On June 22, 2010 a
Party Discovery
was filed
involving a dispute between
Cathay Bank, A California Banking Corporation,
Qui, Dong Ying,
Ray Kai, Llc, A California Limited Liability,
Xiang Kai, Llc.; A California Limited Liability,
Zhang, Cindy,
Zhang, Raymond,
Zhangs, Llc, A California Limited Liability,
and
Does 1 Through 200, Inclusive,
Qui, Dong Ying,
Ray Kai, Llc, A California Limited Liability,
Xiang Kai, Llc.; A California Limited Liability,
Zhang, Cindy,
Zhang, Raymond,
Zhangs, Llc, A California Limited Liability,
for civil
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
MEIC
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Oct-04-2012 2:54 pm
Case Number: CGC-10-500934
Filing Date: Oct-04-2012 2:54
Filed by: MICHAEL RAYRAY
Juke Box: 001 Image: 03791837
GENERIC CIVIL FILING (NO FEE)
CATHAY BANK, A CALIFORNIA BANKING CORPORATION VS. RAYMOND
XIANG ZHANG et al
001003791837
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.POS-030
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY
Chijeh Hu (SBN 241271)
CJH & Associates P.C.
1440 Broadway, Suite 1000
Oakland, CA 94612
tevepHone no:(510) 832-1686 FAX NO. (Optionay-(510) 251-1 159
E-MAIL ADDRESS coninarhhu(@cjhape.com buperior Court of California
ATTORNEY FOR (Nemo): Defendant, Raymond Xiang Kai Zhang, et al. eeunty of San Francisco
‘SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF San Francisco oct 04 202
street aopress:400 McAllister Street
maine aooress:400 MCA llister Street LERK THE COURT
civy ano zip cove: San Francisco 94102
pranch name:Civic Center BY: 7 Baputy Ciel
PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF:Cathay Bank
RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT:Raymond Xiang Kai Zhang, et al.
CASE NUMBER:
PROOF OF SERVICE BY FIRST-CLASS MAIL—CIVIL CGC-10-500934
(Do not use this Proof of Service to show service of a Summons and Complaint.)
4. lam over 18 years of age and not a party to this action. | am a resident of or employed in the county where the mailing
took place.
2. My residence or business address is:
1440 Broadway, Suite 1000, Oakland, CA 94612
3. On (date):September 12, 2012 | mailed from (city and state): Oakland, CA
the following documents (specify):
[¥] The documents are listed in the Attachment to Proof of Service by First-Class Mail—Civil (Documents Served)
(form POS-030(D)).
4. | served the documents by enclosing them in an envelope and (check one):
a. [__] depositing the sealed envelope with the United States Postal Service with the postage fully prepaid.
b. [_] placing the envelope for collection and mailing following our ordinary business practices. | am readily familiar with this
business's practice for collecting and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is
placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service in
a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid.
5. The envelope was addressed and mailed as follows:
a. Name of person served: Hanna Raanan
b. Address of person served:
6500 Wilshire Boulevard, Seventeenth Floor
Los Angeles, California 90048
The name and address of each person to whom | mailed the documents is listed in the Attachment to Proof of Service
by First-Class Mail—Civil (Persons Served) (POS-030(P)).
| declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
Date: October 4, 2012
Zoe Genzler
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF PERSON COMPLETING THIS FORM) (SIGNATURE OF PERSON COMPLETING THIS FORM)
Form Approved for Optional Use PROOF OF SERVICE BY FIRST-CLASS MAIL—CIVIL Code of ivi Procedure, §§ 8019, 10138
POS-030 [New January 1, 2005) (Proof of Service)POS-030(D)
SHORT TITLE: Cathay Bank v. R: id Xiang Kai Zhang, et al. CASE NUMBER:
‘athay Bank v. Raymond Xiang Kai Zhang, et al Gc-10-500934
ATTACHMENT TO PROOF OF SERVICE BY FIRST-CLASS MAIL—CIVIL (DOCUMENTS SERVED)
(This Attachment is for use with form POS-030)
The documents that were personally served by first-class mail are as follows (describe each document specifically):
[Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoenas for Consumer
Records of Defendants; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support
Deciration of Maureen McCuaig in Support of Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to
Quash Deposition Subpoenas for Consumer Records of Defendants, and Request for Monteary Sanctions
Fog Approved for Optona Use ATTACHMENT TO PROOF OF SERVICE BY pave 1 or 1
os Sno) few January 1 2005) FIRST-CLASS MAIL—CIVIL (DOCUMENTS SERVED)
(Proof of Service)
Document Filed Date
October 04, 2012
Case Filing Date
June 22, 2010
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.