arrow left
arrow right
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

eee ee Ge ee aa TT 's i. Bar No. | LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP FILED 221 North Figueroa Suite 1200 ; Los Angeles, CA 90012 County of Sar|.Francisco THEPHONENO: 2E3-250-1B00 — rwcnd.(opieony: 213-250-7900 : JUN 02/2011 Clerk of the Court BY: RAYMONE} K. WONG ! Deputy Clerk WAUNGADDRESS: chvanduecone San Francisco, CA BRANCHKAME incest! | LAURANCE HAGAN v. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) pare aa (Without Court Order} THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES ARE NOTIFIED THAT {name}: Bragg Investment Compa A toa he following substitution: 1. Former {egal representative [] Party represented eatt_ [2] Atiomey (name). Judd A, Gilefiky 2. Now legalrepresentative [_] Pany ls representing saltt [7] Attomey a. Nema: William M.:Hake b, State Bar No. (# applicable}: 110956 c. Address (number, sfrest, city, ZIP, ang lew firm name, # applicable: Cooley Manion Jones Hake Kurowski LLP 201 Spear Street, 18th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105 d. Telephona No. (include area coda): 415-512-4381 3. The party making thia subattytion isa] plomtit [J defendant C—J netttener L—] respondent [ether éspacity): *NOTICE TO PARTIES APFLYING TO REPRESENT THEMSELVES = ° Guardian * Personal Representative > Guardian ad liter «Conservator » Probate fiduciary + Unincomporated * Trustee + Corporation wssoclation eee are abelving as one of she parties on this Hist; you may NOT act as your own attamey tn most cases. Use this form to substitute one attorney for another attomey. SEEK LEGAL ADVICE BEFORE APPLYING TO REPRESENT YOURSELF, NOTICE TO PARTIES WITHOUT ATTORNEYS A party repracenting himself or herself may wish to seek legal aestatance. Failure to take ‘imaly and appropriate acfon In this case may sepult In serious legal consequences. 4. Loonsent to thls substitution, Date: May &°7, 2011 g Investment: &.L2"] | coneant to this aybatitution. ba: May ZT, 2011 : William M. Hake Coplay Manion Jones et al. > AAA, (DVee aR Pray NAME ° gin sect Spe revoree for proot of serves by mel) . seis POD, “Fe Aloe os Mande Lie SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY—CMIL edt recat 2a Sela ec deny on {Without Court Order) Sa aatiLAW OFFICES OF COOLEY MANION JONES HAKE KUROWSKI LLP Co Ce ND WH BF BW NHN NH NY YP NY NY YQ NNR Rm me a se eo YW A vA FB YN & S Owe QD DA vA BF Ye YY S& Laurance Hagan y. Asbestos Defendants (BP) San Francisco Superior Court Case No, CGC-10-275582 PROOF OF SERVICE BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMITTAL Iam a citizen of the United States and employed in San Francisco County, California. [ am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within-entitled action. My business address is 201 Spear Street, 18" Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105. On June 1, 2011, I electronically served via Lexis/Nexis File and Serve the following document(s) on all parties as set forth in the accompanying transaction report: SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY - CIVIL I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. Executed on June 1, 2011, at San Francisco, California. MAE CHU PROOF OF SERVICE