arrow left
arrow right
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

BR won 28 rela Bravo ~ Mae LLP 288 Moiugonity Sica, {7b Fleor ‘Ses Femi, GA 94104 1S) 954-1400 Sandra A. Edwards (State Bar No. 154578) sedwards@fbm.com Akshay R. Verma (State Bar No. 246803) ELECTRONICALLY averma@fbm.com Farella Braun + Martel LLP F ILE D 235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor Superior Court of California, San Francisco, CA 94104 . County of San Francisco Telephone: (415) 954-4400 AUG 26 2010 Facsimile: (415) 954-4480 Clerk of the Court BY: JUDITH NUNEZ Attorneys for Defendant Deputy Clerk BHP Minerals International, Inc. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO LAURANCE HAGEN, Case No. CGC-10-275582 Plaintiff, BHP MINERALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.’S OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFFS vs. CCP § 998 OFFER TO COMPROMISE ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF Complaint Filed: June 20, 2010 CALIFORNIA, et al, Trial Date: Not yet assigned Defendants. Defendant BHP Minerals International, Inc. (“BHP”) objects to plaintiff Laurance Hagen’s (“Plaintiff”) Offer to Compromise pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 998, on the grounds that it is premature. As of this date, BHP does not have sufficient facts or information to determine if Plaintiff's offer is reasonable. Section 998 was enacted to encourage the settlement of lawsuits prior to trial and to punish a party that fails to accept a reasonable offer. (See, 7.44. Cobb v. Superior Court, (1984) 36 Cal. 3d 273, 280.) However, a party is not expected to accept an unreasonable offer, or one not made in good faith. (Elrod v. Oregon Cummins Diesel, Inc., (1987) 195 Cal. App. 3d 692, 698, 699.) The reasonableness of an offer is determined by the information known or the information that reasonably should have been known to the offeree. (Jd. at 699). Furthermore, if a party makes a Section 998 Offer to Compromise with the knowledge that the offeree lacks 259092353779.1 BHP MINERALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.’S OBJECTION TO PLTF'S CCP §998 OFFER,28 Paves Brant + Mire LLP 235 Manigontery Stet, 17h Bloor Say Feancisco, CA 94404 cat5) 954.4400 information necessary to evaluate the offer, the offer was not made in good faith. (£d. at 700). Accordingly, an offer that is unreasonable and made with a lack of good faith is an invalid Offer to Compromise under Section 998. Cd. at 698-699.) In this case, insufficient discovery ahs been completed to enable BHP to accurately analyze the reasonableness of Plaintiff's Offer to Compromise. No depositions have been taken and Plaintiff has not yet served responses to Standard Interrogatories, Set Two. Further BHP has not received all medical reports, employment records and/or other discovery responses. Thus, BHP lacks the requisite information to accurately determine the reasonableness of Plaintiff's offer. Since Plaintiff is aware that discovery is not complete in this case, his Offer to Compromise is lacking im good faith. Therefore, Plaintiff's offer fails to effectuate the policy of encouraging settlement of lawsuits prior to trial, and is invalid as a section 998 Offer to Compromise. Based on the above objections, BHP requests that the Court not impose the augmented costs included within Code of Civil Procedure Section 998. Dated: August 26, 2010 FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP Oa A. Edwards Attomeys for Defendant BHP Minerals International, Inc. ~2- 2590%2353779.1 BHP MINERALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.’S OBJECTION TO PLTF’S CCP §998 OFFER28 Farota Beaws + Mane! LL? 235 Monigumusy Sues, (7h Flor Sau Frnncinen CA 94:04 US) 954-1400 PROOF OF SERVICE —- ELECTRONIC Laurance Hagen y. Associated Insulation of California, et al. San Francisco Superior Court Action No. CGS-10-275582 Tam employed in the County of San Franicisco, State of California. I am over the age of eighteen and not a party to this action. My business address is Russ Building, 235 Montgomery Street, 17" Floor, San Francisco, California 94104 and my electronic notification address is shunt@fom.com. On August 26, 2010, I electronically served through LexisNexis File & Serve the following document(s): BHP MINERALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.’S OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFF'S CCP § 998 OFFER TO COMPROMISE on the parties designated on the transaction receipt from LexisNexis File & Serve, a copy of which is kept with our file. The documents were served electronically and the transmission was reported as comptete and without error. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on August 26, 2010, at San Francisco, California. Durerrn. Chons | Susan C, Hunt -3- 259012353779.1 BHP MINERALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.’S OBJECTION TO PLTE’S CCP §998 OFFER