On June 22, 2010 a
Trial Materials
was filed
involving a dispute between
Cathay Bank, A California Banking Corporation,
Qui, Dong Ying,
Ray Kai, Llc, A California Limited Liability,
Xiang Kai, Llc.; A California Limited Liability,
Zhang, Cindy,
Zhang, Raymond,
Zhangs, Llc, A California Limited Liability,
and
Does 1 Through 200, Inclusive,
Qui, Dong Ying,
Ray Kai, Llc, A California Limited Liability,
Xiang Kai, Llc.; A California Limited Liability,
Zhang, Cindy,
Zhang, Raymond,
Zhangs, Llc, A California Limited Liability,
for civil
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
OA
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Oct-31-2012 3:19 pm
| Case Number: CGC-10-500934
Filing Date: Oct-31-2012 3:19
Filed by: LESLEY FISCELLA
Juke Box: 001 Image: 03824505
ORDER
CATHAY BANK, A CALIFORNIA BANKING CORPORATION VS. RAYMOND
XIANG ZHANG et al
001003824505
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.27
ostsa associates, 5.
11440 BROADWAY
‘surTE 1000
OAKLAND, CA 94612
($10) 632.1686
Chijeh Hu (SBN 241271)
Maureen McCuaig (SBN 279036)
Scott Nenni (SBN 280990)
CJH & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
1440 Broadway, Suite 1000
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: (510) 832-1686 San Francised County.
Fax: (510) 251-1155 “ “
G19) OCT 31 2012
Attorney for Defendants/Cross Complainants,
RAYMOND ZHANG, et al. oN OF THE.COURT
*: “Deputy Cigtc ©
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
CATHAY BANK, a California banking CASE NO: CGC- 10 - 500934
Corporation,
IRDER GRANTING
DEFENDANT'S EX PARTE:APPLICAT
Plaintiff, FOR ORDER SHORTENING RESPON
TIME AND ADVANCING HEARING DAT
MOTION TO SUBMIT EXPERT WITNESS
v. LIST acd
RAYMOND XIANG KAI ZHANG, et al.,
Date: October 31, 2012
Time: 11:00am
Dept.: 302
Defendants.
Complaint filed: June 22, 2010
The ex parte application of Defendants Raymond Zhang, et al, for an order to shorten
motion response times and advance the hearing date was regularly heard at the above date and
time. The Court has determined that the requested order will be in the furtherance of justice and
help the parties prepare for trial. Plaintiff does not oppose Defendant’s ex parte request.
JT IS ORDERED that the hearing date on Defendant’s motion to submit tardy expert
witness list and/or augment expert witness list currently set for November 26, adv;
4.0904 :
to November (3, 2012.pPlaintif?’ s opposing papers, if any, shall be filed/and s
‘@RRQRQSED) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT LEAVE TO AMEND TO VERIFY ANSWER27
CAH & ASSOCIATES, Fc.
1440 BROADWAY
SUITE 1000
OAKLAND, CA 94612
(810) 832-1686
1S Wawed .
opposing counsel via email on November S_, 2012, and Defendant’s reply -tfany; Siiall Be
filed and-served-on-opposing
Dated: rofaily2— ft |
JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR C
TH. GOLDSME
ae wo be pce aNEKE GRLDEMIT
hee oe Eau’ h Pry pect ys Eirt paw te tee ee ..
ko Wis matech SON toe pron ohed be Depatoet
N guwwrto— Be ZADL at W108 pm
Me weno Venns ante,
2012.
Covelesn Lopses
Pl ] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT LEAVE TO AMEND TO VERIFY ANSWER
Document Filed Date
October 31, 2012
Case Filing Date
June 22, 2010
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.