Dan,
Wiskind Llc,,
for EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740)
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
OANA
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Jun-05-2012 9:01 am
Case Number: CGC-10-503315
Filing Date: Jun-05-2012 9:00
Filed by: YOLANDA TABO-RAMIREZ
Juke Box: 001 Image: 03640627
DEFAULT COURT JUDGMENT - GENERAL
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. VS. WISKIND LLC, et al
001003640627
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.j i
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, state bar number, and address):
LISA E. SPIWAK, SBN 131587
[-SPIWAK & IEZZA, LLP
555 Marin Street
Suite 140
Thousand Oaks, CA 91360
reepHone No: (805) 777-1175 FAXNo. (Optionay:
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional):
ATTORNEY FOR (Meme): Plaintiff CLERK oF THE cou;
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO RY
STREET ADDRESS: 400 McAllister Street By,
MAILING ADDRESS: Same.
CMYANDZziPCODE: San Francisco, CA 94102
BRANCH NAME:
PLAINTIFF: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a National
Banking Association Cpe ote!
DEFENDANT: WISKIND, LLC, a California Limited Liabil
DEPUTY CLERy
JUDGMENT CASE NUMBER:
[_) By Clerk [X"] By Default After Court Triat cac-10-503315
OC] By Court On Stipulation Defendant Did Not
Appear at Trial
JUDGMENT
1. |X| BY DEFAULT
a. Defendant was properly served with a copy of the summons and complaint.
b. Defendant failed to answer the complaint or appear and defend the action within the time allowed by law.
c. Defendant's default was entered by the clerk upon plaintiff's application.
d. [—] Clerk's Judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(a)). Defendant was sued only on a contract or judgment of a court of
this state for the recovery of money. .
e. | X | Court Judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 686(b)). The court considered
(1) L__J plaintiff's testimony and other evidence.
(2) [X_} plaintiffs written declaration (Code Civ, Proc., § 585(d)).
2. ON STIPULATION
a. Plaintiff and defendant agreed (stipulated) that a judgment be entered in this case. The court approved the stipulated
judgment and
[_] the signed written stipulation was filed in the case.
c. the stipulation was stated in open court the stipulation was stated on the record.
3. AFTER COURT TRIAL. The jury was waived. The court considered the evidence.
a. The case was tried on (date and time):
before (name of judicial officer):
b. Appearances by:
[|] Plaintiff (name each): Plaintiffs attorney (name each):
(1) (1)
(2) Q)
Continued on Attachment 3b.
Defendant (name each): Defendant's attorney (name each):
(1) (1)
2) (2)
Continued on Attachment 3b.
c. Defendant did not appear at trial. Defendant was properly served with notice of trial.
d. |__| Astatement of decision (Code Civ. Proc., § 632) was not was requested.
Page 7 of 2
AN, _
Fort Appraved for Optional Use 7
Judicial Council af California . JUDGMENT
AUD-100 New January 1, 2002]
Code of Civil Procedure, §§ $85, 684.8,PLAINTIFF: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a National Banking CASE NUMBER:
Association CGC-10-503315
DEFENDANT: WISKIND, LLC, a California Limited Liabili
JUDGMENT IS ENTERED AS FOLLOWS BY: (x] THE courT THE CLERK
4, [1] Stipulated Judgment. Judgment is entered according to the stipulation of the parties.
5, Parties. Judgment is
a. [x] for plaintiff (name each): WELLS FARGO BANK, c. {J for cross-complainant (name each):
N.A., a National Banking
Association
and against defendant (names): WISKIND, LLC, and against cross-defendant (name each):
a California Limited Liability
Company; DAN WISKIND
Continued on Attachment Sa. [1 Continued on Attachment 5c,
b. for defendant (name each): d. [__] for cross-defendant (name each):
6. Amount.
a. _X_| Defendant named in item 5a above must e Cross-defendant named in item 5c above must pay
pay plaintiff on the complaint: cross-complainant on thig§ross-complaint:
(t) EQ] Damages $ 24,567.73 a Damages
(2) [3] Prejudgment $ 3,465.95 (2) Prejudgment
interest at the interest at the
annual rate of 10% annual rate of _
(3) LX] Attomey fees $ 2,800.00 3) Attomey fees
(4) [Xi Costs $ 480.00 (4) [—] Costs
©) C5 other (specify): $ 0.00 ©) [7] Other (specify):
| ©) TOTAL $ 31,313.68 | | © TOTAL
b. [__] Plaintiff to receive nothing from defendant d. Cross-complainant to receive nothing from
named in item 5b, cross-defendant named in item 5d.
{"] Defendant named in item 5b to recover (=) Gross-defendant named in item 5d to recover
costs $ 0.00 . costs $0.00
L_] and attomey fees $ 0.00 and attorney fees $0.00
7. (1) Other (specify):
Date: >
JUN 05 2012
bates JUN 06 2012 “peputy
(SEAL) CLERK'S CERTIFICATE, « : (Optional
{ certify that this is a true copy of the original judgment on file in the court.
Date:
Clerk, by . Deputy
Page 20f 2
TUD-100 [New January 4, 2002] JUDGMENT
Document Filed Date
June 05, 2012
Case Filing Date
September 08, 2010
Category
EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.