arrow left
arrow right
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

Joanne Rosendin, Esq., SBN: 121025 SACK ROSENDIN, LLP One Kaiser Plaza, Suite 340 ELECTRONICALLY Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: (510) 286-2200 FILED Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco Attorneys for Defendant, CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY, JUL 30 2010 an Illinois corporation Clerk of the Court BY: CHRISTLE ARRIOLA Deputy Clerk SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO LAURANCE HAGEN, NO, CGC-10-275582 Plaintiff, DISCOVERY v. OBJECTION TO STIPULATION OF COURT COMMISSIONER ACTING AS ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF JUDGE PRO TEMPORE CALIFORNIA, et al., [Per Local Rule 6.13)] Defendants, TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: Defendant CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY, an Illinois corporation, does not stipulate and hereby objects pursuant to San Francisco Superior Court Discovery Rule 8.14(D)(1) to the assignment of any discovery matter for determination or hearing by Court Commissioner acting as Judge Pro Tempore. DATED: July 30, 2010 SACK ROSENDIN, LLP GAASBIHAGEN, Laurance - CBI\PL.D - OBJ TO JUDGE PRO TEM FOR DISC - CBL-wpd -1- OBJECTION TO STIPULATION OF COURT COMMISSIONER ACTING AS JUDGE PRO TEMPORE