arrow left
arrow right
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
  • LAURANCE HAGEN VS. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 a iW 4 S 2 12 &: 13 a< oe 14 me 15 gE E < 16 oO 17 n 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 340308.1. 1210,00000 MARK A. LOVE (SBN 162028) mlove@selmanlaw.com JUSTIN CLARK (SBN 305503) Ee ONIALe jclark@selmanlaw.com FILED SELMAN BREITMAN LLP Superior Court of California, 33 New Montgomery, Sixth Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-4537 County of San Francisco Telephone: 415.979.0400 05/17/: 2016 Facsimile: 415.979.2099 BYROMY RISK Deputy Clerk Attorneys for Intervenor FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, on behalf of its suspended insured, Defendant ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA, INC. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO — UNLIMITED JURISDICTION LAURANCE HAGEN, Case No. CGC-10-275582 Plaintiffs, EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION v. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF Date: May 19, 2016 CALIFORNIA, INC., et al., Time: 11:00 AM Judge: Hon. Garrett L. Wong Defendants. Dept.: 503 Action Filed: June 2, 2010 ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA, INC. ("ASSOCIATED INSULATION") brings this single ex parte application. ASSOCIATED INSULATION is currently a suspended corporation by the Secretary of State. The California Franchise Tax Board does not even have any record of ASSOCIATED INSULATION. As such, ASSOCIATED INSULATION lacks the capacity to defend itself in this asbestos lawsuit filed against it, pursuant to Revenue & Taxation Code §23301. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company ("INTERVENOR"), pursuant to the terms of it respective insurance policy(ies) and solely in its capacity as an insurer of ASSOCIATED INSULATION, now seeks leave of court to file a Complaint in Intervention in this case in order to specifically name INTERVENOR as intervenor on behalf of ASSOCIATED INSULATION. The purpose of the INTERVENOR'S intervention 1 EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7 11 J 12 Bz G3 13 Se Oz 14 2 me 15 sé E g 16 Oo 17 Nn 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 340308.1 1210,00000 is to contest ASSOCIATED INSULATION 's alleged liability and the amount of damages, if any, alleged by plaintiffs. INTERVENOR also requests that the Court deem that the complaint in intervention constitute the answer to plaintiffs’ complaint against ASSOCIATED INSULATION and that the Court grant INTERVENOR leave to appear and defend ASSOCIATED INSULATION in this action in the name of ASSOCIATED INSULATION, pursuant to the terms of its respective insurance policy(ies) and solely in its capacities as insurer of ASSOCIATED INSULATION. Pursuant to this ex parte application, INTERVENOR hereby requests an order granting it leave to file a complaint in intervention in this case. INTERVENOR will suffer severe prejudice and be irreparably harmed if it is deprived of the right to intervene in this case on behalf of ASSOCIATED INSULATION. Good cause exists for granting this ex parte application because ASSOCIATED INSULATION is prohibited from defending itself in this asbestos lawsuit. INTERVENOR and ASSOCIATED INSULATION will be severely prejudiced if INTERVENOR is not allowed to intervene on behalf of ASSOCIATED INSULATION in this case. This Ex Parte Application is based on the Declaration of Justin L. Clark, the Memorandum of Points and Authorities served and filed with this Application, and on the papers and records on file in this matter, and on such oral and documentary evidence as may be presented at the hearing on the application. DATED: May | 7, 2016 SELMAN BREITMAN LLP B A. /SUSTIN CLARK Attorneys for Intervenor FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, on behalf of its suspended insured, Defendant ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA, INC. 2 EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTIONSelman Breitman LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW B 340416. PROOF OF SERVICE BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION Laurance Hagen v. Associated Insulation of California, et al. San Francisco Superior Court, Case No, CGC-10-275582 Defendant: Intervenor FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY on behalf of its suspended insured, Defendant ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA, INC. I am employed in the County of San Francisco, State of California. I am over the age of 18 years and am not a party to the within action; my business address is 33 New Montgomery, Sixth Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94105-4537. On May 17, 2016, I electronically served the following document(s) via File & ServeXpress described as: EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION on the recipients designated on the Transaction Receipt located on the File & ServeXpress website. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on May 17, 2016, at San Francisco, California. (Ke Martin 1210,00000.