arrow left
arrow right
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

1 || MICHAEL.J. PIETRYKOWSKI (SBN: 118677) MPietrvkowski@eordonrees.com 2 || Embarcadero Center West ELECTRONICALLY 275 Battery Street, Twentieth Floor FILED 3 San Francisco, CA 94111 Superior Court of California, 4 pougphone: a) ae County of San Francisco aestenile: (415) 986: SEP 14 2010 5 || Attomeys.for Defendant Clerk of the Court HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION CO eee Ne epuly Blerk 6 7 8 5 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA — COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 || LAURANCE HAGEN, ) CASE NO, CGC-10-275582 es U ; ne 8 Plaintiffs, ) DEFENDANT HENSEL PHELPS gee 12 } CONSTRUCTION CO’S DEMAND FOR geeks B v. ) JURY TRIAL Bege oe ) eps > ,, | ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF j 852526 | || CALIFORNIA, etal, \ Rubese ) e af & iy 15 Defendants. ) £° 16 ) 17 18 || TO.ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 19 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION CO hereby. 20 || demands a jury trial in this action. 21 22 ||DATED: September / , 2010 GORDON & REES LLP 23 4 om ‘ om 0 Bye ASE Michael J. Pietrykowski 95 Attorneys for Defendant. HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION co. 26 aoe i — DEFENDANT HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION CO’S JURY DEMANDR4086640.1 PROOF OF SERVICE BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION Re: Laurance Hagen v. Associated Insulation of California., et al., San Francisco County Superior Court Case No CGC-10-275582 1, Silvia Escobar, declare: that I am, and was at the time of service of the documents herein referred.to, over the age of.18 years, and not a party to the action; and I am employed inthe County of San Francisco, California, My business address is Gordon & Rees LLP, Embarcadero Center West, 275 Battery Street, 20th Floor, San Francisco, California 941.11. On the date. executed below, | electronically served the document(s) via LexisNexis File & Serve described as: Defendant Hensel Phelps Construction Co’s Demand For Jury Trial on the recipients designated on the Transaction Receipt located on the LexisNexis File & Serve website. | declare under penalty of perjury pursuant to the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is.true and correct and was executed on 4d September“) , 2010-at San Francisco, California. fi a ON f { “ \. case assistant (0 Michael J>Pietrykowski Stet My oe Silvia Escobar,