arrow left
arrow right
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

Brian R. McClellan, SBN 114093 LAW OFFICE OF BRIAN McCLELLAN 505 14" Street, Suite 1210 oe ; ; Oakland, CA $4612 : co ELECTRONICALLY Telephone: 510-457-9940 FILED Facsimile: 510-893-184 1 Supetior-Court of California, County of San Francisco Attorneys:for Defendant, a APR 07 2011 DOME CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION ‘| -Clerk of the Court BY: WILLIAM TRUPEK Deputy Clerk 4 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION LAURENCE HAGEN } Case No. CGC-10:275582 Plaintiff, . . - v a ) NOTICE OF MOTION TO COMPEL ) DIscoveRY POINTS @ ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF : ) AUTHORITIES, STATEMENT OF CALIFORNIA; Defendatts as Reflected on. .). DISCOVERY IN DISPUTE Exhibit:1 Attached to the Summary Complaint). DECLARATION OF BRIAN hetein; and DOES 1-8500. ; McCLELLAN =~ : ). DATE: May 12,2011 Defendants. — . TIME: 9:01 AM - DEPT: 220 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN’ ‘that on May/@ , 2011 at 9:00.AM in Department #80 of the above entitled Court located at 400 McAllister Street, $an Francisco, California, Defendant Dome Construction will move this Court for an Order compelling: Plaintiff Laurance Hagen to provide . further responses, to Special Interrogatories, Request for Production of Documents, Request. for Admissions, and Form interrogatory.17.1 and for-monetary sanctions. : This Motion will be made-on the grounds that there ig good cause to compel farther responses as Plaintiff has only provided unsubstantiated and frivolous objections. to otherwise valid discovery and has failed to respond.to Defendant's meet:and confer letter.23 24 ‘This Motion will be based on this Notice of Motion, the Points and Authorities, attached and filed || with this Motion; the Statement of Discovery, in Dispute, the Declaration of Brian McClellan the. Court files and any. oral argumentto be had onthe matter. Dated: April 6.2011). Los LAW OFFICES OF BREAN MeCLELLAN Brian RY ‘MeCiellan Attomeys for Defendant DOME CONSTRUCTION CORPORATIONHagen vs, Associated Insulation of California, et al. San Francisco County Superior Court Case # CGC-10-275582 PROOF OF SERVICE 1, the undsersigned, declare as follows: / 1 arn employed in the county of Alameda, California, and | am over the age of 18 years and not. a party to-the within action. My business address is Law Offices of Brian McClellan, 505 14" Street, Suite 1210, Oakland, CA 94612. On the date executed below, Telectronically served the document(s) via LexisNexis File & Serve discribed-as: NOTICE OF MOTION TO COMPEL, FURTHER RESPONSES TO DISCOVERY, POINTS & AUTHORITIES, STATEMENT OF DISCOVERY IN DISPUTE DECLARATION OF BRIAN McCLELLAN on the recepients designated on the Transaction Receipt located on the LexisNexis File & Serve website. : , a I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws.of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.. Executed on April 7, 2011, at Oakland, California. i“ . Veronica Lopez