arrow left
arrow right
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

ce WD mH Rh WY NH RoNM RW RP PR NY KR NM RP Ee eB Be me Be oe Re Se Be oe SB eS RRP BS SF SF SF FARRAH RB HY SF STS Jeffrey S. Gillespie, State Bar No. 192495 Ulla M. Pajala, State Bar No. 184130 BURNHAM BROWN A Professional Law Corporation ELECTRONICALLY P.O. Box 119 FILED Oakland, California 94604 Superior Court of California, aoe County of San Francisco 1901 Harrison Street, 11th Floor AUG 26 2010 Oakland, California 94612 Clerk of the Court Telephone: (510) 444-6800 BY: WILLIAM TRUPEK Facsimile: (510) 835-6666 Deputy Clerk Attorneys for Defendant F.W. SPENCER & SON, INC. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION LAURANCE HAGEN, No. CGC-10-275382 Plaintiff, OBJECTIONS OF DEFENDANT F.W. SPENCER & SON, INC. TO ‘ v. PLAINTIFFS’ C.C.P. § 998 OFFER TO COMPROMISE ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA et al., Complaint Filed: June 2, 2010 Defendants. Defendant F.W, SPENCER & SON, INC. (“F.W. SPENCER”), hereby objects to Plaintiff LAURANCE HAGEN’s (“Plaintiff”) Code of Civil Procedure Section 998 Offer to Compromise on the grounds that the offer is premature and not made in good faith and compliance with the intent of Code of Civil Procedure section 998 to settle the action in good faith. Instead, Plaintiff's offer is a device to shift costs to F.W. SPENCER without justification. Plaintiff knows that F.W. SPENCER does not have sufficient facts or information to determine if Plaintiff's offer is reasonable. Code of Civil Procedure section 998 was enacted to encourage settlement of lawsuits before trial, and to punish parties which fail to accept a reasonable offer. T. M. Cobb Company y, Superior Court, 36 Cal.3d 273, 280 (1984). However, parties are not expected to accept an 1 OBIECTIONS OF DEFENDANT FW. SPENCER & SON, INC. TO PLAINTIFFS CCP” CGC-10-275582 998 OFFER TO COMPROMISEwe 6 RB RD HW FB Be Ne yo, RN NM ON Be Se Se Be ee ee ee a ££ FS vy SF SF SC he WD Rh BF BH MP SB S 27 unreasonable offer, or an offer which is not made in good faith. Elrod vy. Oregon Cummins Diesel, 195 Cal.App.3d 692, 698-699 (1987). The reasonableness of an offer is determined by the information known, or the information that reasonably should have been known, to the offeree, Id. at 699: Ifa party makes a Code of Civil Procedure section 998 offer with the knowledge that the offeree lacks the information necessary to evaluate the offer, the offer is not made in good faith, Id, at 700. Accordingly, an offer that is unreasonable and made with a lack of good faith is invalid as a Code of Civil Procedure Section 998 Offer to Compromise. Id, at 698-699. In this case, insufficient discovery has been completed to enable F.W. SPENCER to accurately analyze the reasonableness of Plaintiff's offer to compromise. F.W, SPENCER was recently served with Plaintiff's Complaint, which was filed on June 2, 2010. Plaintiff has only provided unverified responses to Standard Asbestos Interrogatories, Set One. F.W. SPENCER cannot propound its Special Interrogatories to Plaintiff until after Plaintiff's responses to Standard Asbestos Interrogatories, Set Two, are received. There is no date for Plaintiff's deposition. No discovery has been done of medical and other issues on the subject of expert testimony. No depositions of Plaintiff's co-workers have been taken by any defendant in this case. Finally, Plaintiff's expert witnesses remain unidentified and/or undisclosed. Plaintiff’s Code of Civil Procedure Section 998 Offer cannot have been intended as a good faith effort to settle the case, as Plaintiff has not provided F.W. SPENCER with any specific information in support of the broad general claims against it in the complaint. Therefore, Plaintiff's offer is invalid as a Code of Civil Procedure Section 998 Offer to Compromise, and fails to effectuate the policy of encouraging settlement of lawsuits in good faith prior to trial. DATED: August Ae, 2010 BURNHAM BROWN 2 - [tha VO4 ake, ULLA M. PAJALA Attorneys for Defendant F.W. SPENCER & SON, INC. 1926308 2 ~OBIECTIONS OF DEFENDANT F.W. SPENCER & SON, INC. TO PLAINTIFFS’ C.CP.§ CGC-10-275582 998 OFFER TO COMPROMISERe: Laurance Hagan v. Associated Insulation of California, et al. Court: San Francisco Superior Court Action No: CGC-10-275582 PROOF OF SERVICE OF ELECTRONIC SERVICE I, declare that 1 am over the age of 18, not a party to the above-entitled action, and am an employee of Burnham Brown whose business address is 1901 Harrison Street, 11" Floor, Oakland, Alameda County, California 94612 (mailing address: Post Office Box 119, Oakland, California 94604). On the date executed below, I electronically served the document(s) via LexisNexis File & Serve described as: OBJECTIONS OF DEFENDANT F.W. SPENCER & SON, INC. TO PLAINTIFFS’ C.C.P. § 998 OFFER TO COMPROMISE on recipients designated on the Transaction Receipt located on the LexisNexis File & Serve website. [ declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and was executed on August AE. 2010 at Oakland, California. PROOF OF SERVICE " ~ "NO. 275582