arrow left
arrow right
  • CHARLES HUSBAND VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS ASBESTOS document preview
  • CHARLES HUSBAND VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS ASBESTOS document preview
  • CHARLES HUSBAND VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS ASBESTOS document preview
  • CHARLES HUSBAND VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS ASBESTOS document preview
  • CHARLES HUSBAND VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS ASBESTOS document preview
  • CHARLES HUSBAND VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

William M. Hake, Esq. (State Bar No. 110956) Melissa E. Macfarlane, Esq. (State Bar No. 239811) COOLEY MANION JONES HAKE KUROWSKI LLP ELECTRONICALLY 201 Spear Street, 18th Floor San Francisco, CA. 94105 FILED. Tel: (415) 512-4381 Superior Court of California, Fax: (415) 512-6791 County of San Francisco SEP 07 2010 Attomeys for Defendant Clerk of the Court TEMPORARY PLANT CLEANERS, INC. BY: EDNALEEN JAVIER lerk eputy Cle IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO CHARLES HUSBAND, Case No.: CGC-09-275098 Plaintiff, DEFENDANT TEMPORARY PLANT CLEANERS, INC.’S CONDITIONAL NON- v. OPPOSITION TO CO-DEFENDANT HAMILTON MATERIALS, INC.’S MOTION ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P), TO SEVER CASE FROM BRAYTON GROUP 535 AND CONTINUE TRIAL DATE Dept: September 8, 2010 Time: 9:30 am. Dept.: 220 Judge: The Hon. Harold E. Kahn Trial Date: October 4, 2010 Action Filed: March 2, 2009 Defendants. TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Co-Defendant HAMILTON MATERIALS, INC. requests that the Court sever this case from Brayton Group 535 with a trial date of October 4, 2010, and further requests that the Court continue the trial date. Defendant Temporary Plant Cleaners, Inc. is not opposed to these requests. Should this case be severed from Brayton Group 535, and the trial continued, Defendant Temporary Plant Cleaners, Inc. requests that discovery remain open as to Defendant Hamilton Materials, Inc., only. Defendant Temporary Plant Cleaners, Inc. objects to discovery remaining open as to all parties. All parties have actively participated in discovery, and Defendant 1 DEFENDANT TEMPORARY PLANT CLEANERS, INC."S CONDITIONAL NON-OPPOSITION TO CO-DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SEVER CASE FROM BRAYTON GROUP 535, AND CONTINUED TRIAL DATETemporary Plant Cleaners, Inc. would be prejudiced by the re-opening of discovery. DATED: September 7, 2010 COOLEY MANION JONES HAKE KUROWSKI LLP lissa E. Macfarlane Attorneys for Defendant TEMPORARY PLANT CLEANERS, INC. 2 DEFENDANT TEMPORARY PLANT CLEANERS, INC,’S CONDITIONAL NON-OPPOSITION TO CO-DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SEVER CASE FROM BRAYTON GROUP 535, AND CONTINUED TRIAL DATEDo em YN DHA WF YW NY & Rw oM NN RN NR NY Ne Be Be Be Be ee ee ee eo 32 AF A 8 BHR SF SF CHA AH RB WKH KEK Ss PROOF OF SERVICE BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMITTAL I, the below undersigned, am a citizen of the United States and employed in San Francisco, California. 1 am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within-entitled action. My business address is 201 Spear Street, Suite 1800, San Francisco, CA 94105. On September 7, 2010, I electronically filed and served via Lexis/Nexis File and Serve the following document on all parties as set forth in the accompanying transaction report: DEFENDANT TEMPORARY PLANT CLEANERS, INC.’S CONDITIONAL NON- OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT HAMILTON MATERIALS, INC.’S MOTION TO SEVER CASE FROM BRAYTON GROUP 535 AND CONTINUE TRIAL DATE I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. Executed on September 7, 2010, at San Francisco California. Za Od LAUREN B. McRAY 3 DEFENDANT TEMPORARY PLANT CLEANERS, INC.’S CONDITIONAL NON-OPPOSITION TO CO-DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SEVER CASE FROM BRAYTON GROUP 535, AND CONTINUED TRIAL DATE.