On September 01, 2010 a
Request,Application
was filed
involving a dispute between
Lsh Investments Llc,
and
Does 1 To 10, Incl.,
Loarca-Herrera, Berta Consuelo,
for UNLAWFUL DETAINER - RESIDENTIAL
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
MAMET
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Sep-17-2010 11:38 am
Case Number: CUD-10-634278
Filing Date: Sep-17-2010 11:35
Juke Box: 001 Image: 02974238
LERKS JUDGMENT - UNLAWFUL DETAINER - POSSESSION ONL
LSH INVESTMENTS LLC VS. BERTA CONSUELO LOARC-HERRERA et al
001002974238
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.oN
UD-110
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT. ATTORNEY (Name, state bar number, and. address):
[- Kathryn Quetel (SBN 167100)
Bornsteir::& Bornstein
507 Polk Street, Suite 320
San Francisco, CA 94102-3339
TetepHoneno.: (415) 409-7611
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional:
ATTORNEY FOR Nama): __LSH Investments, LLC
FAX NO.(Optionay: (415) 409-9345
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF San Francisco
street aporess: 400 McAllister Street
maine aporess: 400 McAllister Street
city ano zp cove: San Francisco, CA 94102
sranci name: Civic Center Courthouse
PLAINTIFF: LSH Investments, LLC
DEFENDANT: Berta Consuelo Loarca-Herrera
FOR COURT USE ONLY
foe
aA pha, me
JUDGMENT - UNLAWFUL DETAINER
[) By Defautt
[) Possession Only
(&) By Clerk
Cy By Court
CC) After Court Triat
(2) Defendant Did Not
Appear at Trial
CASE NUMBER:
CUD-10-634278
JUDGMENT
1. [) BY DEFAULT
a. Defendant was properly served with a copy of the summons and complaint.
b. Defendant failed to answer the complaint or appear and defend
c. Defendant's default was entered by the clerk upon plaintiffs ap
the action within the time allowed by iaw.
plication.
ad. [(E) Clerk's Judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 1189). For possession only of the premises described on page 2 (item 4).
e. Cy Court Judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(b)). The court considered
(1) (C) plaintirs testimony and other evidence.
(2) (C) plaintiffs or others! written declaration and evidence (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(d)).
2. (CY AFTER COURT TRIAL. The jury was waived. The court considered the evidence.
a, The case was tried on (date and time) :
before (name of judicial Officer) ;
b. Appearances by:
CY Plaintiff (name each) :
(2) Continued on Attachment 2b (form MC-025).
C) Defendant (name each):
(OY Continued on Attachment 2b (form’MC-025).
C oO Defendant did not appear at trial. Defendant was properly
a. (2) A statement of decision (Code Civ, Proc., § 632) [2] was not (C) was
(CQ Plaintiffs attorney (name each):
(1)
(2)
C2) Defendant's attorney (name each) :
(1)
(2)
served with notice of trial.
requested.
Page 1 of 2
gm pproved or Qpianal Use
Judicial Council of Califomia
Martin Deans
UD-170 [New January , 2003}
ESseNTiAL Fas
JUDGMENT - UNLAWFUL DETAINER
Code of Civil Procedure,
585(q), 68:
x!
15.48,
1169,a
PLaintiFF: LSH Investments, LLG CASE NUMBER
CUD-10-634278
DEFENUANT: Berta Consuelo Loarca-Herrera
JUDGMENT IS ENTERED AS FOLLOWS BY: [CL] THE COURT () THE CLERK
3. Parties. Judgment is
a. [E} for plaintiff (name each) : LSH Investments, LLC
and against defendant (name each): Berta Consuelo Loarca-Herrera
CD Continued on Attachment 3a (form MC-025).
b. (J for defendant (name each) :
4, [X) Plaintitt (2) Defendant is entitied to possession of the premises located at(street address, apartment. city, and county):
462 Thomton Avenue
San Francisco CA 94124 San Francisco
5. Judgment applies to all occupants of the Premises including tenants, subtenants if any, and named claimants if any (Code Civ.
Proc., §§ 715.010, 1169 and 1174.3).
6. CQ Amount and terms of judgment
a, C2) Defendant named in item 3a above must pay plaintiffon —_b. uo Plaintiff is to receive nothing from defendant
the complaint: named in item 3b,
(2) Defendant named in item 3b is to recover
(1) (L] Past-due rent $ costs: $
(2) 2) Holdover damages $ CQ) ang attorney fees: $
(3) (C] Attorney fees $
(4) LL] Costs $
(8) CQ Other (specify) : $
(6) TOTAL JUDGMENT $
¢. (2) The rental agreement is canceied, CC) The lease is forfeited.
7. (2) Conditional judgment. Plaintiff has breached the agreement to provide habitable premises to defendant as Stated in
Judgment-Unlawful Detainer Attachment (form UD-1 108), which is attached.
8. [) Other (specify) :
(2) Continued on Attachment 8 (form MC-025). ZO
Date: L\ ] {
Pate: SEP 17 2010)
(SEAL) CLERK'S CERTIFICATE (Optional)
| certify that this is a true copy of the original judgment on file in the court.
Date:
Clerk, by , Deputy
UD-110 [New January 1, 2003} JUDGMENT - UNLAWFUL DETAINER Page 2 of 2
Document Filed Date
September 17, 2010
Case Filing Date
September 01, 2010
Category
UNLAWFUL DETAINER - RESIDENTIAL
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.